Literature DB >> 25778345

Region-Specific Summation Patterns Inform the Role of Cortical Areas in Selecting Motor Plans.

Steve W C Chang1, Jeffrey L Calton2, Bonnie M Lawrence3, Anthony R Dickinson4, Lawrence H Snyder4.   

Abstract

Given an instruction regarding which effector to move and what location to move to, simply adding the effector and spatial signals together will not lead to movement selection. For this, a nonlinearity is required. Thresholds, for example, can be used to select a particular response and reject others. Here we consider another useful nonlinearity, a supralinear multiplicative interaction. To help select a motor plan, spatial and effector signals could multiply and thereby amplify each other. Such an amplification could constitute one step within a distributed network involved in response selection, effectively boosting one response while suppressing others. We therefore asked whether effector and spatial signals sum supralinearly for planning eye versus arm movements from the parietal reach region (PRR), the lateral intraparietal area (LIP), the frontal eye field (FEF), and a portion of area 5 (A5) lying just anterior to PRR. Unlike LIP neurons, PRR, FEF, and, to a lesser extent, A5 neurons show a supralinear interaction. Our results suggest that selecting visually guided eye versus arm movements is likely to be mediated by PRR and FEF but not LIP.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  frontal eye field; lateral intraparietal area; motor decision; motor planning; parietal reach region

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25778345      PMCID: PMC4830291          DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhv047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  61 in total

1.  Non-spatial, motor-specific activation in posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Calton; Anthony R Dickinson; Lawrence H Snyder
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Neural activity in primary motor and dorsal premotor cortex in reaching tasks with the contralateral versus ipsilateral arm.

Authors:  Paul Cisek; Donald J Crammond; John F Kalaska
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Functional organization of human intraparietal and frontal cortex for attending, looking, and pointing.

Authors:  Serguei V Astafiev; Gordon L Shulman; Christine M Stanley; Abraham Z Snyder; David C Van Essen; Maurizio Corbetta
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Nonspatial saccade-specific activation in area LIP of monkey parietal cortex.

Authors:  A R Dickinson; J L Calton; L H Snyder
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-06-11       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Microstimulation of the frontal eye field and its effects on covert spatial attention.

Authors:  Tirin Moore; Mazyar Fallah
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-09-17       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Spatial tuning of reaching activity in the medial parieto-occipital cortex (area V6A) of macaque monkey.

Authors:  Patrizia Fattori; Dieter F Kutz; Rossella Breveglieri; Nicoletta Marzocchi; Claudio Galletti
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.386

7.  Contribution of the monkey frontal eye field to covert visual attention.

Authors:  Claire Wardak; Guilhem Ibos; Jean-René Duhamel; Etienne Olivier
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Primate frontal eye fields. I. Single neurons discharging before saccades.

Authors:  C J Bruce; M E Goldberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  FMRI evidence for a 'parietal reach region' in the human brain.

Authors:  Jason D Connolly; Richard A Andersen; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-04       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Neural activity in macaque parietal cortex reflects temporal integration of visual motion signals during perceptual decision making.

Authors:  Alexander C Huk; Michael N Shadlen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-11-09       Impact factor: 6.709

View more
  1 in total

1.  Lateral intraparietal area (LIP) is largely effector-specific in free-choice decisions.

Authors:  Vassilios N Christopoulos; Igor Kagan; Richard A Andersen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 4.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.