Barbara Riegel1, Victoria Vaughan Dickson, Kenneth M Faulkner. 1. Barbara Riegel, DNSc, RN, FAHA, FAAN Edith Clemmer Steinbright Professor of Gerontology, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Victoria Vaughan Dickson, PhD, RN, FAHA, FAAN Assistant Professor, College of Nursing, New York University.Kenneth M. Faulkner, MS, RN, ANP-BC PhD student, College of Nursing, New York University, and Clinical Assistant Professor, School of Nursing, Stony Brook University, New York.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Since the situation-specific theory of heart failure (HF) self-care was published in 2008, we have learned much about how and why patients with HF take care of themselves. This knowledge was used to revise and update the theory. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article was to describe the revised, updated situation-specific theory of HF self-care. RESULT: Three major revisions were made to the existing theory: (1) a new theoretical concept reflecting the process of symptom perception was added; (2) each self-care process now involves both autonomous and consultative elements; and (3) a closer link between the self-care processes and the naturalistic decision-making process is described. In the revised theory, HF self-care is defined as a naturalistic decision-making process with person, problem, and environmental factors that influence the everyday decisions made by patients and the self-care actions taken. The first self-care process, maintenance, captures those behaviors typically referred to as treatment adherence. The second self-care process, symptom perception, involves body listening, monitoring signs, as well as recognition, interpretation, and labeling of symptoms. The third self-care process, management, is the response to symptoms when they occur. A total of 5 assumptions and 8 testable propositions are specified in this revised theory. CONCLUSION: Prior research illustrates that all 3 self-care processes (ie, maintenance, symptom perception, and management) are integral to self-care. Further research is greatly needed to identify how best to help patients become experts in HF self-care.
BACKGROUND: Since the situation-specific theory of heart failure (HF) self-care was published in 2008, we have learned much about how and why patients with HF take care of themselves. This knowledge was used to revise and update the theory. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article was to describe the revised, updated situation-specific theory of HF self-care. RESULT: Three major revisions were made to the existing theory: (1) a new theoretical concept reflecting the process of symptom perception was added; (2) each self-care process now involves both autonomous and consultative elements; and (3) a closer link between the self-care processes and the naturalistic decision-making process is described. In the revised theory, HF self-care is defined as a naturalistic decision-making process with person, problem, and environmental factors that influence the everyday decisions made by patients and the self-care actions taken. The first self-care process, maintenance, captures those behaviors typically referred to as treatment adherence. The second self-care process, symptom perception, involves body listening, monitoring signs, as well as recognition, interpretation, and labeling of symptoms. The third self-care process, management, is the response to symptoms when they occur. A total of 5 assumptions and 8 testable propositions are specified in this revised theory. CONCLUSION: Prior research illustrates that all 3 self-care processes (ie, maintenance, symptom perception, and management) are integral to self-care. Further research is greatly needed to identify how best to help patients become experts in HF self-care.
Authors: Julie T Bidwell; Ercole Vellone; Karen S Lyons; Fabio D'Agostino; Barbara Riegel; Raúl Juárez-Vela; Shirin O Hiatt; Rosaria Alvaro; Christopher S Lee Journal: Res Nurs Health Date: 2015-08-20 Impact factor: 2.228
Authors: Barbara Riegel; Victoria Vaughan Dickson; Christopher S Lee; Marguerite Daus; Julia Hill; Elliane Irani; Solim Lee; Joyce W Wald; Stephen T Moelter; Lisa Rathman; Megan Streur; Foster Osei Baah; Linda Ruppert; Daniel R Schwartz; Alfred Bove Journal: Heart Lung Date: 2018-01-03 Impact factor: 2.210
Authors: Pamela N Peterson; Larry A Allen; Paul A Heidenreich; Nancy M Albert; Ileana L Piña Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Shirley M Moore; Rachel Schiffman; Drenna Waldrop-Valverde; Nancy S Redeker; Donna Jo McCloskey; Miyong T Kim; Margaret M Heitkemper; Barbara J Guthrie; Susan G Dorsey; Sharron L Docherty; Debra Barton; Donald E Bailey; Joan K Austin; Patricia Grady Journal: J Nurs Scholarsh Date: 2016-08-03 Impact factor: 3.176
Authors: Harleah G Buck; Anna Stromberg; Misook L Chung; Kristine A Donovan; Karen Harkness; Allison M Howard; Naoko Kato; Randall Polo; Lorraine S Evangelista Journal: Int J Nurs Stud Date: 2017-10-19 Impact factor: 5.837
Authors: Elliane Irani; Scott Emory Moore; Ronald L Hickman; Mary A Dolansky; Richard A Josephson; Joel W Hughes Journal: J Cardiovasc Nurs Date: 2019 Jul/Aug Impact factor: 2.083