Shigella spp. are among the enteric pathogens with the highest attributable incidence of moderate-to-severe diarrhea in children under 5 years of age living in endemic areas. There are no vaccines available to prevent this disease. In this work, we investigated a new Shigella vaccine concept consisting of nonliving, self-adjuvanted, Lactococcus lactis bacterium-like particles (BLP) displaying Shigella invasion plasmid antigen (Ipa) B and IpaD and examined its immunogenicity and protective efficacy in adult and newborn/infant mice immunized via the nasal route. Unique advantages of this approach include the potential for broad protection due to the highly conserved structure of the Ipas and the safety and practicality of a probiotic-based mucosal/adjuvant delivery platform. Immunization of adult mice with BLP-IpaB and BLP-IpaD (BLP-IpaB/D) induced high levels of Ipa-specific serum IgG and stool IgA in a dose-dependent manner. Immune responses and protection were enhanced by BLP delivery. Vaccine-induced serum antibodies exhibited opsonophagocytic and cytotoxic neutralizing activity, and IpaB/D IgG titers correlated with increased survival post-challenge. Ipa-specific antibody secreting cells were detected in nasal tissue and lungs, as well as IgG in bronchoalveolar lavage. Bone marrow cells produced IpaB/D-specific antibodies and contributed to protection after adoptive transfer. The BLP-IpaB/D vaccine conferred 90% and 80% protection against S. flexneri and S. sonnei, respectively. Mice immunized with BLP-IpaB/D as newborns also developed IpaB and IpaD serum antibodies; 90% were protected against S. flexneri and 44% against S. sonnei. The BLP-IpaB/D vaccine is a promising candidate for safe, practical and potentially effective immunization of children against shigellosis.
Shigella spp. are among the enteric pathogens with the highest attributable incidence of moderate-to-severe diarrhea in children under 5 years of age living in endemic areas. There are no vaccines available to prevent this disease. In this work, we investigated a new Shigella vaccine concept consisting of nonliving, self-adjuvanted, Lactococcus lactis bacterium-like particles (BLP) displaying Shigella invasion plasmid antigen (Ipa) B and IpaD and examined its immunogenicity and protective efficacy in adult and newborn/infantmice immunized via the nasal route. Unique advantages of this approach include the potential for broad protection due to the highly conserved structure of the Ipas and the safety and practicality of a probiotic-based mucosal/adjuvant delivery platform. Immunization of adult mice with BLP-IpaB and BLP-IpaD (BLP-IpaB/D) induced high levels of Ipa-specific serum IgG and stool IgA in a dose-dependent manner. Immune responses and protection were enhanced by BLP delivery. Vaccine-induced serum antibodies exhibited opsonophagocytic and cytotoxic neutralizing activity, and IpaB/DIgG titers correlated with increased survival post-challenge. Ipa-specific antibody secreting cells were detected in nasal tissue and lungs, as well as IgG in bronchoalveolar lavage. Bone marrow cells produced IpaB/D-specific antibodies and contributed to protection after adoptive transfer. The BLP-IpaB/D vaccine conferred 90% and 80% protection against S. flexneri and S. sonnei, respectively. Mice immunized with BLP-IpaB/D as newborns also developed IpaB and IpaD serum antibodies; 90% were protected against S. flexneri and 44% against S. sonnei. The BLP-IpaB/D vaccine is a promising candidate for safe, practical and potentially effective immunization of children against shigellosis.
A variety of new vaccine approaches are being explored to improve the safety
and effectiveness of pediatric immunization. Methods that allow administration of
vaccines through mucosal routes are highly desirable, as they are more practical,
less invasive and easier to implement than parenteral injection, the route typically
used for routine immunization. Effective mucosal vaccines that can prevent the
devastating burden of childhood diarrhea in less developed areas of the world would
make a substantial contribution to public health. The recent Global Enteric
Multicenter Study (GEMS), led by the Center for Vaccine Development at the
University of Maryland, identified Shigella as one of the organisms
associated with the largest incidence of diarrheal disease in children under 5 years
of age.[1] When incidence of disease
was stratified by age, toddlers 11–23 months of age were found to be the
most affected group.[1] In addition
to unacceptably high mortality rates, repeated bouts of diarrheal disease throughout
childhood can result in impaired development and long-term disability.[2,3] Aiming to identify an effective pediatric prophylactic tool to
substantially reduce this burden, we focused on Shigella invasion
plasmid antigens (Ipas), which are components of the Type III secretion system, as
potential candidates for the development of a broadly protective subunit-based
Shigella vaccine. We have recently shown that adjuvanted
ShigellaIpaB and IpaD were able to induce robust
cross-protective immunity in mice immunized via mucosal[4,5] or
parenteral[6,7] routes. The purpose of this study was to
investigate the use of non-living Lactococcus lactis bacterium-like
particles (BLP) as an adjuvant and vaccine display system for mucosal delivery of
ShigellaIpaB and IpaD that could potentially be used to
immunize susceptible children. The L. lactisBLP consist of
peptidoglycan (PGN) shell particles devoid of intracellular content that are
produced by heat-acid treatment of L. lactis. They have the same
shape and size as the living L. lactis.[8] Antigens are displayed on the particle
surface as a fusion protein containing a PGN binding domain that attaches
non-covalently and with high avidity to the PGN wall.[8,9]
Because L. lactis is a generally regarded as a safe (GRAS) food
additive, the BLP are likely to be safe for immunization of children through a
mucosal route. The BLP PGN is a Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR-2) agonist[10] and serves as a mucosal
adjuvant.[11] Because of
their larger size (+/− 1–2 μm), the particles
interact more efficiently with mucosal antigen-presenting cells (APC) and facilitate
vaccine uptake. Conceptually, this approach would be highly advantageous because it
combines safety, strong immunogenic capacity and ease of delivery for effective and
practical immunization early in life. A precedent exists for efficient mucosal
immunization of newborn mice with Yersinia pestis LcrV displayed on
L. lactisBLP, which induced mucosal and systemic immunity and
afforded complete protection against systemic plague infection.[10] Likewise, the BLP technology has been
successfully tested in adult mice as a vaccine delivery system for protection
against respiratory syncytial virus[12], malaria[13]
and Streptococcus pneumoniae.[14] Serving as adjuvants, the BLP have been shown to enhance
the immunogenicity[15] and
protective efficacy[16,17] of intranasally (i.n.) delivered influenza
virus vaccines.Herein, we examined the in vivo distribution of i.n. delivered L.
lactis BLP and the immunogenicity and protective capacity of combined
BLP displaying IpaB or IpaD (BLP-IpaB/D). Increasing doses of BLP-IpaB/D and IpaB/D
alone were tested in adult and newborn mice, and a thorough characterization of the
mucosal and systemic immune responses was performed, including a detailed analysis
of serum antibodies along with their functional capacity and association with
protection.
