| Literature DB >> 25773653 |
Michela Buglione1, Paolo Borghetti2, Sara Pedretti2, Luca Triggiani2, Marco Maria Fontanella3, Giannantonio Spena3, Salvatore Grisanti4, Roberto Liserre5, Luigi Pietro Poliani6, Stefano Gipponi7, Luigi Spiazzi8, Stefano Maria Magrini2.
Abstract
The extent of surgery predicts overall survival (OS) in patients treated for glioblastoma (GBM). The therapeutic approach after partial resection (PR) or biopsy alone (BA) is not clearly defined. This retrospective analysis was therefore planned to analyse clinical features, treatment and survival of patients undergoing PR or BA. We analysed the clinical/therapeutic features and the outcome of 232 patients submitted to BA/PR and treated with radiotherapy (RT) with/without chemotherapy. Two subgroups (pre- and post-Temozolomide-era) were identified. The BA/PR ratio did not change with the accrual periods. In the TMZ-era, 50 % of the patients had chemotherapy; "small" volume, hypo-fractionated and "low" dose RT (<54 Gy) were delivered to 93, 38 and 44 % of the patients; corresponding values for the previous period were 4, 28, 11 and 2 % (P < 0.001). Better two-year OS was evident in the TMZ-era (18 vs 7 %); PR and chemotherapy affected OS in patients treated with hypo-fractionated, low doses RT (P = 0.02, 0.04). Limited volume, more often MRI-based, and "short" RT treatments were given mostly to unfavourably selected patients, without compromising the results of the whole group. This strategy, combined with an increased use of chemotherapy, resulted in reduced treatment burden, in an improved 2-year OS rate and prospectively in better quality of life, even in this prognostically worse subset of glioma patients.Entities:
Keywords: Biopsy; Glioblastoma; Partial surgery; Radiotherapy; Temozolomide
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25773653 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-015-0528-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Radiol Med ISSN: 0033-8362 Impact factor: 3.469