Nicholas Hatzirodos1, Katja Hummitzsch1, Helen F Irving-Rodgers2, Raymond J Rodgers1. 1. Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health, Robinson Research Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, 5005, Australia. 2. School of Medical Science, Griffith University, Gold Coast, 4222, Queensland, Australia.
Abstract
In studies using isolated ovarian granulosa and thecal cells it is important to assess the degree of cross contamination. Marker genes commonly used for granulosa cells include FSHR, CYP19A1 and AMH while CYP17A1 and INSL3 are used for thecal cells. To increase the number of marker genes available we compared expression microarray data from isolated theca interna with that from granulosa cells of bovine small (n = 10 for both theca and granulosa cells; 3-5 mm) and large (n = 4 for both theca and granulosa cells, > 9 mm) antral follicles. Validation was conducted by qRT-PCR analyses. Known markers such as CYP19A1, FSHR and NR5A2 and another 11 genes (LOC404103, MGARP, GLDC, CHST8, CSN2, GPX3, SLC35G1, CA8, CLGN, FAM78A, SLC16A3) were common to the lists of the 50 most up regulated genes in granulosa cells from both follicle sizes. The expression in theca interna was more consistent than in granulosa cells between the two follicle sizes. Many genes up regulated in theca interna were common to both sizes of follicles (MGP, DCN, ASPN, ALDH1A1, COL1A2, FN1, COL3A1, OGN, APOD, COL5A2, IGF2, NID1, LHFP, ACTA2, DUSP12, ACTG2, SPARCL1, FILIP1L, EGFLAM, ADAMDEC1, HPGD, COL12A1, FBLN5, RAMP2, COL15A1, PLK2, COL6A3, LOXL1, RARRES1, FLI1, LAMA2). Many of these were stromal extracellular matrix genes. MGARP, GLDC, CHST8, GPX3 were identified as new potential markers for granulosa cells, while FBLN5, OGN, RAMP2 were significantly elevated in the theca interna.
In studies using isolated ovarian granulosa and thecal cells it is important to assess the degree of cross contamination. Marker genes commonly used for granulosa cells include FSHR, CYP19A1 and AMH while CYP17A1 and INSL3 are used for thecal cells. To increase the number of marker genes available we compared expression microarray data from isolated theca interna with that from granulosa cells of bovine small (n = 10 for both theca and granulosa cells; 3-5 mm) and large (n = 4 for both theca and granulosa cells, > 9 mm) antral follicles. Validation was conducted by qRT-PCR analyses. Known markers such as CYP19A1, FSHR and NR5A2 and another 11 genes (LOC404103, MGARP, GLDC, CHST8, CSN2, GPX3, SLC35G1, CA8, CLGN, FAM78A, SLC16A3) were common to the lists of the 50 most up regulated genes in granulosa cells from both follicle sizes. The expression in theca interna was more consistent than in granulosa cells between the two follicle sizes. Many genes up regulated in theca interna were common to both sizes of follicles (MGP, DCN, ASPN, ALDH1A1, COL1A2, FN1, COL3A1, OGN, APOD, COL5A2, IGF2, NID1, LHFP, ACTA2, DUSP12, ACTG2, SPARCL1, FILIP1L, EGFLAM, ADAMDEC1, HPGD, COL12A1, FBLN5, RAMP2, COL15A1, PLK2, COL6A3, LOXL1, RARRES1, FLI1, LAMA2). Many of these were stromal extracellular matrix genes. MGARP, GLDC, CHST8, GPX3 were identified as new potential markers for granulosa cells, while FBLN5, OGN, RAMP2 were significantly elevated in the theca interna.
