BACKGROUND: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients show evidence of altered central processing of visceral signals. One of the proposed alterations in sensory processing is an altered engagement of endogenous pain modulation mechanisms. The aim was to test the hypothesis that IBS patients with (IBS-S) and without visceral hypersensitivity (IBS-N) differ in their ability to engage endogenous pain modulation mechanism during habituation to repeated visceral stimuli. METHODS: Brain blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) response was measured during repeated rectal distension and its anticipation in 33 IBS patients with and without visceral hypersensitivity and 18 healthy controls (HCs). BOLD response to early and late phase of the distension series was compared within and between groups. KEY RESULTS: While BOLD response was similar during the early phase of the experiment, IBS-S showed greater BOLD response than IBS-N and HCs during the late phase of the distension series. IBS-S showed increasing BOLD response both to the anticipation and delivery of low intensity rectal distensions in brain regions including insula, anterior and mid cingulate cortex. IBS-N showed decreasing BOLD response to repeated rectal distensions in brain regions including insula, prefrontal cortex and amygdala. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: These findings are consistent with compromised ability of IBS-S to respond to repeated delivery of rectal stimuli, both in terms of sensitization of sensory pathways and habituation of emotional arousal. The fact that both IBS subgroups met Rome criteria, and did not differ in terms of reported symptom severity demonstrates that similar symptom patterns can result from different underlying neurobiological mechanisms.
BACKGROUND:Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients show evidence of altered central processing of visceral signals. One of the proposed alterations in sensory processing is an altered engagement of endogenous pain modulation mechanisms. The aim was to test the hypothesis that IBSpatients with (IBS-S) and without visceral hypersensitivity (IBS-N) differ in their ability to engage endogenous pain modulation mechanism during habituation to repeated visceral stimuli. METHODS: Brain blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) response was measured during repeated rectal distension and its anticipation in 33 IBSpatients with and without visceral hypersensitivity and 18 healthy controls (HCs). BOLD response to early and late phase of the distension series was compared within and between groups. KEY RESULTS: While BOLD response was similar during the early phase of the experiment, IBS-S showed greater BOLD response than IBS-N and HCs during the late phase of the distension series. IBS-S showed increasing BOLD response both to the anticipation and delivery of low intensity rectal distensions in brain regions including insula, anterior and mid cingulate cortex. IBS-N showed decreasing BOLD response to repeated rectal distensions in brain regions including insula, prefrontal cortex and amygdala. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: These findings are consistent with compromised ability of IBS-S to respond to repeated delivery of rectal stimuli, both in terms of sensitization of sensory pathways and habituation of emotional arousal. The fact that both IBS subgroups met Rome criteria, and did not differ in terms of reported symptom severity demonstrates that similar symptom patterns can result from different underlying neurobiological mechanisms.
Authors: Arpana Gupta; Emeran A Mayer; Connor Fling; Jennifer S Labus; Bruce D Naliboff; Jui-Yang Hong; Lisa A Kilpatrick Journal: J Neurosci Res Date: 2017-01-02 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Rachel D Moloney; Anthony C Johnson; Siobhain M O'Mahony; Timothy G Dinan; Beverley Greenwood-Van Meerveld; John F Cryan Journal: CNS Neurosci Ther Date: 2015-12-10 Impact factor: 5.243
Authors: Els Pazmany; Huynh Giao Ly; Leen Aerts; Michiko Kano; Sophie Bergeron; Johan Verhaeghe; Ronald Peeters; Jan Tack; Patrick Dupont; Paul Enzlin; Lukas Van Oudenhove Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2017-07-25 Impact factor: 4.881
Authors: Elena Lucarini; Elisabetta Coppi; Laura Micheli; Carmen Parisio; Alessia Vona; Federica Cherchi; Anna M Pugliese; Felicita Pedata; Paola Failli; Seph Palomino; Jared Wahl; Tally M Largent-Milnes; Todd W Vanderah; Dilip K Tosh; Kenneth A Jacobson; Daniela Salvemini; Carla Ghelardini; Lorenzo Di Cesare Mannelli Journal: Pain Date: 2020-09-01 Impact factor: 7.926