RESULTS
Shigella IpaB and IpaD displayed on L.
lactis BLP
IpaB and IpaD PGN anchor fusion proteins (PA) were successfully produced
and attached to the L. lactisBLP. The SDS-PAGE analysis of the
vaccine preparations revealed bands near the 87 KDa and 64 KDa expected for the
IpaB-PA fusion protein loaded onto the BLP and IpaB alone, respectively (Figure 1a). Bands in the proximity of the
theoretical sizes of 61 KDa and 38 KDa were seen for IpaD-PA loaded on the BLP
and IpaD alone, respectively (Figure 1b).
The IpaB and IpaD displayed on the BLP were recognized by specific monoclonal
antibodies as shown by immunofluorescence images (Figure 1c); no signal was detected for the BLP alone.
Figure 1
Analysis of BLP-IpaB/D by SDS-PAGE and fluorescence microscopy
(a) SDS PAGE analysis of BLP displaying IpaB (BLP-IpaB) or
(b) IpaD (BLP-IpaD). The size of molecular weight markers (in
kDa) is shown on the left (MWM). Proteins were stained with Coomassie blue.
(c) Immunofluorescence (top) and bright field microscopy images
(bottom) of BLP-IpaB, BLP-IpaD and BLP alone. BLP display of IpaB and IpaD was
revealed by incubation with specific monoclonal antibodies: biotin labeled
anti-IpaB followed by Streptavidin-Alexa Fluor® 594 (red) and unlabeled
anti-IpaD followed by anti-mouse Alexa Fluor® 488 (green).
In vivo distribution of L. lactis BLP
To assess the in vivo distribution of i.n. delivered BLP and identify
mucosal tissues potentially involved in immunologic priming, fluorescently
labeled BLP (fBLP) were administered to adult mice at a concentration equivalent
to the highest dose used in the vaccine studies and following the same
immunization procedures (described below). Mice that received unlabeled BLP
served as negative controls. Whole body images were obtained every 2–4 h
for 2 days. The fBLP were seen in the nasal cavity immediately after vaccination
and most of the inoculum remained there for the next 2 h (Figure 2a and b); a small fraction (10%) was
still detected in this compartment 4 h after inoculation but had completely
disappeared at the 12 h time point. The majority of the particles reached the
gastrointestinal tract (most likely due to swallowing reflex) 4 h after
inoculation, with a fraction remaining for up to 24 h (Figure 2a and b). Although not evident from the whole
body images, the fBLP also localized in the lung, as demonstrated by images of
dissected tissue 24 h after inoculation (Figure
2a). Almost all of the fBLP had been cleared from the body 2 days
after vaccination (Figure 2a and b).
Figure 2
In vivo imaging of L. lactis BLP distribution
(a) Unlabeled and fluorescent BLP (fBLP) were administered i.n. to
adult mice in a 30 μl volume, under anesthesia, and whole body images
were obtained at the indicated time points using a Xenogen IVIS-200 imagining
system. (b) Fluorescence distribution among different organs. Each
bar represents mean % of total fluorescence+ SEM from 3 mice per
time point; total fluorescence was the radiant efficiency of fBLP in the
30-μl inoculum. Significant overall differences were determined by
multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), with % fluorescence at each
time point as the variable. Comparisons between fBLP and BLP were then made at
each individual time point using one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s comparison
to a common control (BLP alone); * denotes statistical significance
P<0.05 compared to unlabeled BLP.
Protective immunity induced by intranasal immunization with BLP-IpaB/D in
adult mice
The immunogenicity and protective efficacy of the BLP-IpaB/D in
comparison with IpaB/D (the proteins alone) was first examined in a
dose-escalation experiment. Adult mice were immunized i.n. with increasing
dosage levels of each of the vaccines on days 0, 14 and 28, as described in
Materials and Methods and in the legend to Figure
3. Immunization with BLP-IpaB/D resulted in robust serum IgG
responses to both IpaB and IpaD, which increased in a dose-dependent manner
(Figure 3a). Mice that received the
maximum (Max) dose of BLP-IpaB/D (the largest amount that could be given in the
30-μl inoculum) were the first to respond; this group exhibited
significant levels of IpaB and IpaD-specific IgG, above all other groups, after
the first immunization. Mice that received the high, medium and low doses of
BLP-IpaB/D responded only after the second vaccination. The influence of the
vaccine dose in the magnitude of serum IgG responses was particularly noticeable
at this time point (Figure 3a). Although
titers increased and reached a plateau after the 3rd vaccination in
all groups, the recipients of the BLP-IpaB/D Max dose remained the best
responders throughout. The BLP-IpaB/D Max was also the only group that developed
significant and sustained IpaB-specific IgA responses in stool (Figure 3b). Stool IgA responses against IpaD were also
detected but did not follow a dose-response pattern. No antibodies were detected
in serum or stool from BLP and PBS controls. Importantly, the IgG responses to
IpaB and IpaD markedly improved when displayed on the BLP as compared to the
proteins given alone. BLP-IpaB/D recipients achieved ~3 and 5 log10
higher IpaB and IpaD serum IgG titers, respectively, than those that received
IpaB and IpaD alone. In fact only the group that received the max dose of IpaB
and IpaD alone developed a response above the negative controls. Fecal IgA
responses were absent following immunization with IpaB/D alone.
Figure 3
Serum IgG, stool IgA and protective efficacy of BLP-IpaB/D and IpaB/D in
adult mice
Adult mice were immunized i.n. with increasing dosage levels (maximum, high,
medium and low) of BLP-IpaB/D or IpaB/D alone: BLP carrying 20 μg IpaB
and 53 μg IpaD (BLP-IpaB/D-Max), 10 μg IpaB and 40 μg
IpaD (BLP-IpaB/D-High), 5 μg IpaB and 20 μg IpaD
(BLP-IpaB/D-Med), and 2.5 μg of IpaB and 10 μg of IpaD
(BLP-IpaB/D-Low). The same amounts of IpaB and IpaD were given alone.
(a) Kinetics of IpaB and IpaD serum IgG (b) and
stool IgA titers measured by ELISA. Each data point represents the geometric
mean titer in log10 of at least 10 mice per group ± SEM.
(c) Mice were challenged with wild-type S.
flexneri 2a 2457T or S. sonnei 53G 28 days after
the third immunization; the curves represent % survival post-challenge
for 10 mice per group. (d) Serum IgG titers and (e)
protection following S. flexneri challenge in mice immunized
with BLP-IpaB/D-Max or IpaB/D alone in 2 separate experiments. Significant
overall differences in log10 antibody titers were determined by
MANOVA. Significant differences in titers between all vaccinated groups were
analyzed by ANOVA with Tukey-Kramer multiple comparison test to compare all
groups. * P<0.05 for mean antibody titers
significantly higher compared to all other groups (panels a and b) and compared
to Ipas alone and controls (panel d). Significant differences in survival curves
were determined by log-rank test; * P<0.05 compared
to PBS and BLP.