It is well known that ovarian follicles are formed during fetal development and initially are composed of an oocyte, arrested in meiosis and surrounded by a single layer of granulosa cells all enveloped by the follicular basal lamina [1]. Each day a number of follicles are activated to resume growth and development [2]. The granulosa cells replicate and eventually a fluid-filled antral cavity develops. It is surrounded by multiple layers of epithelial granulosa cells. Specialized stromal layers, the theca interna and externa, develop outside of the follicular basal lamina. The theca interna is composed of capillaries, fibroblasts, immune cells and specialized steroidogenic cells [3]. These steroidogenic cells produce androgens and also insulin-like-3 (INSL3). This commences when the theca interna is first recognizable as a distinct tissue layer and continues up until ovulation of the follicle [4]. The granulosa cells only mature into steroidogenic cells during the last 5% of their follicular development in the weeks leading up to ovulation [5]. At this stage, the granulosa cells develop the capacity to convert the thecal-derived androgens into estrogens. This splitting of the steroidogenic pathway between the thecal cells and the granulosa cells is known as the two cell theory of estradiol production [6].Much of our knowledge of both theca and granulosa cells comes from analysis of isolated cells and their in vitro culture. The isolation typically involves extruding granulosa cells from ruptured follicles in small animal species or physically scraping them from the follicular basal lamina in follicles that have been split open in large animal species. If these processes are conducted carefully very little contamination of the granulosa cells with thecal cells occurs. Also, if not conducted thoroughly then the isolated cells are not representative of the in vivo cells as the antrally-situated cells can have different properties to those located basally in the membrana granulosa [7]. Additionally, the theca interna layer can be isolated by removal of the granulosa cells and dissection of the theca interna away from the externa. Cross contamination of granulosa cells with cells from the theca interna and vice versa is always a concern and is often confirmed retrospectively by quantitation of markers for the theca interna and for granulosa cells (examples include [8-12]).To identify granulosa cell contamination of the theca cell preparations expression of cytochrome P450aromatase or its encoding gene CYP19A1 and FSH receptor (FSHR) are often used. The standard marker of thecal contamination of granulosa cell preparations is cytochrome P450 17α-hydroxylase or its encoding gene CYP17A1. Insulin like 3 (INSL3) is also exclusively expressed in the steroidogenic cells of the theca interna [13] and is an appropriate thecal cell marker. There is definitely a need for identifying additional markers of granulosa cells as aromatase/CYP19A1 is up regulated in large antral follicles [5], reducing its utility when working with much smaller antral follicles. Furthermore in very large follicles approaching ovulation, CYP19A1 expression is reduced like during early atresia [5], which is a disadvantage when working with these follicle types. In follicles aromatase is exclusively expressed in granulosa cells, excluding suiform species [14], but its changing levels of expression during follicle growth and atresia makes it less than ideal as a marker. Thus additional markers of both theca and granulosa cells would be useful to have.The goal of the current study was to examine the transcriptomes of granulosa cells and theca interna derived from both small (3–5 mm) and large (> 9 mm) healthy bovine follicles and to identify additional genes differentially expressed between granulosa cells and theca interna. The transcriptome analyses used the same type of Affymetrix platforms for all samples examined as recently published by us [15-18].
Materials and Methods
Tissues and cells, RNA extraction and array hybridization
Granulosa cells and intact theca interna were previously isolated from four different groups of individual healthy follicles (n = 10 for theca interna and n = 10 for granulosa cells from follicles 3–5 mm, n = 4 from theca interna and n = 4 from granulosa cells from follicles > 9 mm) obtained from an abattoir according to previously described methods [16,17]. The health status of the follicles was confirmed by histological examination of a portion of the follicle wall. It was based on the number of apoptotic figures observed in the membrana granulosa [19,20]. RNA was extracted from granulosa cells and theca interna of each follicle preparation and 2 μg of RNA per sample was processed for hybridization to Bovine Affymetrix Genome Array (Australian Genomics Research Facility, Parkville, Australia and ACRF Cancer Genomics facility, Adelaide, Australia) [16,17]. The CEL files can be obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under series records GSE39589 and GSE49505 for granulosa and theca interna data, respectively.
Array analyses
Affymetrix CEL file data were pre-processed in Partek Genomics Suite (version beta 6.6, St Louis, Missouri, USA) using RMA [21] background summarization, with quantile normalization and log base 2 transformation and mean probe set summarization with adjustment for GC content. Spike-in hybridization intensities on all arrays were within acceptable quality control limits.
Statistical analyses
One-way ANOVA using method of moments estimation was conducted to determine the differentially-expressed probe sets between group comparisons. Post-hoc testing for multiple corrections was performed using the step-up Benjamini-Hochberg False Discovery Rate (FDR) method. P values less than 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. Probe sets which were 4-fold different between granulosa cells and theca interna in small and large antral follicles were selected as differentially regulated. Intensity values for a unique probe set were assigned to each gene on the basis of maximum average intensity across all the arrays. Only genes annotated under Release 34 of the Affymetrix annotations of the Bovine Genome Array (Release Date, 10/24/13) were included in the lists of differentially-regulated genes.
