Literature DB >> 25773550

Selecting a dynamic simulation modeling method for health care delivery research-part 2: report of the ISPOR Dynamic Simulation Modeling Emerging Good Practices Task Force.

Deborah A Marshall1, Lina Burgos-Liz2, Maarten J IJzerman3, William Crown4, William V Padula5, Peter K Wong6, Kalyan S Pasupathy7, Mitchell K Higashi8, Nathaniel D Osgood9.   

Abstract

In a previous report, the ISPOR Task Force on Dynamic Simulation Modeling Applications in Health Care Delivery Research Emerging Good Practices introduced the fundamentals of dynamic simulation modeling and identified the types of health care delivery problems for which dynamic simulation modeling can be used more effectively than other modeling methods. The hierarchical relationship between the health care delivery system, providers, patients, and other stakeholders exhibits a level of complexity that ought to be captured using dynamic simulation modeling methods. As a tool to help researchers decide whether dynamic simulation modeling is an appropriate method for modeling the effects of an intervention on a health care system, we presented the System, Interactions, Multilevel, Understanding, Loops, Agents, Time, Emergence (SIMULATE) checklist consisting of eight elements. This report builds on the previous work, systematically comparing each of the three most commonly used dynamic simulation modeling methods-system dynamics, discrete-event simulation, and agent-based modeling. We review criteria for selecting the most suitable method depending on 1) the purpose-type of problem and research questions being investigated, 2) the object-scope of the model, and 3) the method to model the object to achieve the purpose. Finally, we provide guidance for emerging good practices for dynamic simulation modeling in the health sector, covering all aspects, from the engagement of decision makers in the model design through model maintenance and upkeep. We conclude by providing some recommendations about the application of these methods to add value to informed decision making, with an emphasis on stakeholder engagement, starting with the problem definition. Finally, we identify areas in which further methodological development will likely occur given the growing "volume, velocity and variety" and availability of "big data" to provide empirical evidence and techniques such as machine learning for parameter estimation in dynamic simulation models. Upon reviewing this report in addition to using the SIMULATE checklist, the readers should be able to identify whether dynamic simulation modeling methods are appropriate to address the problem at hand and to recognize the differences of these methods from those of other, more traditional modeling approaches such as Markov models and decision trees. This report provides an overview of these modeling methods and examples of health care system problems in which such methods have been useful. The primary aim of the report was to aid decisions as to whether these simulation methods are appropriate to address specific health systems problems. The report directs readers to other resources for further education on these individual modeling methods for system interventions in the emerging field of health care delivery science and implementation.
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decision making; dynamic simulation modeling; health care delivery; methods

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25773550     DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.01.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health        ISSN: 1098-3015            Impact factor:   5.725


  30 in total

1.  Transforming Healthcare Delivery: Integrating Dynamic Simulation Modelling and Big Data in Health Economics and Outcomes Research.

Authors:  Deborah A Marshall; Lina Burgos-Liz; Kalyan S Pasupathy; William V Padula; Maarten J IJzerman; Peter K Wong; Mitchell K Higashi; Jordan Engbers; Samuel Wiebe; William Crown; Nathaniel D Osgood
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Simulation Modelling in Healthcare: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Literature Reviews.

Authors:  Syed Salleh; Praveen Thokala; Alan Brennan; Ruby Hughes; Andrew Booth
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Embracing Causal Complexity in Health Disparities: Metabolic Syndemics and Structural Prevention in Rural Minority Communities.

Authors:  Yorghos Apostolopoulos; Michael Kenneth Lemke; Niyousha Hosseinichimeh; Idethia Shevon Harvey; Kristen Hassmiller Lich; Jameisha Brown
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2018-11

Review 4.  Discrete Event Simulation-Based Resource Modelling in Health Technology Assessment.

Authors:  Syed Salleh; Praveen Thokala; Alan Brennan; Ruby Hughes; Simon Dixon
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Addressing Challenges of Economic Evaluation in Precision Medicine Using Dynamic Simulation Modeling.

Authors:  Deborah A Marshall; Luiza R Grazziotin; Dean A Regier; Sarah Wordsworth; James Buchanan; Kathryn Phillips; Maarten Ijzerman
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 5.725

6.  Efficiency Analysis of Integrated Public Hospital Networks in Outpatient Internal Medicine.

Authors:  Miguel Angel Ortíz-Barrios; Juan P Escorcia-Caballero; Fabián Sánchez-Sánchez; Fabio De Felice; Antonella Petrillo
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 4.460

7.  GRADE Guidelines 30: the GRADE approach to assessing the certainty of modeled evidence-An overview in the context of health decision-making.

Authors:  Jan L Brozek; Carlos Canelo-Aybar; Elie A Akl; James M Bowen; John Bucher; Weihsueh A Chiu; Mark Cronin; Benjamin Djulbegovic; Maicon Falavigna; Gordon H Guyatt; Ami A Gordon; Michele Hilton Boon; Raymond C W Hutubessy; Manuela A Joore; Vittal Katikireddi; Judy LaKind; Miranda Langendam; Veena Manja; Kristen Magnuson; Alexander G Mathioudakis; Joerg Meerpohl; Dominik Mertz; Roman Mezencev; Rebecca Morgan; Gian Paolo Morgano; Reem Mustafa; Martin O'Flaherty; Grace Patlewicz; John J Riva; Margarita Posso; Andrew Rooney; Paul M Schlosser; Lisa Schwartz; Ian Shemilt; Jean-Eric Tarride; Kristina A Thayer; Katya Tsaioun; Luke Vale; John Wambaugh; Jessica Wignall; Ashley Williams; Feng Xie; Yuan Zhang; Holger J Schünemann
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 6.437

8.  Targeted COVID-19 Vaccination (TAV-COVID) Considering Limited Vaccination Capacities-An Agent-Based Modeling Evaluation.

Authors:  Beate Jahn; Gaby Sroczynski; Martin Bicher; Claire Rippinger; Nikolai Mühlberger; Júlia Santamaria; Christoph Urach; Michael Schomaker; Igor Stojkov; Daniela Schmid; Günter Weiss; Ursula Wiedermann; Monika Redlberger-Fritz; Christiane Druml; Mirjam Kretzschmar; Maria Paulke-Korinek; Herwig Ostermann; Caroline Czasch; Gottfried Endel; Wolfgang Bock; Nikolas Popper; Uwe Siebert
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-27

9.  An Innovative Approach for Decision-Making on Designing Lifestyle Programs to Reduce Type 2 Diabetes on Dutch Population Level Using Dynamic Simulations.

Authors:  Teun Sluijs; Lotte Lokkers; Serdar Özsezen; Guido A Veldhuis; Heleen M Wortelboer
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-04-29

10.  NETIMIS: Dynamic Simulation of Health Economics Outcomes Using Big Data.

Authors:  Owen A Johnson; Peter S Hall; Claire Hulme
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.