One month after vaccination all mice were subjected to a lethal pulmonary
challenge with fully virulent S. flexneri strain 2a 2457T. Mice
immunized with BLP-IpaB/D had the highest survival rates: 90% for those
that received the maximum dose and 60% in the high and medium dose
groups (Figure 3c). Protection was
dramatically reduced when IpaB and IpaD were given alone: less than half
(40%) of the mice that received the maximum dose survived and only
10% of those that received the high dose (statistically
indistinguishable from the unvaccinated controls) survived. When challenged with
wild-type S. sonnei, which together with S. flexneri
2a cause the majority of endemic pediatric shigellosis in the
developing world, the BLP-IpaB/D Max dose afforded 80% protection; none
of the other vaccine groups exhibited significant protection against this strain
(Figure 3c). Negligent protection
against S. sonnei and S. flexneri
(≤20%) was seen occasionally in mice that received BLP alone,
whereas all unvaccinated (PBS) controls succumbed to infection 6 to 8 days after
challenge (Figures 3c and d). Results were
consistent when different batches of vaccine were tested in separate experiments
both in terms of kinetics of antibody production and BLP-immune enhancement
(Figure 3d), as well as protective
efficacy (Figure 3e).
IpaB- and IpaD antibodies and prediction of protection by titer and
functional capacity
A detailed statistical analysis was performed to establish potential
associations between vaccine-induced antibody responses (IgG, IgG1 and IgG2a in
serum and IgA in stool) and protection against disease. First, survival rates
post challenge were compared among mice immunized with BLP-IpaB/D or IpaB/D
classified as responders vs. non-responders. Serum IgG titers ≥ 50 EU
ml−1 and stool IgA titers ≥ 10 EU
ml−1 were considered the threshold for a positive
response (corresponding to 4 times the lower limits of detection, which was also
4 times the titer for all unvaccinated controls) (Table 1). The proportion of survivors was
significantly higher among mice that had developed positive responses for IgG
and IgG2a against both IpaB and IpaD in serum and IgA against IpaB in stool,
compared to non-responders (P<0.05, two-sided Fisher exact
test). Furthermore, there was a significant association between survival and the
magnitude of serum ELISA titers for each type of antibody measured
(P<0.05, likelihood ratio test in logistic regression)
(Table 1). Vaccinated mice that were
protected from S. flexneri infection (i.e. healthy survivors
that maintained at least 80% of body weight) had significantly higher
serum IgG titers anti-IpaB and IpaD than those that succumbed to infection at
the time of challenge (Figure 4a). A
further analysis of vaccine-induced antibodies and probability of survival using
logistic regression confirmed the association between IpaB- and IpaD-specific
IgG and protection (P<0.001). The models indicated that an
IpaB titer ≥1×106 EU ml−1
predicted at least an 80% chance of survival (60% if the titer
dropped to 1×105 EU ml−1) and an IpaD
titer ≥1×105 EU ml−1 predicted at
least 60% probability of survival (Figure
4b).
Table 1
Association between vaccine-induced antibodies and survival rates
post-challenge
Survival vs. antibody
responsesa
Survival and ELISA titersa
No. mice
Survival rates among responders
Survival rates among non-responders
pb
Odds ratioc
95% CId
pe
IpaB total IgG
80
27/65
1/15
0.016
3.46
1.89–6.33
<0.0001
IpaD total IgG
80
24/44
4/36
<0.0001
1.76
1.30–2.38
<0.0001
IpaB IgG1
20
12/19
0/1
0.80
2.74
0.93–8.08
0.038
IpaB IgG2a
20
10/12
2/8
0.031
3.00
1.17–7.73
0.007
IpaD IgG1
20
10/13
2/7
0.10
2.31
1.12–4.78
0.011
IpaD IgG2a
20
6/6
6/14
0.048
--f
--f
0.0002
IpaB stool IgA
80
10/11
18/69
0.0002
19.76
2.54–153.87
<0.0001
IpaD stool IgA
80
6/9
22/71
0.087
4.65
1.08–20.07
0.024
Mice were classified as responders or non-responders according to the total
serum IgG, IgG1, IgG2a or stool IgA ELISA titers at
day 56 after immunization. A titer of at least 50 ELISA units
ml−1, corresponding to 4 times the lower limit of
detection (12.5 EU ml−1) was considered a positive
response in serum and a titer of at least 10 ELISA units
ml−1, corresponding to 4 times the lower limit of
detection (2.5 EU ml−1) was considered a positive
response in stool. Survivors were mice that remained alive 14 days after
pulmonary challenge with S. flexneri 2a. Total IgG and IgA
titers were measured in mice immunized with max, high, med and low
BLP-IpaB/D and IpaB/D dosage levels; subclasses were measured in mice that
received the max dose.
p-value from two-sided Fisher’s exact test.
Odds ratio for survival from logistic regression for an increase of 1 in
log10(titer).
Confidence interval for odds ratio, based on Wald test.
p-value from likelihood ratio test.
Calculation did not converge; all mice that died were non-responders (i.e.,
had titers <50 ELISA units ml−1).
Figure 4
Antibodies and protection analysis, functional activity (opsonophagocytosis
and neutralization of cytotoxicity) and IgG subclasses
Mice were immunized with BLP-IpaB/D or IpaB/D Max (20 μg IpaB and 53
μg IpaD), as described in Figure 3.
(a) Antibody titers measured before challenge and ranked
according to survival outcome; circles denote mice immunized with BLP-IpaB/D,
and squares mice immunized with IpaB/D. Higher levels of IpaB or IpaD-specific
serum IgG were associated with protection (survival) by logistic regression on
log10-transformed IpaB or IpaD titers; * denotes
P < 0.001 by likelihood ratio test in both analyses.
(b) Estimated survival probability by logistic regression on
log-transformed IpaB or IpaD IgG titers (same analysis as for panel a); mice
immunized with BLP-IpaB/D-Max and IpaB/D-Max were included and depicted as
circles and square, respectively. Filled and solid circles represent surviving
and non-surviving mice, respectively. Dashed lines indicate level of antibodies
predicting >60% survival. (c) Opsonophagocytic activity
of serum antibodies from vaccine and control groups. Results are shown as mean
% opsonophagocytic uptake of S. flexneri 2a 2457T in
individual serum samples. (d) IpaB- and IpaD-specific IgG1 and
IgG2a subclasses determined by ELISA; data represent mean titers from 20 mice
per group. (e) Neutralization of macrophage cytotoxicity by serum
from different treatment groups. Results are shown as mean %
neutralization from replicate wells by pooled serum samples. In panels c and d,
individual measurements from vaccine and control groups were compared by one-way
ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test against a common control;
the tests on IpaB- and Ipa-D-specific subclasses were done using
log10-transformed antibody titers. * denotes
P < 0.05 compared to non-serum or PBS for OPA and to PBS
for subclasses.