Measurement of gene expression by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR)
Total RNA (200 ng) from granulosa cells and theca interna of small (n = 10 each) and large (n = 5 and 4, respectively, and all from different animals) healthy follicles was extracted and used to synthesize cDNA as detailed previously [18]. All samples for qRT-PCR were identical to the samples used for the microarray apart from small follicle granulosa cells where limited amounts of RNA were obtained and additional small healthy follicles (n = 10) were obtained to isolate more RNA. In addition, an extra sample was included in the large follicle granulosa cell group for the PCR analyses (thus n = 5). Real time RT-PCR assays were designed against 11 genes using web based software and quantitative RT-PCR values were determined from the geometric mean of 2-ΔΔCt of the target genes to the cyclophilin A (PPIA) and glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) as performed previously [18]. The sequence information of the primers is shown in Table 1 and the genes were chosen to represent some genes known to be differentially expressed and other genes with diverse cell functions.
receptor (G protein-coupled) activity modifying protein
RAMP2
NM_001098860
CCAAGTCAGAAGGGAAAACG
TAATCAGGGCCCAATCACAC
118
cytochrome P450, family 17, subfamily A, polypeptide 1
CYP17A1
NM_174304
ACCATCAGAGAAGTGCTCCGAA
CCACAACGTCTGTGCCTTTGT
115
Results
General comparisons
Volcano plots (log fold change in normalized signal intensity versus statistical significance P value) of small versus large follicles for granulosa cells and theca interna are shown in Fig. 1A and B, respectively. Many genes were differentially expressed in granulosa cells between small and large follicles, whilst only relatively few were changed by follicle size in the theca interna (Fig. 1). Volcano plots of granulosa cells versus theca interna from small and large antral follicles are shown in Fig. 2A and B, respectively. Many genes were differentially expressed between granulosa cells and theca interna at both follicle sizes (Fig. 2).
Fig 1
Volcano plots of gene expression in small versus large antral follicles for (A) granulosa cells and (B) theca interna.
The X-axis represents the fold-change between small and large follicles and the Y-axis represents the FDR P value for statistical significance for differences in gene expression across the arrays.
Fig 2
Volcano plots of gene expression in granulosa cells versus theca interna from (A) small and (B) large antral follicles.
The X-axis represents the fold-change between small and large follicles and the Y-axis represents the FDR P value for statistical significance for differences in gene expression across the arrays.
Volcano plots of gene expression in small versus large antral follicles for (A) granulosa cells and (B) theca interna.
The X-axis represents the fold-change between small and large follicles and the Y-axis represents the FDR P value for statistical significance for differences in gene expression across the arrays.
Volcano plots of gene expression in granulosa cells versus theca interna from (A) small and (B) large antral follicles.
The X-axis represents the fold-change between small and large follicles and the Y-axis represents the FDR P value for statistical significance for differences in gene expression across the arrays.
Differentially expressed genes
Comparisons of array data between theca interna and granulosa cells from small and large healthy follicles were conducted and the fifty most differentially-expressed genes are listed in Tables 2 to 5. The complete list and full gene names and mean intensities on arrays are presented in S1 and S2 Tables. A number of genes were differentially expressed in granulosa cells at both sizes of follicles (Tables 2 and 3; S1 and S2 Tables) and included known genes such as CYP19A1, FSHR and NR5A2. Another 11 genes were common to both lists for the small and large follicles (LOC404103, MGARP, GLDC, CHST8, CSN2, GPX3, SLC35G1, CA8, CLGN, FAM78A, SLC16A3; Tables 2 and 3). As previously reported [16] theca interna is more uniform from small to large follicles. We found 30 genes (MGP, DCN, ASPN, ALDH1A1, COL1A2, FN1, COL3A1, OGN, APOD, COL5A2, IGF2, NID1, LHFP, ACTA2, DUSP12, ACTG2, SPARCL1, FILIP1L, EGFLAM, ADAMDEC1, HPGD, COL12A1, FBLN5, RAMP2, COL15A1, PLK2, COL6A3, LOXL1, RARRES1, FLI1, LAMA2) out of 50 that were common to both sizes of follicles (Tables 4 and 5). Genes up regulated in theca included the stromal matrix genes such as DCN, COL1A2 and COL3A1.
