Nicholas D Mian1, Alice S Carter2, Daniel S Pine3, Lauren S Wakschlag4,5, Margaret J Briggs-Gowan6. 1. Center for Anxiety and Related Disorders, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA. 2. Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, USA. 3. National Institute of Mental Health, Division of Intramural Research Programs, Bethesda, MD, USA. 4. Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA. 5. Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA. 6. Department of Psychiatry, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Identifying anxiety disorders in preschool-age children represents an important clinical challenge. Observation is essential to clinical assessment and can help differentiate normative variation from clinically significant anxiety. Yet, most anxiety assessment methods for young children rely on parent-reports. The goal of this article is to present and preliminarily test the reliability and validity of a novel observational paradigm for assessing a range of fearful and anxious behaviors in young children, the Anxiety Dimensional Observation Schedule (Anx-DOS). METHODS: A diverse sample of 403 children, aged 3 to 6 years, and their mothers was studied. Reliability and validity in relation to parent reports (Preschool Age Psychiatric Assessment) and known risk factors, including indicators of behavioral inhibition (latency to touch novel objects) and attention bias to threat (in the dot-probe task) were investigated. RESULTS: The Anx-DOS demonstrated good inter-rater reliability and internal consistency. Evidence for convergent validity was demonstrated relative to mother-reported separation anxiety, social anxiety, phobic avoidance, trauma symptoms, and past service use. Finally, fearfulness was associated with observed latency and attention bias toward threat. CONCLUSIONS: Findings support the Anx-DOS as a method for capturing early manifestations of fearfulness and anxiety in young children. Multimethod assessments incorporating standardized methods for assessing discrete, observable manifestations of anxiety may be beneficial for early identification and clinical intervention efforts.
BACKGROUND: Identifying anxiety disorders in preschool-age children represents an important clinical challenge. Observation is essential to clinical assessment and can help differentiate normative variation from clinically significant anxiety. Yet, most anxiety assessment methods for young children rely on parent-reports. The goal of this article is to present and preliminarily test the reliability and validity of a novel observational paradigm for assessing a range of fearful and anxious behaviors in young children, the Anxiety Dimensional Observation Schedule (Anx-DOS). METHODS: A diverse sample of 403 children, aged 3 to 6 years, and their mothers was studied. Reliability and validity in relation to parent reports (Preschool Age Psychiatric Assessment) and known risk factors, including indicators of behavioral inhibition (latency to touch novel objects) and attention bias to threat (in the dot-probe task) were investigated. RESULTS: The Anx-DOS demonstrated good inter-rater reliability and internal consistency. Evidence for convergent validity was demonstrated relative to mother-reported separation anxiety, social anxiety, phobic avoidance, trauma symptoms, and past service use. Finally, fearfulness was associated with observed latency and attention bias toward threat. CONCLUSIONS: Findings support the Anx-DOS as a method for capturing early manifestations of fearfulness and anxiety in young children. Multimethod assessments incorporating standardized methods for assessing discrete, observable manifestations of anxiety may be beneficial for early identification and clinical intervention efforts.
Authors: Sara R Nichols; Margaret J Briggs-Gowan; Ryne Estabrook; James L Burns; Jacqueline Kestler; Grace Berman; David B Henry; Lauren S Wakschlag Journal: J Abnorm Child Psychol Date: 2015-08
Authors: Margaret J Briggs-Gowan; Alice S Carter; Roseanne Clark; Marilyn Augustyn; Kimberly J McCarthy; Julian D Ford Journal: J Child Psychol Psychiatry Date: 2010-08-19 Impact factor: 8.982
Authors: Koraly Pérez-Edgar; Yair Bar-Haim; Jennifer Martin McDermott; Andrea Chronis-Tuscano; Daniel S Pine; Nathan A Fox Journal: Emotion Date: 2010-06
Authors: Lauren Franz; Adrian Angold; William Copeland; E Jane Costello; Nissa Towe-Goodman; Helen Egger Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2013-09-27 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Lauren S Wakschlag; Margaret J Briggs-Gowan; Seung W Choi; Sara R Nichols; Jacqueline Kestler; James L Burns; Alice S Carter; David Henry Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2013-11-07 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Lea R Dougherty; Marissa R Tolep; Sara J Bufferd; Thomas M Olino; Margaret Dyson; Jennifer Traditi; Suzanne Rose; Gabrielle A Carlson; Daniel N Klein Journal: J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol Date: 2013-01-31
Authors: Kimberly L H Carpenter; Grace T Baranek; William E Copeland; Scott Compton; Nancy Zucker; Geraldine Dawson; Helen L Egger Journal: J Abnorm Child Psychol Date: 2019-06
Authors: Christen M Deveney; Damion Grasso; Amy Hsu; Daniel S Pine; Christopher R Estabrook; Elvira Zobel; James L Burns; Lauren S Wakschlag; Margaret J Briggs-Gowan Journal: Dev Psychobiol Date: 2019-10-20 Impact factor: 3.038
Authors: Catherine A Burrows; Lauren V Usher; Emily M Becker-Haimes; Camilla M McMahon; Peter C Mundy; Amanda Jensen-Doss; Heather A Henderson Journal: J Autism Dev Disord Date: 2018-06
Authors: Jennifer L Bruno; David S Hong; Amy A Lightbody; S M Hadi Hosseini; Joachim Hallmayer; Allan L Reiss Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2020-12-11 Impact factor: 4.791