C O Z Guimarães1, E Bagatin2, L R S Guadanhim2, F Sternberg2, F R Picosse2, G Nunes2, C Milanez2, H A Miot3. 1. Dermatology Department, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil carolzerbini@hotmail.com. 2. Dermatology Department, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. 3. Dermatology and Radioterapy Department, UNESP, Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite the focus on facial photoaging ratings, there are few classifications developed for forearm skin aging assessment. OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a clinical scale for the evaluation of forearm skin aging. METHODS: Three clinical dermatology faculty members selected, discussed, and appraised the main signs of forearm photoaging. The validation of the resulting scale was performed by 5 assessors who were previously trained to classify 102 photographs of forearms with different degrees of aging. Retests were performed in 15 days. RESULTS: There was significant correlation between the selected variables and the subjective global aging scale. The developed scale showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's α=0.87) and high correlation with the global photoaging scale (rho=0.92). Inter- and intraobserver final scores showed high agreement. CONCLUSION: A validated clinical photoaging scale for forearms with internal consistency, reliability, and validity was developed.
BACKGROUND: Despite the focus on facial photoaging ratings, there are few classifications developed for forearm skin aging assessment. OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a clinical scale for the evaluation of forearm skin aging. METHODS: Three clinical dermatology faculty members selected, discussed, and appraised the main signs of forearm photoaging. The validation of the resulting scale was performed by 5 assessors who were previously trained to classify 102 photographs of forearms with different degrees of aging. Retests were performed in 15 days. RESULTS: There was significant correlation between the selected variables and the subjective global aging scale. The developed scale showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's α=0.87) and high correlation with the global photoaging scale (rho=0.92). Inter- and intraobserver final scores showed high agreement. CONCLUSION: A validated clinical photoaging scale for forearms with internal consistency, reliability, and validity was developed.