Literature DB >> 25779227

The use of the needle-free jet injection system with buffered lidocaine device does not change intravenous placement success in children in the emergency department.

Maren M Lunoe1, Amy L Drendel, David C Brousseau.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The needle-free jet injection system with buffered lidocaine (J tip) has been shown to reduce pain for intravenous (IV) line insertion, but its relationship with successful IV placement has not been well studied. This study aimed to determine if J tip use is associated with improved first-attempt IV placement success in children.
METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of children ages 1 to 18 years with need for emergent IV placement. Approximately 300 children were selected from each of three separate age groups: 1 to 2, 3 to 6, and 7 to 18 years. The standard treatment group (no device) included children with IV insertions from January 2009 through January 2010 with no J tip. The J tip treatment group (device) included children with IV insertions from December 2010 through December 2011 who received J tips. Successful IV placement on first attempt was the primary outcome. A chi-square test was used to compare the proportion of first-attempt success and logistic regression was performed to assess the effect of device use and patient age, sex, and race on first-attempt success.
RESULTS: A total of 958 children were identified, 501 in the no-device group and 457 in the device group. The most common diagnoses were vomiting or dehydration (30.3%), trauma or burn (20.0%), and infection (15.5%). Overall, first-attempt success was 69.0% and was similar between the no-device (68.7%) and device (69.4%) groups (p = 0.81). No difference in first-attempt success with the use of the device was found in any of the age groups. Multivariate analysis found that only age of 1 to 2 years was associated with lower odds of first-attempt success when controlling for patient characteristics and device use.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of the J tip did not affect first-attempt success for IV placement in children.
© 2015 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25779227      PMCID: PMC4641518          DOI: 10.1111/acem.12629

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  9 in total

1.  Liposomal lidocaine to improve procedural success rates and reduce procedural pain among children: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Anna Taddio; Herpreet Kaur Soin; Suzanne Schuh; Gideon Koren; Dennis Scolnik
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-06-21       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Derivation of the DIVA score: a clinical prediction rule for the identification of children with difficult intravenous access.

Authors:  Kenneth Yen; Anne Riegert; Marc H Gorelick
Journal:  Pediatr Emerg Care       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.454

3.  A comparison of a needle-free injection system for local anesthesia versus EMLA for intravenous catheter insertion in the pediatric patient.

Authors:  Nathalia Jimenez; Heidi Bradford; Kristy D Seidel; Manuela Sousa; Anne M Lynn
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  Validation and refinement of the difficult intravenous access score: a clinical prediction rule for identifying children with difficult intravenous access.

Authors:  Michael W Riker; Chris Kennedy; Brad S Winfrey; Kenneth Yen; M Denise Dowd
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.451

5.  A randomized, double-blind controlled study of jet lidocaine compared to jet placebo for pain relief in children undergoing needle insertion in the emergency department.

Authors:  Marc Auerbach; Michael Tunik; Michael Mojica
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 3.451

6.  A prospective survey of reactions to blood tests by children and adolescents.

Authors:  C Fradet; P J McGrath; J Kay; S Adams; B Luke
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  Success rates for peripheral i.v. insertion in a children's hospital. Financial implications.

Authors:  A M Frey
Journal:  J Intraven Nurs       Date:  1998 May-Jun

8.  Jet Injection of 1% buffered lidocaine versus topical ELA-Max for anesthesia before peripheral intravenous catheterization in children: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Stephanie Spanos; Rebekah Booth; Heidi Koenig; Kendra Sikes; Edward Gracely; In K Kim
Journal:  Pediatr Emerg Care       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.454

9.  Caregivers' responses to pain in their children in the emergency department.

Authors:  Ryan W Smith; Vibhuti Shah; Ran D Goldman; Anna Taddio
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2007-06
  9 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  Managing pain and distress in children undergoing brief diagnostic and therapeutic procedures.

Authors:  Evelyne D Trottier; Marie-Joëlle Doré-Bergeron; Laurel Chauvin-Kimoff; Krista Baerg; Samina Ali
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 2.253

2.  Pediatric pain treatment and prevention for hospitalized children.

Authors:  Stefan J Friedrichsdorf; Liesbet Goubert
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2019-12-19

Review 3.  Managing Pediatric Pain in the Emergency Department.

Authors:  Benoit Bailey; Evelyne D Trottier
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 4.  [Pediatric pain treatment and prevention for hospitalized children].

Authors:  Stefan J Friedrichsdorf; Liesbet Goubert
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 1.107

5.  A hospital-wide initiative to eliminate or reduce needle pain in children using lean methodology.

Authors:  Stefan J Friedrichsdorf; Donna Eull; Christian Weidner; Andrea Postier
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2018-09-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.