Literature DB >> 25774069

Debiasing the disposition effect by reducing the saliency of information about a stock's purchase price.

Cary Frydman1, Antonio Rangel2.   

Abstract

The disposition effect refers to the empirical fact that investors have a higher propensity to sell risky assets with capital gains compared to risky assets with capital losses, and it has been associated with low trading performance. We use a stock trading laboratory experiment to investigate if it is possible to reduce subjects' tendency to exhibit a disposition effect by making information about a stock's purchase price, and thus about capital gains and losses, less salient. We compare two experimental conditions: a high-saliency condition in which the purchase price of a stock is prominently displayed by the trading software, and a low-saliency condition in which it is not displayed at all. We find that individuals exhibit a disposition effect in the high-saliency condition, and that the effect is 25% smaller in the low-saliency condition. This suggests that it is possible to debias the disposition effect by reducing the saliency with which information about a stock's purchase price is displayed on financial statements and online trading platforms.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attention; behavioral finance; debiasing; decision mistakes; disposition effect; realization utility

Year:  2014        PMID: 25774069      PMCID: PMC4357845          DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2014.01.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Econ Behav Organ        ISSN: 0167-2681


  9 in total

1.  Multialternative decision field theory: a dynamic connectionist model of decision making.

Authors:  R M Roe; J R Busemeyer; J T Townsend
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Visual fixations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice.

Authors:  Ian Krajbich; Carrie Armel; Antonio Rangel
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-12       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Mixed-effects and fMRI studies.

Authors:  K J Friston; K E Stephan; T E Lund; A Morcom; S Kiebel
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-01-01       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Focusing attention on the health aspects of foods changes value signals in vmPFC and improves dietary choice.

Authors:  Todd A Hare; Jonathan Malmaud; Antonio Rangel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Multialternative drift-diffusion model predicts the relationship between visual fixations and choice in value-based decisions.

Authors:  Ian Krajbich; Antonio Rangel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Decision field theory: a dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment.

Authors:  J R Busemeyer; J T Townsend
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Using Neural Data to Test A Theory of Investor Behavior: An Application to Realization Utility.

Authors:  Cary Frydman; Nicholas Barberis; Colin Camerer; Peter Bossaerts; Antonio Rangel
Journal:  J Finance       Date:  2014-04-01

8.  Attention, learning, and the value of information.

Authors:  Jacqueline Gottlieb
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  The attentional drift-diffusion model extends to simple purchasing decisions.

Authors:  Ian Krajbich; Dingchao Lu; Colin Camerer; Antonio Rangel
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-06-13
  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  Small Cues Change Savings Choices.

Authors:  James J Choi; Emily Haisley; Jennifer Kurkoski; Cade Massey
Journal:  J Econ Behav Organ       Date:  2017-08-24

2.  Transferring cognitive talent across domains to reduce the disposition effect in investment.

Authors:  Kristian Rotaru; Petko S Kalev; Nitin Yadav; Peter Bossaerts
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Practical behavioural solutions to COVID-19: Changing the role of behavioural science in crises.

Authors:  Charlotte C Tanis; Floor H Nauta; Meier J Boersma; Maya V Van der Steenhoven; Denny Borsboom; Tessa F Blanken
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-12       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Outcome saliency modulates behavioral decision switching.

Authors:  Sai Sun; Rongjun Yu; Shuo Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.