Literature DB >> 25779110

Impact of common cytostatic drugs on pollen fertility in higher plants.

Miroslav Mišík1, Michael Kundi2, Clemens Pichler1, Metka Filipic3, Bernhard Rainer1, Katarina Mišíková4, Armen Nersesyan1, Siegfried Knasmueller5.   

Abstract

Cytostatic drugs are among the most toxic chemicals which are produced. Many of them cause damage of the genetic material which may affect the fertility of higher organisms. To study the impact of the widely used anticancer drugs [cisplatin (CisPt), etoposide (Et), and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)] on the reproduction of higher plants, pollen abortion experiments were conducted with species which belong to major plant families, namely with Tradescantia paludosa (Commelinaceae), Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae), Chelidonium majus (Papaveraceae), and Alisma plantago-aquatica (Alismataceae). All compounds increased the frequencies of abortive grains. The lowest effective doses were in general in a narrow range (i.e., 1 and 10 mg/kg of dry soil). The effects of the individual drugs were similar in T. paludosa, A. plantago-aquatica, and Ch. majus, while A. thaliana was consistently less sensitive. The highest abortion rate was obtained in most experiments with CisPt, followed by 5-FU and Et. Comparisons of the doses which caused effects in the present experiments in the different species with the predicted environment concentrations and with the levels of the cytostatics which were detected in hospital wastewaters show that the realistic environmental concentrations of the drugs are 4-6 orders of magnitude lower. Therefore, it is unlikely that these drugs affect the fertility of higher plants in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alisma; Arabidopsis; Chelidonium; Cytostatics; Pollen abortion; Tradescantia; Wild plants

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25779110     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-015-4301-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  30 in total

Review 1.  Micro-evolution due to pollution: possible consequences for ecosystem responses to toxic stress.

Authors:  Matías H Medina; Juan A Correa; Carlos Barata
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2007-01-30       Impact factor: 7.086

Review 2.  Endocrine-disrupting chemicals: associated disorders and mechanisms of action.

Authors:  Sam De Coster; Nicolas van Larebeke
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2012-09-06

Review 3.  Removal of cytostatic drugs from aquatic environment: a review.

Authors:  Jiefeng Zhang; Victor W C Chang; Apostolos Giannis; Jing-Yuan Wang
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2013-01-19       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Genetic activity profiles of anticancer drugs.

Authors:  M A Jackson; H F Stack; M D Waters
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1996-08-17       Impact factor: 2.433

5.  Active biomonitoring of heavy metal pollution using Rosa rugosa plants.

Authors:  Gian Lorenzo Calzoni; Fabiana Antognoni; Elena Pari; Paolo Fonti; Antonio Gnes; Anna Speranza
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 8.071

6.  Combined environmental risk assessment for 5-fluorouracil and capecitabine in Europe.

Authors:  Jürg Oliver Straub
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.992

7.  Development of a UPLC-MS/MS method for the determination of ten anticancer drugs in hospital and urban wastewaters, and its application for the screening of human metabolites assisted by information-dependent acquisition tool (IDA) in sewage samples.

Authors:  L Ferrando-Climent; S Rodriguez-Mozaz; D Barceló
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 4.142

8.  Fluorouracil in the environment: analysis, occurrence, degradation and transformation.

Authors:  Tina Kosjek; Silva Perko; Dušan Žigon; Ester Heath
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 4.759

9.  Pollen tetrads in the detection of environmental mutagenesis.

Authors:  D L Mulcahy
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 10.  Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors as marketed anticancer drugs: where are we now? A short survey.

Authors:  Gaëlle Mariaule; Philippe Belmont
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 4.411

View more
  1 in total

1.  Fate and effects of the residues of anticancer drugs in the environment.

Authors:  Ester Heath; Metka Filipič; Tina Kosjek; Marina Isidori
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 4.223

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.