Yan Liu1, Jitender Sareen, James Bolton, JianLi Wang. 1. Faculty of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To develop and validate a risk prediction algorithm for the recurrence of panic disorder. METHODS: Three-year longitudinal data were taken from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (2001/2002-2004/2005). One thousand six hundred and eighty one participants with a lifetime panic disorder and who had not had panic attacks for at least 2 months at baseline were included. The development cohort included 949 participants; 732 from different census regions were in the validation cohort. Recurrence of panic disorder over the follow-up period was assessed using the Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule, based on the DSM-IV criteria. Logistic regression was used for deriving the algorithm. Discrimination and calibration were assessed in the development and the validation cohorts. RESULTS: The developed algorithm consisted of 11 predictors: age, sex, panic disorder in the past 12 months, nicotine dependence, rapid heartbeat/tachycardia, taking medication for panic attacks, feelings of choking and persistent worry about having another panic attack, two personality traits, and childhood trauma. The algorithm had good discriminative power (C statistic = 0.7863, 95% CI: 0.7487, 0.8240). The C statistic was 0.7283 (95% CI: 0.6889, 0.7764) in the external validation data set. CONCLUSIONS: The developed risk algorithm for predicting the recurrence of panic disorder has good discrimination and excellent calibration. Data related to the predictors can be easily attainable in routine clinical practice. It can be used by clinicians to calculate the probability of recurrence of panic disorder in the next 3 years for individual patients, communicate with patients regarding personal risks, and thus improve personalized treatment approaches.
BACKGROUND: To develop and validate a risk prediction algorithm for the recurrence of panic disorder. METHODS: Three-year longitudinal data were taken from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (2001/2002-2004/2005). One thousand six hundred and eighty one participants with a lifetime panic disorder and who had not had panic attacks for at least 2 months at baseline were included. The development cohort included 949 participants; 732 from different census regions were in the validation cohort. Recurrence of panic disorder over the follow-up period was assessed using the Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule, based on the DSM-IV criteria. Logistic regression was used for deriving the algorithm. Discrimination and calibration were assessed in the development and the validation cohorts. RESULTS: The developed algorithm consisted of 11 predictors: age, sex, panic disorder in the past 12 months, nicotine dependence, rapid heartbeat/tachycardia, taking medication for panic attacks, feelings of choking and persistent worry about having another panic attack, two personality traits, and childhood trauma. The algorithm had good discriminative power (C statistic = 0.7863, 95% CI: 0.7487, 0.8240). The C statistic was 0.7283 (95% CI: 0.6889, 0.7764) in the external validation data set. CONCLUSIONS: The developed risk algorithm for predicting the recurrence of panic disorder has good discrimination and excellent calibration. Data related to the predictors can be easily attainable in routine clinical practice. It can be used by clinicians to calculate the probability of recurrence of panic disorder in the next 3 years for individual patients, communicate with patients regarding personal risks, and thus improve personalized treatment approaches.
Authors: Janika Thielecke; Claudia Buntrock; Ingrid Titzler; Lina Braun; Johanna Freund; Matthias Berking; Harald Baumeister; David D Ebert Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2020-03-04 Impact factor: 4.157
Authors: Gonzalo Salazar de Pablo; Erich Studerus; Julio Vaquerizo-Serrano; Jessica Irving; Ana Catalan; Dominic Oliver; Helen Baldwin; Andrea Danese; Seena Fazel; Ewout W Steyerberg; Daniel Stahl; Paolo Fusar-Poli Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2021-03-16 Impact factor: 9.306