Literature DB >> 25773506

Patient perspectives on centralisation of low volume, highly specialised procedures in Sweden.

Ida Svederud1, Martin Virhage2, Emma Medin3, Jonas Grundström2, Sarah Friberg2, Joakim Ramsberg4.   

Abstract

This study explores important considerations from a patient perspective in decisions regarding centralisation of specialised health care services. The analysis is performed in the framework of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare's ongoing work to evaluate and, if appropriate, centralise low volume, highly specialised, health services defined as National Specialised Medical Care. In addition to a literature review, a survey directed to members of patient associations and semi-structured interviews with patient association representatives and health care decision makers were conducted. The results showed that from a patient perspective, quality of care in terms of treatment outcomes is the most important factor in decisions regarding centralisation of low volume, highly specialised health care. The study also indicates that additional factors such as continuity of treatment and a well-functioning care pathway are highly important for patients. However, some of these factors may be dependent on the implementation process and predicting how they will evolve in case of centralisation will be difficult. Patient engagement and patient association involvement in the centralisation process is likely to be a key component in attaining patient focused care and ensuring patient satisfaction with the centralisation decisions.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Centralised hospital services; Organisation and administration; Patient preference; Sweden

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25773506     DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.01.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  7 in total

1.  Post-operative Outcomes in Children Undergoing Fontan Palliation in a Regionalized Surgical System.

Authors:  Billie-Jean Martin; David B Ross; Mohammed Al Aklabi; Joyce Harder; John D Dyck; Ivan M Rebeyka
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 1.655

2.  Are PCI Service Volumes Associated with 30-Day Mortality? A Population-Based Study from Taiwan.

Authors:  Tsung-Hsien Yu; Ying-Yi Chou; Chung-Jen Wei; Yu-Chi Tung
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Access to intensive care in 14 European countries: a spatial analysis of intensive care need and capacity in the light of COVID-19.

Authors:  Jan Bauer; Dörthe Brüggmann; Doris Klingelhöfer; Werner Maier; Lars Schwettmann; Daniel J Weiss; David A Groneberg
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  How much centralization of critical care services in the era of telemedicine?

Authors:  Marlies Ostermann; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 9.097

5.  Impact of suspending minimum volume requirements for knee arthroplasty on hospitals in Germany: an uncontrolled before-after study.

Authors:  Werner de Cruppé; Annette Ortwein; Rike Antje Kraska; Max Geraedts
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Volume creates value: The volume-outcome relationship in Scandinavian obesity surgery.

Authors:  Anna Svarts; Thorell Anders; Mats Engwall
Journal:  Health Serv Manage Res       Date:  2022-02-06

7.  Centralizing a national pancreatoduodenectomy service: striking the right balance.

Authors:  L S Nymo; D Kleive; K Waardal; E A Bringeland; J A Søreide; K J Labori; K E Mortensen; K Søreide; K Lassen
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2020-09-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.