Literature DB >> 25777355

Consciousness wanted, attention found: Reasons for the advantage of the left visual field in identifying T2 among rapidly presented series.

Rolf Verleger1, Kamila Śmigasiewicz2.   

Abstract

Everyday experience suggests that people are equally aware of events in both hemi-fields. However, when two streams of stimuli are rapidly presented left and right containing two targets, the second target is better identified in the left than in the right visual field. This might be considered evidence for a right-hemisphere advantage in generating conscious percepts. However, this putative asymmetry of conscious perception cannot be measured independently of participants' access to their conscious percepts, and there is actually evidence from split-brain patients for the reverse, left-hemisphere advantage in having access to conscious percepts. Several other topics were studied in search of the responsible mechanism, among others: Mutual inhibition of hemispheres, cooperation of hemispheres in perceiving midline stimuli, and asymmetries in processing various perceptual inputs. Directing attention by salient cues turned out to be one of the few mechanisms capable of modifying the left visual-field advantage in this paradigm. Thus, this left visual-field advantage is best explained by the notion of a right-hemisphere advantage in directing attention to salient events. Dovetailing with the pathological asymmetries of attention after right-hemisphere lesions and with asymmetries of brain activation when healthy participants shift their attention, the present results extend that body of evidence by demonstrating unusually large and reliable behavioral asymmetries for attention-directing processes in healthy participants.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Cerebral asymmetry; Left hemifield; Rapid serial visual presentation; Right hemisphere

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25777355     DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.02.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conscious Cogn        ISSN: 1053-8100


  3 in total

1.  Magnitude of sex differences in visual search varies with target eccentricity.

Authors:  Michael C W English; Murray T Maybery; Troy A W Visser
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-02

2.  Age-Related Inter-Region EEG Coupling Changes During the Control of Bottom-Up and Top-Down Attention.

Authors:  Ling Li; Dandan Zhao
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 5.750

3.  Get Set or Get Distracted? Disentangling Content-Priming and Attention-Catching Effects of Background Lure Stimuli on Identifying Targets in Two Simultaneously Presented Series.

Authors:  Rolf Verleger; Kamila Śmigasiewicz; Lars Michael; Laura Heikaus; Michael Niedeggen
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2019-12-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.