Literature DB >> 25779109

Comprehensive studies of hydrogeochemical processes and quality status of groundwater with tools of cluster, grouping analysis, and fuzzy set method using GIS platform: a case study of Dalcheon in Ulsan City, Korea.

S Venkatramanan1, S Y Chung, R Rajesh, S Y Lee, T Ramkumar, M V Prasanna.   

Abstract

This research aimed at developing comprehensive assessments of physicochemical quality of groundwater for drinking and irrigation purposes at Dalcheon in Ulsan City, Korea. The mean concentration of major ions represented as follows: Ca (94.3 mg/L) > Mg (41.7 mg/L) > Na (19.2 mg/L) > K (3.2 mg/L) for cations and SO4 (351 mg/L) > HCO3 (169 mg/L) > Cl (19 mg/L) for anions. Thematic maps for physicochemical parameters of groundwater were prepared, classified, weighted, and integrated in GIS method with fuzzy logic. The maps exhibited that suitable zone of drinking and irrigation purpose occupied in SE, NE, and NW sectors. The undesirable zone of drinking purpose was observed in SW and central parts and that of irrigation was in the western part of the study area. This was influenced by improperly treated effluents from an abandoned iron ore mine, irrigation, and domestic fields. By grouping analysis, groundwater types were classified into Ca(HCO3)2, (Ca,Mg)Cl2, and CaCl2, and CaHCO3 was the most predominant type. Grouping analysis also showed three types of irrigation water such as C1S1, C1S2, and C1S3. C1S3 type of high salinity to low sodium hazard was the most dominant in the study area. Equilibrium processes elucidated the groundwater samples were in the saturated to undersaturated condition with respect to aragonite, calcite, dolomite, and gypsum due to precipitation and deposition processes. Cluster analysis suggested that high contents of SO4 and HCO3 with low Cl was related with water-rock interactions and along with mining impact. This study showed that the effluents discharged from mining waste was the main sources of groundwater quality deterioration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25779109     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-015-4290-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  9 in total

1.  Identification of river water quality using the fuzzy synthetic evaluation approach.

Authors:  N B Chang; H W Chen; S K Ning
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.789

2.  A generalized water quality index for Taiwan.

Authors:  Shiow-Mey Liou; Shang-Lien Lo; Shan-Hsien Wang
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2004 Aug-Sep       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Can fuzzy logic bring complex environmental problems into focus?

Authors:  Thomas E McKone; Ashok W Deshpande
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  A fuzzy index model for trophic status evaluation of reservoir waters.

Authors:  Yi-Ting Liou; Shang-Lien Lo
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2005-03-23       Impact factor: 11.236

5.  Assessing water quality in rivers with fuzzy inference systems: a case study.

Authors:  William Ocampo-Duque; Núria Ferré-Huguet; José L Domingo; Marta Schuhmacher
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2006-05-06       Impact factor: 9.621

6.  Analysis of groundwater quality using fuzzy synthetic evaluation.

Authors:  Sudhir Dahiya; Bupinder Singh; Shalini Gaur; V K Garg; H S Kushwaha
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2007-02-02       Impact factor: 10.588

7.  A novel approach in water quality assessment based on fuzzy logic.

Authors:  Hamed Gharibi; Amir Hossein Mahvi; Ramin Nabizadeh; Hossein Arabalibeik; Masud Yunesian; Mohammad Hossein Sowlat
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 6.789

8.  Different methodologies to quantify uncertainties of air emissions.

Authors:  Daniela Romano; Antonella Bernetti; Riccardo De Lauretis
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 9.621

9.  Fuzzy synthetic evaluation of disinfection by-products--a risk-based indexing system.

Authors:  Rehan Sadiq; Manuel J Rodriguez
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.789

  9 in total
  7 in total

1.  Application of Dempster-Shafer theory and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process for evaluating the effects of geological formation units on groundwater quality.

Authors:  Marzieh Mokarram; Majid Hojati; Ali Saber
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Spatial interpolation methods and geostatistics for mapping groundwater contamination in a coastal area.

Authors:  Vetrimurugan Elumalai; K Brindha; Bongani Sithole; Elango Lakshmanan
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Modeling urban air pollution with optimized hierarchical fuzzy inference system.

Authors:  Behnam Tashayo; Abbas Alimohammadi
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Discontinuous permeable adsorptive barrier design and cost analysis: a methodological approach to optimisation.

Authors:  Giovanni Francesco Santonastaso; Immacolata Bortone; Simeone Chianese; Armando Di Nardo; Michele Di Natale; Alessandro Erto; Despina Karatza; Dino Musmarra
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Factors controlling groundwater quality in the Yeonjegu District of Busan City, Korea, using the hydrogeochemical processes and fuzzy GIS.

Authors:  Senapathi Venkatramanan; Sang Yong Chung; Sekar Selvam; Seung Yeop Lee; Hussam Eldin Elzain
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Geochemical Modeling Source Provenance, Public Health Exposure, and Evaluating Potentially Harmful Elements in Groundwater: Statistical and Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA).

Authors:  Abdur Rashid; Muhammad Ayub; Zahid Ullah; Asmat Ali; Seema Anjum Khattak; Liaqat Ali; Xubo Gao; Chengcheng Li; Sardar Khan; Hamed A El-Serehy; Prashant Kaushik
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 4.614

7.  Quantifying the impact of scholarly papers based on higher-order weighted citations.

Authors:  Xiaomei Bai; Fuli Zhang; Jie Hou; Ivan Lee; Xiangjie Kong; Amr Tolba; Feng Xia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.