Given the observed correlation between protection against disease and
vaccine-induced humoral responses, we investigated the functional capacity of
IpaB and IpaD antibodies in facilitating bacterial uptake by phagocytic cells
and preventing Shigella-induced cytotoxicity. Antibodies
induced by BLP-IpaB/D and IpaB/D exhibited opsonophagocytic activity (OPA) seen
by the increased uptake of serum-opsonized S. flexneri 2a 2457T
by mouse macrophages, compared to a non-opsonized organism or organisms
opsonized with non-immune serum (Figure
4c). The highest OPA responses were seen in the group immunized with
BLP-IpaB/D (Figure 4c). These results
prompted us to examine the IgG subclass profile induced by the two vaccine
treatments to test the hypothesis that the higher OPA could be associated with
an increased proportion of antibodies with higher binding capacity for
phagocytic cells. Indeed, higher IgG2a levels were produced after immunization
with BLP-IpaB/D as compared to IpaB/D alone (Figure 4d). Additionally, we measured the capacity of
vaccine-induced antibodies to neutralize macrophage cytotoxicity in the presence
of wild-type Shigella. Sera from mice immunized with BLP-IpaB/D
and IpaB/D prevented Shigella-induced cell death compared to
non-immune sera from mice that received PBS (Figure 4e).
Mucosal ASC, antibodies and innate immune mediators in bronchoalveolar fluid
(BALf)
To further assess the mucosal responses induced by BLP-IpaB/D
immunization, we measured the frequency of IpaB- and IpaD-specific ASC in the
nasal-associated lymphoid tissue (NALT) and lung, as well as the levels of
IpaB/D-specific IgG and IgA in BALf, one week after the 3rd and final
immunization (Figures 5a and b). High
numbers of IpaB-specific IgGASC were detected in the NALT of BLP-IpaB/D
vaccinated mice (Figure 5a). An even higher
IpaB-specific ASC response was found in the lungs (Figure 5b). Likewise, IpaD-specific IgGASC were detected in the
lungs, albeit at much lower numbers. IpaB and IpaD-specific IgA ASC were induced
in response to BLP-IpaB/D, but their magnitude was marginal compared to the IgGASC. In all cases, the ASC responses in the BLP-IpaB/D group surpassed those of
mice that received IpaB/D alone. Elevated IpaB- and IpaD-specific IgG titers
were found in BALf, and, similar to the ASC, there was a trend of higher
responses in the BLP-IpaB/D recipients compared to those immunized with IpaB/D
alone (Figure 5c). No specific antibodies
or ASC were detected in the BLP and PBS controls. A summary of serum and mucosal
antibody responses in all groups and the corresponding protection levels is
given in Table 2. From a large panel of
cytokines measured by microarrays (IFN-γ, IL-10, IL-12, IL-2, IL-4,
IL-5, KC, and TNF-α) IL-1β, IL-12 and the neutrophil-attracting
chemokine, keratinocyte chemoattractant (KC), were found to be elevated in the
BALf of vaccinated mice (Figure 5d). The
highest levels were found in the group immunized with BLP-IpaB/D, but positive
responses (above the unvaccinated PBS controls) were also found in the IpaB/D
and BLP groups (Figure 5d).
Figure 5
Mucosal IgA and IgG secreting cells, antibodies and cytokines following
BLP-IpaB/D and IpaB/D vaccination
Mice were immunized with BLP-IpaB/D or IpaB/D Max dose as described in Figure 3. IgA and IgG ASC were measured by
ELISpot in the (a) NALT and (b) lung tissue 35 days
after the first immunization. Data correspond to mean ASC counts per
106 cells measured in pooled cell suspensions from 5 mice in each
group + SEM from triplicate wells. (c) IpaB- and
IpaD-specific IgG and IgA were measured by ELISA in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid
(BALf) 35 days after immunization; data represent mean of individual titers from
5 mice per group (d). Cytokines measured in BALf by MSD multiarray
technology; data represent mean concentrations as (pg ml−1) +
SEM from triplicate wells.
Table 2
Antibody titers measured in serum and mucosal secretions and protective
efficacy
Serum IgGa
Stool IgAa
BALf IgGb
BALf IgAb
Survivalc
IpaB
IpaD
IpaB
IpaD
IpaB
IpaD
IpaB
IpaD
S. flexneri
S. sonnei
BLP-Ipa Max
310,021
109,915
37.9
6.6
2,616
1,095
145.9
19.2
90
80
IpaB/D Max
918.1
25.2
2.5
2.5
315.5
57.2
29.2
12.5
40
20
BLP
12.5
13.4
2.5
2.5
18.4
12.5
12.5
12.5
0
20
PBS
12.5
12.5
2.5
2.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
0
0
Serum and stool values are provided as geometric mean titers (EU
ml−1) from 10 mice per group measured on Day 55 (time
of challenge).
BALf was collected from 5 mice per group on day 35 following the initial
vaccination. Geometric mean titers are provided in EU
ml−1.
Survival is listed as the percentage of 10 mice per group surviving lethal
pulmonary challenge with the indicated Shigella
organism.
Systemic ASC responses and bone marrow adoptive transfer protection
We also examined the presence of antigen-specific ASC in the spleen and
in the bone marrow (BM) as potential sources of circulating antibodies and
long-lived plasma cells, respectively. IpaB- and IpaD-specific IgG and IgA ASC
were found in both tissues mainly in response to BLP-IpaB/D vaccination, whereas
no ASCs were detected after vaccination with IpaB/D alone (Figures 6a and b). In most instances, the levels of
IgGASC surpassed those of IgA ASC. BM cells from BLP-IpaB/D recipients
adoptively transferred to naïve mice conferred moderate, yet significant
protection against lethal Shigella infection; 40% of
the BM recipients survived the pulmonary challenge (Figure 6c).
Figure 6
Systemic IgG and IgA ASC and induced by the BLP-IpaB/D and IpaB/D and
protection by bone marrow adoptive transfer
Mice were immunized with BLP-IpaB/D or IpaB/D-Max as described in Figure 3. (a) IgA and IgG ASC measured by
ELISpot in spleen and (b) bone marrow (BM) on day 69 after primary
immunization. Data correspond to mean ASC counts per 106 cells from
pooled cell suspensions from 5 mice in each group + SEM from triplicate
wells. (c) Bone marrow cells from BLP-IpaB/D or PBS recipients
(obtained 69 days after primary vaccination) were adoptively transferred to
naïve mice that were challenged 48 h later with wild type S.
flexneri 2a 2457T. Survival curves were compared by log-rank test;
* P<0.05 compared to PBS.
Antibody responses and protective efficacy of BLP-IpaB/D in newborn
mice
Considering that infants and toddlers would be the main targets of a
Shigella vaccine and that immune responses may be
influenced by age and immune development, we examined the protective capacity of
BLP-IpaB/IpaD in mice immunized as newborns and infants. Seven-day-old mice were
administered BLP-IpaB/D or IpaB/D via the nasal route and identical booster
doses were given on days 14, 21 and 28 after birth. A series of preliminary
studies was performed to determine optimal doses and number of booster
immunizations needed to maximize protection. Because the serum IgG anti-IpaD
levels were consistently low, the amount of IpaD was increased to the highest
that could be included in the vaccine inoculum (24 μg in 10 μl).
