Literature DB >> 25777086

Factors Implicated for Delay of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Observational Studies.

George Malietzis1,2, Aamer Mughal2, Andrew C Currie1,2, Nicola Anyamene3, Robin H Kennedy1,2, Thanos Athanasiou2, John T Jenkins4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The survival benefit of administering adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in colorectal cancer is well established, as is the impact of its timing. Although various factors have been associated with treatment delay, their implications remain controversial. We determined clinicopathological factors associated with delay in transition to AC via systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHODS: Studies assessing factors for delay in initiating AC were identified from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Databases. Studies were included only if relevant clinicopathological factors were adequately described and appropriate comparative groups were balanced. For each study, the odds ratio (OR) and 95 % confidence interval (CI) were estimated, regarding response to early versus delayed AC initiation.
RESULTS: We identified 15 eligible studies involving 67,537 patients. Twelve studies were multicentre studies and three were single-center cohort studies. Meta-analysis demonstrated age >75 years [4 studies, OR = 1.44 (95 % CI 1.32-1.58)], marital status-single [3 studies, OR = 1.32 (95 % CI 1.20-1.44)], low socioeconomic status (SES) [7 studies, OR = 1.67 (95 % CI 1.32-2.12)], worse comorbidity status [5 studies, OR = 1.47 (95 % CI 1.14-1.90)], low tumour grade [7 studies, OR = 1.06 (95 % CI 1.02-1.11)], prolonged length of stay [3 studies, OR 2.37 (95 % CI 2.10-2.68)], and readmission [3 studies, OR = 3.23 (95 % CI 1.66-6.26)] were significant predictors of delayed initiation of AC. Laparoscopy compared to an open surgical approach was a significant predictor of earlier AC initiation [5 studies, OR = 0.70 (95 % CI 0.51-0.97)].
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy is associated with earlier initiation of AC, encouraging its increased adoption. Social isolation and low SES merit consideration of approaches that counter the lack of social support and deprivation to improve cancer outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25777086     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-4479-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  16 in total

Review 1.  Caregiver Well-being and the Quality of Cancer Care.

Authors:  Kristin Litzelman
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 2.315

2.  Laparoscopic versus open parenchymal preserving liver resections in the posterosuperior segments: a case-matched study.

Authors:  Mathieu D'Hondt; Esther Tamby; Isabelle Boscart; Simon Turcotte; Isabelle Parmentier; Hans Pottel; Réal Lapointe; Sander Ovaere; Franky Vansteenkiste; Franck Vandenbroucke-Menu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Racial/Ethnic and Socioeconomic Differences in Colorectal and Breast Cancer Treatment Quality: The Role of Physician-level Variations in Care.

Authors:  Ioana Popescu; Deborah Schrag; Alfonso Ang; Mitchell Wong
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Compliance with the ERAS Protocol and 3-Year Survival After Laparoscopic Surgery for Non-metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Magdalena Pisarska; Grzegorz Torbicz; Natalia Gajewska; Mateusz Rubinkiewicz; Mateusz Wierdak; Piotr Major; Andrzej Budzyński; Olle Ljungqvist; Michał Pędziwiatr
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Risk factors for anastomotic dehiscence in colon cancer surgery--a population-based registry study.

Authors:  Bodil Gessler; David Bock; Hans-Christian Pommergaard; Jakob Burcharth; Jacob Rosenberg; Eva Angenete
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Effect of Comorbidity on Postoperative Survival Outcomes in Patients with Solid Cancers: A 6-Year Multicenter Study in Taiwan.

Authors:  Wen-Chi Chou; Pei-Hung Chang; Chang-Hsien Lu; Keng-Hao Liu; Yu-Shin Hung; Chia-Yen Hung; Chien-Ting Liu; Kun-Yun Yeh; Yung-Chang Lin; Ta-Sen Yeh
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 4.207

7.  Effect of Early Adjuvant Chemotherapy on Survival of Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients: a Propensity Score-matched Analysis.

Authors:  Yoontaek Lee; Sa-Hong Min; Ki Bum Park; Young Suk Park; Ji-Won Kim; Sang-Hoon Ahn; Jin Won Kim; Do Joong Park; Keun-Wook Lee; Hyung-Ho Kim
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 3.720

8.  Comparison of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Authors:  Jaewoo Kwon; Ki Byung Song; Seo Young Park; Dakyum Shin; Sarang Hong; Yejong Park; Woohyung Lee; Jae Hoon Lee; Dae Wook Hwang; Song Cheol Kim
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  Preoperative Nutritional Status Contributes to the Development of Neutropenia Event in Patients With Gastric Cancer Receiving CAPEOX Adjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Ai Tang Xiao; Yi Xin Tong; Xiang Shang Xu; Yi Zhou; Sheng Zhang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Association of Cumulative Social Risk and Social Support With Receipt of Chemotherapy Among Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Rachel E Davis; Amber W Trickey; Paul Abrahamse; Ikuko Kato; Kevin Ward; Arden M Morris
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-06-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.