Table 2
Top 50 genes differentially up regulated in granulosa cells from small follicles.
Gene Symbol
Fold-change
Gene Symbol
Fold-change
Gene Symbol
Fold-change
PTI
55.7
PPARG
13.8
CCDC3
8.9
*LOC404103
47.1
STRA6
13.1
HAUS4
8.6
*NR5A2
41.0
GUCA1A
12.9
TLL2
8.3
IHH
33.7
*SLC35G1
12.2
ALG3
8.2
UPK1B
31.0
LAMC2
11.6
EFHD1
8.2
*CYP19A1
26.5
TRIM6
10.5
*FAM78A
8.2
JAKMIP1
23.9
CHRDL1
10.4
LOC614107
8.1
*MGARP
22.7
MZB1
10.4
TCRA
8.1
*FSHR
19.4
*CA8
10.1
CRABP2
7.8
CDH2
19.0
*CLGN
9.9
LOC510844
7.7
*GLDC
17.4
CARTPT
9.9
*SLC16A3
7.7
*CHST8
17.0
PRR15
9.8
SLC10A2
7.5
GYLTL1B
16.4
NUP210
9.7
UGT2B11
7.5
*CSN2
16.4
LOC509420
9.7
AP3B2
7.5
*GPX3
16.0
EPDR1
9.2
SVOPL
7.4
NOS2
15.8
FGFR2
9.2
STAC3
7.4
CA14
15.2
AOAH
8.9
The fold change is the ratio of signal intensity of granulosa cell to theca interna from microarray analyses.
*Genes in bold are common to Table 3.
Table 5
Top 50 genes differentially up regulated in theca interna from large follicles.
Gene Symbol
Fold-change
Gene Symbol
Fold-change
Gene Symbol
Fold-change
*COL15A1
166.6
*ASPN
69.4
*FN1
42.7
*ALDH1A1
136.3
*COL6A3
66.6
*RAMP2
41.9
*MGP
121.3
*HPGD
65.2
GNG11
41.5
*NID1
108.5
*IGF2
63.6
*LAMA2
41.1
*COL5A2
104.6
COL1A1
63.5
*FLI1
40.9
*ACTA2 / ACTG2
102.9
LOC781493
60.0
CLDN11
40.3
*RARRES1
99.8
*ADAMDEC1
58.7
SCARA5
39.8
*SPARCL1
92.8
SDPR
57.8
FAM101B
38.3
*COL12A1
90.1
CXCL14
57.8
TAGLN
37.2
*FBLN5
88.8
*LHFP
56.0
ITGBL1
36.8
*COL3A1
86.7
CAV1
50.5
RGS5
35.4
*APOD
84.7
*FILIP1L
49.8
ENPP2
35.0
*OGN
78.0
*XDH
49.0
ACTN1
35.0
*DUSP12
77.4
*DCN
47.2
FBN1
34.8
SHISA2
75.5
CD99
46.8
*LOXL1
34.7
*EGFLAM
73.4
MMP2
45.3
A2M
34.6
*COL1A2
69.5
*PLK2
44.7
The fold change is the ratio of signal intensity of theca interna to granulosa cells from microarray analyses.
*Genes in bold are common to Table 4.
Table 3
Top 50 genes differentially up regulated in granulosa cells from large follicles.
Gene Symbol
Fold-change
Gene Symbol
Fold-change
Gene Symbol
Fold-change
TNFAIP6
319.3
SPOCK2
16.6
GPT
11.2
*CYP19A1
147.0
*SLC35G1
15.7
TNPO1
11.1
LRP8
107.3
VCAN
15.3
NPR3
10.9
*MGARP
42.3
TOX
14.9
PRR15
10.9
*NR5A2
40.1
AP2B1
14.4
*SLC16A3
10.6
SLC27A3
39.1
INHBA
13.9
BTBD7
10.5
EFNA5
37.0
RRAGD
13.3
*LOC404103
10.4
*CHST8
30.0
BEX2
13.2
*FAM78A
10.4
*CA8
27.6
*GLDC
13.0
NT5E
10.4
*CLGN
27.1
NABP1
12.9
SLCO3A1
10
APOA2
26.7
TFR2
12.5
PIK3R1
9.9
*GPX3
23.8
IL6R
12.5
MTR
9.9
LINGO2
23.0
SLC39A8
12.2
ADAM9
9.8
LRRC2
20.1
IGSF11
12.2
TMEM120A
9.7
SUSD4
20.1
*CSN2
11.9
LINGO2
9.6
*FSHR
19.9
RGN
11.5
FST
9.5
CITED1
17.6
TLL2
11.4
The fold change is the ratio of signal intensity of granulosa cell to theca interna from microarray analyses.