A three-dose regimen with BLP-IpaB/D, which was highly successful in adults,
provided only ~40% protection in mice immunized as newborns (data not
shown) and hence a fourth dose was added after weaning (day 28). Immunization
with BLP-IpaB/D during the neonatal/infant period resulted in significant levels
of IpaB- and IpaD-specific serum IgG. As observed in adult mice, antibody
responses markedly increased when the Ipas were displayed on the BLP.
Immunization with BLP-IpaB/D elicited serum IgG responses against both IpaB and
IpaD, whereas lower IpaB- and barely significant (and delayed) IpaD-specific IgG
was produced in response to IpaB/D alone (Figure
7a). Newborn/infant immunization with BLP-IpaB/D afforded 90%
protection against S. flexneri 2a and 44% against
S. sonnei, which in both cases was significant above the
unvaccinated controls (Figure 7b).
Protection was greatly reduced upon immunization with IpaB/D alone; only
30% of these mice survived S. flexneri challenge and
only 11% survived infection with S. sonnei.
Figure 7
Serum IgG levels and protective efficacy of BLP-IpaB/D and IpaB/D in newborn
mice
Mice were immunized as newborns and infants with BLP carrying 2 μg IpaB
and 24 μg IpaD or with the same amounts of IpaB and IpaD given alone.
Control groups received BLP alone or remained naïve. Vaccines were given
on days 7, 14, 21 and 28 after birth (arrows). (a) IpaB- and
IpaD-specific IgG measured by ELISA; data represent geometric mean titers from
12 mice per group. Significant overall differences in log10 antibody
titers were determined by MANOVA. Significant differences in titers between all
vaccinated groups were analyzed by ANOVA with Tukey-Kramer multiple comparison
test to compare all groups. * P<0.05 for mean
antibody titers significantly higher compared to BLP and PBS control groups.
#
P<0.05 for mean antibody titers significantly higher
compared to all groups. (b) Protection against lethal pulmonary
infection with wild type S. flexneri 2a 2457T or S.
sonnei 53G (n=12). Survival curves were compared by
log-rank test. * P<0.05 compared to naïve
mice. # P<0.05 compared to all groups.
DISCUSSION
The recent estimates of moderate-to-severe diarrhea attributable to
Shigella spp. in children living in Asia and sub-Saharan
Africa[1] re-emphasize the
urgent need for effective preventive strategies to reduce mortality rates and
alleviate an overall disease burden that results in long-lasting health impairment.
Herein, we provide the first report of successful immunization of adult and
newborn/infantmice with L. lactisBLP displaying
ShigellaIpaB and IpaD. The vaccine was well tolerated when
administered via the nasal route as early as one week after birth and induced robust
immune responses. Most importantly, it was highly protective against lethal
challenge with S. flexneri 2a and S. sonnei 53G,
the two most prevalent endemic serotypes in the developing world as reported by the
GEMS[18] and previous
large-scale studies.[19,20] Immunogenicity and protection were
dose-dependent and consistent in multiple experiments using different vaccine lots.
The safety and suitability of the BLP-IpaB/D vaccine for mucosal delivery and its
capacity to induce strong cross-protective immunity in young hosts make it unique
and appealing for the immunization of toddlers and young children, who would benefit
the most from a practical and effective prophylactic approach.The BLP exhibited distinct adjuvant properties and contributed to the
protective immunity achieved. Display of IpaB and IpaD on the L.
lactis particles significantly increased the magnitude of systemic and
mucosal antibody and ASC responses, innate immune mediators in mucosal secretions
and importantly, the survival rate post challenge. It is noteworthy that robust
serum IgG responses to IpaD, typically the less immunogenic of the two proteins,
were only elicited when it was displayed on the BLP. Similarly, stool IgA was
detected only in mice that received BLP-IpaB/D, not in the IpaB/D recipients. This
immune enhancement could be explained by a more efficient B cell activation and
antigen delivery to APC, and/or by the inherent adjuvant properties of the
BLP.[21,22] Displayed on the BLP surface, the proteins
are less likely to suffer degradation and, due to the microbial size and surface
charge of the particles, they are more easily captured by activated APC than soluble
proteins alone.[10,23] We have shown that the L.
lactis BLP bind TLR2 in vitro and activate adult and neonatal dendritic
cells (from both mice and humans), enhance their maturation and capacity for antigen
presentation and stimulate the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines including
TNF-α and IL-6.[10]
Similarly, the interaction of BLP with TLR2 in vivo has been associated with the
induction of mucosal IgA responses, as well as splenic IgGASC and
IFN-γ-secreting T cells following co-administration of a split influenza
virus vaccine.[11]The immunological effectors and the precise mechanisms by which IpaB and
IpaD mediate protection against Shigella lethal pulmonary infection
in the mouse model are not fully understood. Presumably, antibodies produced locally
and/or transudated from circulation impede bacterial-host cell contact (and inhibit
translocation of virulence factors) at the mucosal epithelial interface, thereby
preventing tissue damage and bacterial spread.[4,6] Antibodies may also
facilitate uptake of organisms by phagocytic cells. A detailed statistical analysis
of BLP-IpaB/D and IpaB/D-induced antibodies and rates of survival from multiple
experiments revealed a categorical association between a serum antibody response to
each of the proteins and protection against lethal experimental challenge. Survival
was also associated with the magnitude of serum IgG (and IgG2a) ELISA titers; the
stronger the antibody response, the higher the likelihood of vaccinated mice
withstanding the lethal infection, with threshold serum IpaB- and IpaD-specific IgG
titers of 1×105 EU ml−1 predicting at least
60% survival.A new and critical observation was the capacity of IpaB and IpaD antibodies
generated through vaccination to reduce Shigella-induced macrophage
cytotoxicity and facilitate their uptake of bacteria through opsonophagocytosis.
These functional properties are important to prevent tissue damage and further
microbial spread during Shigella infection, and might represent
mechanisms of host defense in vivo. Antibodies generated by the BLP-IpaB/D vaccine
elicited higher OPA activity (P<0.01), which could be explained by the larger
proportion of IgG2a induced, compared to the Ipas alone. Unlike IgG1, IgG2a binds
the FcγRI receptor on mouse macrophages and phagocytic cells[24] with high affinity and is
therefore more efficient at activating these cells and promoting microbial
clearance. In line with these results, we and others had shown that the BLP promote
more balanced Th1/Th2 responses to the carried antigens compared with the same
antigens given alone or admixed with alum, which generate a distinct Th2-biased IgG1
response[10,17] that is unsuited for the elimination of
intracellular pathogens, particularly in the Th2-prevailing environment early in
life.[25]Among the systemic effectors induced by BLP-IpaB/D immunization, it is worth
mentioning the IpaB and IpaD-specific BM ASC (representing long-lived plasma cells
or their plasmablasts precursors) that partly protected naïve hosts, as this
suggests the potential for this vaccine to elicit effectors that can mediate
long-lasting protective immunity. In addition, the BLP-IpaB/D generated potent
mucosal immune responses largely represented by IpaB and IpaD-specific IgGASC in
the NALT and lungs, and high levels of IpaB and IpaD-specific IgG in BALf. Some of
the antibodies detected in the BALf were absent in serum (i.e., IgA and
IpaD-specific IgG in IpaB/D recipients), which suggests that vaccine-induced local
ASC produce some of the mucosal antibodies detected. An interesting observation was
the predominance of IgG responses in mucosal tissues (NALT and lung ASC, and BALf)
as opposed to IgA, which was still sufficient to confer high levels of protection.
