Literature DB >> 25778447

Should HLA mismatch acceptability for sensitized transplant candidates be determined at the high-resolution rather than the antigen level?

R J Duquesnoy1, M Kamoun, L A Baxter-Lowe, E S Woodle, R A Bray, F H J Claas, D D Eckels, J J Friedewald, S V Fuggle, H M Gebel, J A Gerlach, J J Fung, D Middleton, P Nickerson, R Shapiro, A R Tambur, C J Taylor, K Tinckam, A Zeevi.   

Abstract

Defining HLA mismatch acceptability of organ transplant donors for sensitized recipients has traditionally been based on serologically defined HLA antigens. Now, however, it is well accepted that HLA antibodies specifically recognize a wide range of epitopes present on HLA antigens and that molecularly defined high resolution alleles corresponding to the same low resolution antigen can possess different epitope repertoires. Hence, determination of HLA compatibility at the allele level represents a more accurate approach to identify suitable donors for sensitized patients. This approach would offer opportunities for increased transplant rates and improved long term graft survivals. © Copyright 2015 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alloantibody; immunogenetics; major histocompatibility complex (MHC); panel reactive antibody (PRA); sensitization

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25778447     DOI: 10.1111/ajt.13167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  23 in total

1.  Accurate Typing of Human Leukocyte Antigen Class I Genes by Oxford Nanopore Sequencing.

Authors:  Chang Liu; Fangzhou Xiao; Jessica Hoisington-Lopez; Kathrin Lang; Philipp Quenzel; Brian Duffy; Robi D Mitra
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 5.568

2.  Desensitization Strategies Pre- and Post-Cardiac Transplantation.

Authors:  Robert M Cole; Jon A Kobashigawa
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2016-02

Review 3.  Genotyping Applications for Transplantation and Transfusion Management: The Emory Experience.

Authors:  Ross M Fasano; Harold Cliff Sullivan; Robert A Bray; Howard M Gebel; Erin K Meyer; Annie M Winkler; Cassandra D Josephson; Sean R Stowell; Alexander Sandy Duncan; John D Roback
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 5.534

4.  Virtual HLA Crossmatching as a Means to Safely Expedite Transplantation of Imported Pancreata.

Authors:  Brian C Eby; Robert R Redfield; Thomas M Ellis; Glen E Leverson; Abby R Schenian; Jon S Odorico
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  cPRA Increases With DQA, DPA, and DPB Unacceptable Antigens in the Canadian cPRA Calculator.

Authors:  K J Tinckam; R Liwski; D Pochinco; M Mousseau; A Grattan; P Nickerson; P Campbell
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 6.  The Humoral Theory of Transplantation: Epitope Analysis and the Pathogenicity of HLA Antibodies.

Authors:  Edward J Filippone; John L Farber
Journal:  J Immunol Res       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 4.818

7.  The value of high-resolution HLA in the perioperative period of non-sensitized lung transplant recipients.

Authors:  Ji Zhang; Dong Liu; Caixin Zhang; Min Zhou; Jian Lv; Hongmei Wang; Hang Yang; Li Fan; Bo Wu; Jingyu Chen
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-02

Review 8.  Clinically relevant interpretation of solid phase assays for HLA antibody.

Authors:  Maria P Bettinotti; Andrea A Zachary; Mary S Leffell
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.640

9.  Some considerations on the current debate about typing resolution in solid organ transplantation.

Authors:  Paraskevi Vogiatzi
Journal:  Transplant Res       Date:  2016-03-08

Review 10.  Reflections on HLA Epitope-Based Matching for Transplantation.

Authors:  Rene J Duquesnoy
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 7.561

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.