*Genes in bold are common to Table 2.
Table 4
Top 50 genes differentially up regulated in theca interna from small follicles.
Gene Symbol
Fold-change
Gene Symbol
Fold-change
Gene Symbol
Fold-change
*MGP
176.6
*SPARCL1
52.8
*COL15A1
35.7
*DCN
102.9
ID1
52.6
*PLK2
35.2
*ASPN
96.9
*FILIP1L
49.3
*COL6A3
33.5
*ALDH1A1
91.6
*EGFLAM
45.4
CDKN1C
33.4
*COL1A2
88.5
*ADAMDEC1
44.7
TBX3
33.0
*FN1
87.3
*HPGD
43.7
PDGFRA
32.9
*COL3A1
84.9
SDC2
43.4
XDH
32.8
*OGN
75.4
*COL12A1
42.5
*LOXL1
32.1
*APOD
74.3
STAR
40.7
*RARRES1
32.0
*COL5A2
73.5
PLXND1
40.5
*FLI1
31.9
NID2
73.4
CLEC3B
39.9
DKK3
31.7
*IGF2
68.3
*FBLN5
39.5
LMO7
31.6
CXCL14
65.9
DLC1
38.6
A2M
31.3
*NID1
56.7
TGFBR2
37.1
SCG2
31.3
*LHFP
55.5
*RAMP2
36.5
*LAMA2
31.0
*ACTA2/ACTG2
55.0
IGFBP6
36.2
LAMB1
28.2
*DUSP12
53.9
C27H8orf4
36.0
The fold change is the ratio of signal intensity of theca interna to granulosa cells from microarray analyses.
*Genes in bold are common to Table 5.
The fold change is the ratio of signal intensity of granulosa cell to theca interna from microarray analyses.*Genes in bold are common to Table 3.The fold change is the ratio of signal intensity of granulosa cell to theca interna from microarray analyses.*Genes in bold are common to Table 2.The fold change is the ratio of signal intensity of theca interna to granulosa cells from microarray analyses.*Genes in bold are common to Table 5.The fold change is the ratio of signal intensity of theca interna to granulosa cells from microarray analyses.*Genes in bold are common to Table 4.
Verification of differentially expressed genes by qRT-PCR
A number of genes that were differentially up regulated in the granulosa cells (MGARP, GLDC, CHST8, GPX3 and FSHR) or in the theca interna (FBLN5, OGN, RAMP2 and CYP17A1) for both follicles sizes were selected and their mRNA levels examined in granulosa cells (Fig. 3) and theca interna (Fig. 4) isolated from small and large follicles. In this group of genes two were chosen as well known makers of granulosa cells (FSHR) and thecal cells (CYP17). The mRNA levels, relative to housekeeping genes GAPDH and PPIA and the array signal intensities are shown in Figs. 3 and 4. These results show that the microarray and the qRT-PCR data agree remarkably well in relative terms for all the genes examined, thus confirming that microarray analyses have indeed identified genes which are differentially expressed between granulosa cells and theca interna.
Fig 3
Expression data for up regulated genes in granulosa cells from small and large follicles.
The data are shown as the mean ± SEM (n = 10 for small follicle group, n = 4 for large follicle group, GC = granulosa cells, TI = theca interna). qRT-PCR values were determined from the geometric mean of 2-ΔΔCt of the target genes to the cyclophilin A (PPIA) and glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), and the microarray values are signal intensities (normalized but not log transformed). Significantly different results for qRT-PCR were determined by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. The P values for the microarray results were corrected for multiple testing using the FDR. All values which were statistically different from each other are indicated by the different alphabetical symbols in the graphs.
Fig 4
Expression data for up regulated genes in thecal layers from small and large follicles.