In humans, serum IgG specific for Shigella LPS has been associated
with serotype-specific protection [26-30] and it
has been proposed that these antibodies transudate the mucosal epithelial barrier
and neutralize and/or kill the organisms in the gut lumen.[31] The relative contribution of serum and
mucosal antibodies in protection against shigellosis and the mechanisms involved
remain to be elucidated.Another relevant observation was the presence of innate immune mediators
(IL-12, IL-1β and mKC) in lung secretions from BLP-IpaB/D recipients. IL-12
plays a major role in host defense against intracellular pathogens by activating
macrophages and inducing IFN-γ production. Likewise, KC (CXCL1), a chemokine
produced by macrophages and neutrophils (via TLR2 activation pathway), recruits and
activates phagocytic cells. ShigellaIpaB has been attributed with
initiating the inflammatory response through caspase-1, by promoting secretion of
IL-1β.[32] In a
concerted manner, these molecules can facilitate bacterial clearance synergizing
with host adaptive immune effectors. This is, to the best of our knowledge, the
first demonstration of these cytokines/chemokines being present in mucosal
secretions following immunization with a Shigella or BLP
vaccine.In an attempt to identify the tissues involved in vaccine uptake, we tracked
the in vivo distribution of i.n. delivered fBLP. The particles localized in the NALT
the first few hours after inoculation and subsequently in the gut; they were also
found in the lungs for up to at least 24 hours. Antigen-specific ASC were detected
in NALT and lung, and it is therefore reasonable to assume their involvement in
immunological priming. The 30 μl inoculum volume administered is consistent
with particles spreading from the nasal cavity into the lungs, as we have observed
in mice given live bacterial vaccines[33]. Others have similarly reported >10 μl intranasal
instillations dispersing into the bronchial region as well as the gastrointestinal
tract.[34] However, in
humans, delivery of a BLP vaccine would be directed to the nasal cavity targeting
the NALT as the primary inductive site. The fBLP presumably reached the gut through
the swallowing reflex and this likely represents the route excretion. However, some
immune activation might have occurred there as well, as suggested by the presence of
IgA in stool, while completely absent in circulation. Since
Shigella is an enteric pathogen, immunological priming in the
gut and induction of local (intestinal) immunity would be an advantageous feature of
any new vaccine. We had previously reported that oral delivery of IpaB and IpaD
resulted in lower protective efficacy than intranasal vaccination[4] and therefore this route was not pursued in
the BLP-IpaB/D studies. Since experimental infection of mice with
Shigella involves nasal/pulmonary exposure (as opposed to
enteric in humans), oral vaccination adds a confounding factor to the proper
evaluation of vaccine candidates in this model.An additional important benefit of the BLP technology is that it allows for
successful mucosal (even intranasal) immunization, without the need for potentially
reactogenic adjuvants. In previous work from our group, IpaB/D delivered i.n.,
admixed with a double mutant of the Escherichia coli heat labile
toxin (dmLT), afforded similar protection to that described here for the BLP-IpaB/D,
using a smaller dose. However, due to safety concerns, an enterotoxin-derived
adjuvant would not be suitable for use in humans.[35] Parenteral immunization with the IpaB/D plus
dmLT was likewise effective in mice[6] and potentially suitable for use in children; a drawback is that
it would still require special tools (i.e. microneedles) and might not be as
practical as mucosal delivery. The BLP were well tolerated when given to 15 human
adults via the nasal route (1.25 mg of BLP in 250 μl) mixed with a
commercial influenza vaccine.[21] If
equally safe in children, this route might provide an alternative to oral
vaccination, which is known to yield less than desired immune responses to routine
vaccines in developing countries.[36] Supportive of this concept are the results of Mallet et
al[37] and Orr et
al[38], whereby intranasal
immunization with a proteosome-based S. sonnei and S.
flexneri vaccine induced homologous protection in mice and in the
guinea pigkeratoconjunctivitis model, respectively. While none of these models
accurately represent the course of Shigella infection in humans,
these results confirm the potential of a mucosal/ intranasal subunit vaccine
approach.Pre-clinical studies of Shigella vaccine candidates have
traditionally involved immunization of adult hosts. Two recent reports investigated
protection of young animals through passive protection from maternally derived
antibodies.[39,40] Gnobiotic piglets have been used to evaluate
live vaccine strains.[41] Ours is,
to the best of our knowledge, the first demonstration of substantial cross
protective immunity in mice immunized as newborns with a protein-based vaccine.
Although the protection against S. sonnei was lower than
anticipated, it could be improved through optimization of vaccine dose and regimen;
it may also reflect a more stringent challenge procedure.In conclusion, the BLP-IpaB/D vaccine is a promising candidate for
immunization of young children against shigellosis. Advantages of this vaccine over
other approaches include its safety, suitability for mucosal delivery (which makes
it a practical for large scale use), strong immunogenicity and broad protective
capacity. Our results warrant further assessment of this concept in humans.
METHODS
Preparation of vaccines and antigens
Recombinant IpaB and IpaD were purified by affinity and size exclusion
chromatography as previously described.[5,42] To be loaded
onto the L. lactisBLP particles (formerly called Gram
Enhancement Matrix particles), each protein was expressed as a fusion containing
the peptidoglycan anchoring (PA) domain (IpaB-PA and IpaD-PA). The plasmid
construction, expression and purification of IpaD-PA has been described
elsewhere.[43] IpaB-PA
was produced by inserting the DNA sequence for PA 5′ to the
ipaB sequence in pACYC-Duet as previously
described.[44] The
purification of IpaB-PA was the same as for IpaB. L. lactisBLP
were produced by boiling L. lactis whole cells in 10%
trichloroacetic acid for 30 min, followed by extensive washing in PBS, as
previously described.[8] One mg
of BLP contains approximately 8×109 particles. To produce
BLP-IpaD, L. lactis cell-free culture supernatants containing
IpaD-PA and BLP were mixed under gentle rotation for 30 min at room temperature
as described elsewhere.[8] To
produce BLP-IpaB, BLP were incubated with purified IpaB-PA for 30 min with
gentle rocking at room temperature. Removal of excess IpaB or IpaD-PA was
achieved by three sequential centrifugation of the particles, removal of the
supernatants, and resuspension. The resulting vaccine preparations BLP-IpaB and
BLP-IpaD (along with IpaB and IpaD alone) were analyzed by Sodium Dodecyl
Sulfate-Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis (SDS PAGE). Samples were diluted 1:2
in Laemmli sample buffer® (BioRad, Hercules, CA) containing 5%
2β-Mercaptoethanol, boiled at 95°C for 10 min and loaded (1
μg/well) in a 4–12% pre-casted Mini-PROTEAN TGX
Gel® (BioRad, Hercules, CA). The separated proteins were detected by
Coomassie staining (EZ blue™) (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). The
amount of IpaB-PA and IpaD-PA bound to the BLP was determined by SDS PAGE using
IpaB-PA or bovine serum albumin as standard, respectively. The BLP-IpaB/D and
IpaB/D vaccine components were stored at −80°C until use.The BLP-IpaB and BLP-IpaD were further analyzed by dual color
immunofluorescence. Briefly, suspensions containing 100 μl of BLP-IpaB
and BLP-IpaD were washed with ultrapure water (Milli-Q, Millipore, Billerica,
MA), resuspended in PBS containing 2% Bovine serum albumin (BSA, Sigma,
St. Louis, MO) and incubated for one hour at room temperature with biotinylated
mouse anti-IpaB or anti-IpaD monoclonal antibodies (a gift from Dr. Ed Oaks).
