Literature DB >> 25773948

Reliability of the cervical vertebrae maturation (CVM) method.

A Predko-Engel, M Kaminek, K Langova, P Kowalski, P S Fudalej.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability of the cervical vertebrae maturation method (CVM).
BACKGROUND: Skeletal maturity estimation can influence the manner and time of orthodontic treatment. The CVM method evaluates skeletal growth on the basis of the changes in the morphology of cervical vertebrae C2, C3, C4 during growth. These vertebrae are visible on a lateral cephalogram, so the method does not require an additional radiograph.
METHODS: In this website based study, 10 orthodontists with a long clinical practice (3 routinely using the method - "Routine user - RU" and 7 with less experience in the CVM method - "Non-Routine user - nonRU") rated twice cervical vertebrae maturation with the CVM method on 50 cropped scans of lateral cephalograms of children in circumpubertal age (for boys: 11.5 to 15.5 years; for girls: 10 to 14 years). Kappa statistics (with lower limits of 95% confidence intervals (CI)) and proportion of complete agreement on staging was used to evaluate intra- and inter-assessor agreement.
RESULTS: The mean weighted kappa for intra-assessor agreement was 0.44 (range: 0.30-0.64; range of lower limits of 95% CI: 0.12-0.48) and for inter-assessor agreement was 0.28 (range: -0.01-0.58; range of lower limits of 95% CI: -0.14-0.42). The mean proportion of identical scores assigned by the same assessor was 55.2 %(range: 44-74 %) and for different pairs of assessors was 42 % (range: 16-68 %).
CONCLUSIONS: The reliability of the CVM method is questionable and if orthodontic treatment should be initiated relative to the maximum growth, the use of additional biologic indicators should be considered (Tab. 4, Fig. 1, Ref. 24).

Entities:  

Keywords:  reliability of the method.; skeletal age; cervical vertebrae maturation (CVM)

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25773948     DOI: 10.4149/bll_2015_043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bratisl Lek Listy        ISSN: 0006-9248            Impact factor:   1.278


  6 in total

1.  Mitteilungen der DGKFO.

Authors:  H Fischer-Brandies
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Age estimation in Turkish children and young adolescents using fourth cervical vertebra.

Authors:  Ayse Gulsahi; Sevi Burçak Çehreli; Ivan Galić; Luigi Ferrante; Roberto Cameriere
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Comparison of abnormalities in the sequence of growth stages in the skeletal maturity index vs cervical vertebral maturation.

Authors:  David D Chung; Sepand Ghanouni
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 2.684

4.  Cervical vertebral maturation assessment on lateral cephalometric radiographs using artificial intelligence: comparison of machine learning classifier models.

Authors:  Hakan Amasya; Derya Yildirim; Turgay Aydogan; Nazan Kemaloglu; Kaan Orhan
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Evaluation of the Artificial Neural Network and Naive Bayes Models Trained with Vertebra Ratios for Growth and Development Determination.

Authors:  Hatice Kök; Mehmet Said İzgi; Ayşe Merve Acılar
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2020-12-02

6.  The Correlation between Dental Stages and Skeletal Maturity Stages.

Authors:  Ayah Jourieh; Haris Khan; Samer Mheissen; Muhammad Assali; Mohammad Khursheed Alam
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 3.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.