The data are shown as the mean ± SEM (n = 10 for small follicle group, n = 5 for large follicle group, GC = granulosa cells, TI = theca interna). qRT-PCR values were determined from the geometric mean of 2-ΔΔCt of the target genes to the cyclophilin A (PPIA) and glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), and the microarray values are signal intensities (normalized but not log transformed). Significantly different results for qRT-PCR were determined by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. The P values for the microarray results were corrected for multiple testing using the FDR. All values which are statistically different from each other are indicated by different alphabetical symbols in the graphs.
Expression data for up regulated genes in granulosa cells from small and large follicles.
The data are shown as the mean ± SEM (n = 10 for small follicle group, n = 4 for large follicle group, GC = granulosa cells, TI = theca interna). qRT-PCR values were determined from the geometric mean of 2-ΔΔCt of the target genes to the cyclophilin A (PPIA) and glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), and the microarray values are signal intensities (normalized but not log transformed). Significantly different results for qRT-PCR were determined by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. The P values for the microarray results were corrected for multiple testing using the FDR. All values which were statistically different from each other are indicated by the different alphabetical symbols in the graphs.
Expression data for up regulated genes in thecal layers from small and large follicles.
The data are shown as the mean ± SEM (n = 10 for small follicle group, n = 5 for large follicle group, GC = granulosa cells, TI = theca interna). qRT-PCR values were determined from the geometric mean of 2-ΔΔCt of the target genes to the cyclophilin A (PPIA) and glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), and the microarray values are signal intensities (normalized but not log transformed). Significantly different results for qRT-PCR were determined by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. The P values for the microarray results were corrected for multiple testing using the FDR. All values which are statistically different from each other are indicated by different alphabetical symbols in the graphs.
Discussion
Isolation of granulosa and thecal cells by dissection has been used extensively to identify their separate roles in folliculogenesis and to examine the regulation of their growth and development. The degree to which cross contamination can confound the data varies from experiment to experiment and not all authors assess contamination, or need to, particularly if examining genes or molecules which have been well characterized in follicles. However, purity can matter substantially and many authors have assessed the purity of the cell preparations (examples include [8-12]). However, additional markers of these cell types at different stages of follicle growth would be useful to advance research on these cells. To identify such genes we compared granulosa cells and theca interna of two sizes of bovine follicles. These were derived from bovine follicles validated by histology as healthy [15,18]. The purity of the cell types had previously been confirmed [15,18]. RNA microarrays were conducted under similar conditions for the different cell and follicle types and the results from these arrays were validated previously [16,17].Volcano plots identified that granulosa cells from small and large follicles differed substantially in their transcriptomes, unlike theca interna which was uniform. This initially seems counter intuitive as the mural granulosa cells being an epithelial layer are cellularly homogeneous, whereas the theca interna is a stromal layer with many different cell types. However, the significant changes in the granulosa cells with follicle size, probably reflects their important changing roles in follicular growth at the stages examined. Comparing the transcriptomes of theca interna and granulosa cells at each size, identified that their transcriptomes were very different in both the small and large follicles, with thousands of genes differentially expressed between the two cell types (P < 0.05, > 2 fold).We focused on the 50 most differentially-expressed genes (full list is in the S1 and S2 Tables) between granulosa cells and theca interna within each follicle size group and identified genes common to both sizes of follicles. The genes up regulated in granulosa cells were all more than 7 fold up regulated and those up regulated in the theca interna were all greater than 28 fold up regulated. Of the short lists of up regulated genes for the two follicle sizes only 14 were common to both sizes of follicles for granulosa cells and included genes (CYP19A1, FSHR and NR5A2) known to be differentially up regulated in granulosa cells. The theca