After washing, BLP-IpaD samples were incubated with anti-mouse Alexa
Fluor® 488 (Molecular Probes, Grand Island, NY) and BLP-IpaB samples
with Streptavidin Alexa Fluor® 598 (Molecular Probes, Grand Island, NY);
1:50 and 1:200, dilutions, respectively, in PBS containing 2% BSA for
one hour at room temperature. After washing, samples were resuspended in 100
μl of ultrapure water, and a 10-μl sample was air dried onto a
microscope slide and applied ProLong® Gold antifade reagent (Life
Technologies, Eugene, OR) along with a coverslip. Images were acquired at
100× magnification on a Zeiss Axio Imager Z.1 fluorescence microscope
using ZEN Imaging Software (Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Oberkochen, Germany).
In vivo tracking of L. lactis BLP
The BLP particles were labeled with Alexa Fluor® 790
Succinimidyl Esters (NHS esters) purchased from Molecular Probes, Grand Island,
NY, through chemical binding to non-protonated aliphatic amine groups on the
particle surface. Briefly, the BLP (15 mg) were washed and resuspended in 0.1M
NaHC03 pH 8.3, and incubated with 1 μg of Alexa
Fluor® 790 for 1 h at 4°C in the dark and with agitation.
Adequate labeling (>80%) was confirmed by flow cytometry. The
fluorescent BLP (fBLP) were washed three times in PBS and resuspended to a final
concentration of 10 mg ml−1 in PBS containing 0.01%
thimerosal (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). Adult female Balb/c mice (Charles
River Laboratories, Wilmington, MA) were placed in an anesthesia induction
chamber (Piramal Healthcare, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India) dispensing Isoflurane
(Fluriso™, VETone®, Boise, ID)
2.5% and, once fully anesthetized, 30 μl of fBLP (0.3mg) were
administered i.n. The mice were then moved to the imaging chamber of a Xenogen
IVIS-200 system (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA) and placed lying on their backs on a
heated shelf surface to maintain body temperature. Isoflurane (0.5%) was
administered through nose cones during imaging. Pictures were taken and analyzed
using Living Image® Software Version 4.3.1 (Perkin Elmer),
creating gates or Regions of Interest (ROIs). The fluorescent intensity
(Epi-fluorescence) of the fBLP was measured as radiant efficiency using the
flowing equation: . The background was defined as the ROI (nasal
tissue, lungs or intestine) of mice that received unlabeled BLP.
Immunization, cell adoptive transfer and experimental infection
Female Balb/c adult mice (7–8 weeks old) were immunized i.n. on
days 0, 14 and 28 with increasing doses of BLP-IpaB and BLP-IpaD or IpaB and
IpaD (alone): 2.5 μg IpaB and 10 μg IpaD, referred to as
BLP-IpaB/D-Low; 5 μg IpaB and 20 μg IpaD (BLP-IpaB/D-Med); 10
μg IpaB and 40 μg IpaD (BLP-IpaB/D-High), and 20 μg of
IpaB and 53 μg of IpaD (BLP-IpaB/D-Max). The amount of BLP given with
each vaccine was consistently 300 μg. The Max dose was the largest
amount of BLP-IpaB/D that could be given in the 30 μl inoculum volume.
Other groups received equivalent doses of IpaB and IpaD (without BLP), also
referred to as IpaB/D-Low, IpaB/D-Med, IpaB/D-High and IpaB/D-Max, respectively.
Newborn (7-days old) mice received 2 μg IpaB and 24 μg IpaD
alone or displayed onto the BLP (in a 10 μl volume), on days 7, 14, 21
and 28 after birth. In both experiments, unvaccinated controls received BLP
alone or PBS. The vaccine inoculum was dispensed half into each nare, with a
pipette and under Isoflurane anesthesia, as previously described.[4] Serum and fecal samples were
obtained from individual mice before and every two weeks after vaccination.
Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, NALT, spleen and BM cells were collected from
subgroups of mice at days 35 or 69 as described before.[4,5]
For adoptive transfer experiments, BM cells obtained on day 69 post-vaccination
were injected i.v. to adult mice; 6×107 cells in 100
μl of PBS were administered to each recipient via the tail vein. One
month after the last immunization (day 56) or 48 h after cell adoptive transfer,
adult mice were challenged with 6×107 CFU virulent S.
flexneri 2a 2457T (corresponding to ~11 MLD50) or with
1.3×108 CFU of S. sonnei 53G
(corresponding to ~6 MLD50), as previously described.[4,5] Newborn mice were challenged with
3×107 CFU of S. flexneri 2a 2457T
(corresponding to ~3 MLD50) or with 9.35×107 CFU
of S. sonnei 53G. All animal studies and procedures were
approved by the University of Maryland Institutional Animal Care and Use
Committee.
Antibody measurements
(i) ELISA IpaB- and IpaD- specific antibodies were measured
by ELISA as previously described. [4,5]
(ii) Opsonophagocytosis. A Shigella
opsonophagocytic assay was developed following previously described
format[45], with
modifications. Briefly, J774A.1mouse macrophages were seeded into 24-well
plates (2×105 cells per well) and grown in Dulbecco’s
modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) (Gibco, Grand Island, NY) supplemented with
10% Defined Fetal Bovine Serum (GE Healthcare HyClone, Logan, UT) at
37°C, 5% CO2, until they reached 90%
confluence. S. flexneri 2a wild type strain 2457T was grown
overnight at 37°C in Tryptic Soy Agar (TSA) (Difco, Becton Dickinson
Diagnostics, Sparks, MD) supplemented with 0.02% Congo Red
(Sigma-Aldrich), and isolated colonies were sub-cultured in Animal-Product-Free
Luria Bertani broth (Lennox) (Athena Enzyme Systems, Baltimore, MD) and grown at
37°C until reaching an optical density measured at a 600 nm wavelength
(OD600) of 0.2. Ninety μl bacterial suspension containing
~ 2–3×105 CFU were incubated with 10 μl of
individual serum samples (previously inactivated for 20 min at 56°C) for
20 min at room temperature, in constant rotation. A 10 μl aliquot of
opsonized organisms (2–3×104 CFU) was added to the
cell monolayers (in duplicate wells), centrifuged (10 min, 1,000 × g)
and incubated for 45 min. After washing with PBS, 500 μl of fresh medium
containing 100 μg ml−1 of gentamicin (Gibco) was
added for 1 h to remove external organisms. Cells were washed again, lysed with
500μl of PBS containing 0.5% Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich) and
supernatants (25 μl aliquots, in triplicate) were cultured overnight at
37°C in TSA-Congo Red to determine viable counts. The percent of
phagocytosis was calculated as the ratio of CFU recovered/CFU added to the wells
× 100. (iii) Neutralization of macrophage cytotoxicity.
Shigella is known to induce apoptosis of macrophages.[46] To determine whether serum
from immunized animals could prevent macrophage cytotoxicity upon exposure to
wild-type organisms, we established a cytotoxicity neutralization assay based on
methods previously described.[47-49] A 30
μl suspension of S. flexneri 2a strain 2457T, prepared
as described above and containing 2×105 CFU, was incubated
with 10 μl of mouse serum in 96-wells round bottom plates (in duplicate)
for 20 min at room temperature. The content of each well was then transferred to
a 96-well plate seeded with J774A.1 macrophages (3×103 per
well, moi: 60) and incubated for 18 h at 37°C, 5% CO2. The plate
was centrifuged and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release (an indicator of
cytotoxicity) was measured in 50 μl of culture supernatants using a
colorimetric assay (CytoTox 96, Promega, Madison, WI). Absorbances values at 490
nm were measured using a Multiskan ELISA reader (Thermo Scientific).
Cytotoxicity (cell death) was determined as: (experimental LDH
release–spontaneous LDH release)/(maximum LDH
release–spontaneous LDH release), where spontaneous LDH release was the
LDH activity in supernatants from cells incubated in medium alone and total LDH
release the activity in lysed macrophages. Percent neutralization was calculated
as 1-cell death ×100.
ASC and cytokines
IgA and IgGASC were measured by ELISpot as previously
described.[4,5] Cytokines were measured in alveolar
lavages or in culture supernatants from cells stimulated with IpaB or IpaD,
using a MSD® MouseTh1/Th2 Multi-array®
tissue culture kit (Meso Scale Discovery, Rockville, MD), as previously
described.[4,6]
Statistical analysis
Overall differences over time in % fluorescence and antibody
responses (in serum and stool) were assessed by multivariate analysis of
variance (MANOVA), using the different each time points measured as variables.
Comparisons between vaccinated groups at specific time points were made using
one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the Tukey-Kramer multiple comparisons
test. Survival for serum IgG responders (titers ≥ 50 ELISA Units
ml−1) and non-responders (<50 ELISA Units
ml−1) and stool IgA responders (titers ≥ 10 ELISA
Units ml−1) and non-responders (<10 ELISA Units
ml−1) were analyzed by a Fisher exact test, with the
two-sided p-value calculated as twice the one-sided p-value in the direction of
the observed difference. Associations between probability of survival and serum
IgG titers were evaluated using logistic regression models. Survival after
challenge was assessed by Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests. Two-sided
P≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. GraphPad Prism 6
software (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA), SAS version 9.3 (SAS
Institute, Cary, NC) and NCSS 8 (Number Cruncher Statistical Systems, Kaysville,
UT) were used for statistical analyses.
Authors: Maarten L van Roosmalen; Rolf Kanninga; Mohamed El Khattabi; Jolanda Neef; Sandrine Audouy; Tjibbe Bosma; Anneke Kuipers; Eduard Post; Anton Steen; Jan Kok; Girbe Buist; Oscar P Kuipers; George Robillard; Kees Leenhouts Journal: Methods Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 3.608
Authors: Tjibbe Bosma; Rolf Kanninga; Jolanda Neef; Sandrine A L Audouy; Maarten L van Roosmalen; Anton Steen; Girbe Buist; Jan Kok; Oscar P Kuipers; George Robillard; Kees Leenhouts Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: P J Sansonetti; A Phalipon; J Arondel; K Thirumalai; S Banerjee; S Akira; K Takeda; A Zychlinsky Journal: Immunity Date: 2000-05 Impact factor: 31.745
Authors: Sandrine A L Audouy; Saskia van Selm; Maarten L van Roosmalen; Eduard Post; Rolf Kanninga; Jolanda Neef; Silvia Estevão; Edward E S Nieuwenhuis; Peter V Adrian; Kees Leenhouts; Peter W M Hermans Journal: Vaccine Date: 2006-09-18 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: David J M Lewis; Zhiming Huo; Susan Barnett; Ingrid Kromann; Rafaela Giemza; Eva Galiza; Maria Woodrow; Birgit Thierry-Carstensen; Peter Andersen; Deborah Novicki; Giuseppe Del Giudice; Rino Rappuoli Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-09-16 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Karen L Kotloff; James P Nataro; William C Blackwelder; Dilruba Nasrin; Tamer H Farag; Sandra Panchalingam; Yukun Wu; Samba O Sow; Dipika Sur; Robert F Breiman; Abu Sg Faruque; Anita Km Zaidi; Debasish Saha; Pedro L Alonso; Boubou Tamboura; Doh Sanogo; Uma Onwuchekwa; Byomkesh Manna; Thandavarayan Ramamurthy; Suman Kanungo; John B Ochieng; Richard Omore; Joseph O Oundo; Anowar Hossain; Sumon K Das; Shahnawaz Ahmed; Shahida Qureshi; Farheen Quadri; Richard A Adegbola; Martin Antonio; M Jahangir Hossain; Adebayo Akinsola; Inacio Mandomando; Tacilta Nhampossa; Sozinho Acácio; Kousick Biswas; Ciara E O'Reilly; Eric D Mintz; Lynette Y Berkeley; Khitam Muhsen; Halvor Sommerfelt; Roy M Robins-Browne; Myron M Levine Journal: Lancet Date: 2013-05-14 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Shannon J Heine; Jovita Diaz-McNair; Abhay U Andar; Cinthia B Drachenberg; Lillian van de Verg; Richard Walker; Wendy L Picking; Marcela F Pasetti Journal: J Immunol Date: 2014-01-22 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: BreOnna C DeLaine; Tao Wu; Christen L Grassel; Avital Shimanovich; Marcela F Pasetti; Myron M Levine; Eileen M Barry Journal: Pathog Dis Date: 2016-04-21 Impact factor: 3.166
Authors: Katharina Richard; Barbara J Mann; Aiping Qin; Eileen M Barry; Robert K Ernst; Stefanie N Vogel Journal: Clin Vaccine Immunol Date: 2017-03-06
Authors: Shannon J Heine; Olga L Franco-Mahecha; Khandra T Sears; Cinthia B Drachenberg; Maarten L van Roosmalen; Kees Leenhouts; Wendy L Picking; Marcela F Pasetti Journal: J Immunol Date: 2019-02-20 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Mariana L Ferrari; Spyridoula N Charova; Philippe J Sansonetti; Efstratios Mylonas; Anastasia D Gazi Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol Date: 2021-04-29 Impact factor: 5.293