interna, which had much more uniform transcriptomes between the two sizes, had 30 genes in common to both short lists. Many of the genes up regulated in the theca interna were collagens and associated genes (COL1A2, COL3A1, COL5A2, COL6A3, COL12A1, COL15A1, DCN), other extracellular matrix genes (LAMA2, NID1, FBLN5, FN1, MGP, ASPN, OGN, EGFLAM) or encoding enzymes that process extracellular matrix (ADAMDEC1, LOXL1). Whilst these are good candidates for indicating the presence of cells derived from the theca interna in a preparation of granulosa cells some of these genes are also likely to be expressed in the ovarian stroma as the theca interna is a stromal layer [22]. Therefore some of these genes are not likely to be thecal-specific markers but certainly can be used to identify thecal contamination of preparations of granulosa cells.A number of genes were selected for validation by quantitative RT-PCR for differential expression between granulosa cells and theca interna in both small and large follicles. These genes displayed relatively high array intensity in a particular cell type and are not well characterized in terms of ovarian function. MGARP, GLDC, CHST8, GPX3 and the known differentially-expressed gene in granulosa cells, FSHR, were substantially greater in granulosa cells than theca interna as determined by both RT-PCR and microarray analyses and for both sizes of follicles. MGARP, or ovary specific acidic protein (OSAP) [23], and CHST8, a sulfotransferase, were up regulated in large follicles in the current study and have been shown previously [24]. GLDC, which encodes glycine decarboxylase, was increased in small follicles which correspond to a less differentiated phenotype, more similar to pluripotent cells [25]. The extracellular matrix protein genes, FBLN5 and OGN, and RAMP2, the adrenomedullin co-receptor, and the known differentially-expressed gene in theca interna, CYP17A1, were substantially greater in theca interna than in granulosa cells as determined by both qRT-PCR and microarray analyses and for both sizes of follicles. Thus these results confirm that the microarray analyses were correctly identifying genes differentially expressed in granulosa cells and in theca interna.Thus in summary, we have identified a substantial number of genes which are differentially expressed between granulosa cells and the theca interna. This information will aid future studies of these cells, identifying the degree of cross contamination and providing a list of genes of interest for further study.
List of genes > 4-fold differentially-expressed in granulosa cells compared with theca interna in small follicles with FDR P < 0.05.
Gene name, ID, fold change and mean array intensities are presented.(PDF)Click here for additional data file.
List of genes 4-fold differentially-expressed in granulosa cells compared with theca interna in large follicles with FDR P < 0.05.
Gene name, ID, fold change and mean array intensities are presented.(PDF)Click here for additional data file.
Authors: Tracy Nguyen; Samuel Lee; Nicholas Hatzirodos; Katja Hummitzsch; Thomas R Sullivan; Raymond J Rodgers; Helen F Irving-Rodgers Journal: Mol Cell Endocrinol Date: 2012-08-02 Impact factor: 4.102
Authors: Nicholas Hatzirodos; Katja Hummitzsch; Helen F Irving-Rodgers; Margaret L Harland; Stephanie E Morris; Raymond J Rodgers Journal: BMC Genomics Date: 2014-01-18 Impact factor: 3.969
Authors: Nicholas Hatzirodos; Helen F Irving-Rodgers; Katja Hummitzsch; Margaret L Harland; Stephanie E Morris; Raymond J Rodgers Journal: BMC Genomics Date: 2014-01-14 Impact factor: 3.969
Authors: Yi-Lin Yan; Peter Batzel; Tom Titus; Jason Sydes; Thomas Desvignes; Ruth BreMiller; Bruce Draper; John H Postlethwait Journal: Genetics Date: 2019-08-09 Impact factor: 4.562
Authors: Sarah M Romereim; Adam F Summers; William E Pohlmeier; Pan Zhang; Xiaoying Hou; Heather A Talbott; Robert A Cushman; Jennifer R Wood; John S Davis; Andrea S Cupp Journal: Mol Cell Endocrinol Date: 2016-09-28 Impact factor: 4.102
Authors: Katharine E Shelly; Nicholes R Candelaria; Ziyi Li; Emily G Allen; Peng Jin; David L Nelson Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2021-05-29 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Sarah M Romereim; Adam F Summers; William E Pohlmeier; Pan Zhang; Xiaoying Hou; Heather A Talbott; Robert A Cushman; Jennifer R Wood; John S Davis; Andrea S Cupp Journal: Data Brief Date: 2016-12-10
Authors: Alexis Arcos; Matilde de Paola; Diego Gianetti; Diego Acuña; Zahady D Velásquez; María Paz Miró; Gabriela Toro; Bryan Hinrichsen; Rosa Iris Muñoz; Yimo Lin; Gonzalo A Mardones; Pamela Ehrenfeld; Francisco J Rivera; Marcela A Michaut; Luis Federico Batiz Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-09-18 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Alexandria P Snider; Sarah M Romereim; Renee M McFee; Adam F Summers; William E Pohlmeier; Scott G Kurz; John S Davis; Jennifer R Wood; Andrea S Cupp Journal: Data Brief Date: 2021-06-11