OBJECTIVES: The objective was to determine the minimum and ideal clinically significant differences (MCSD, ICSD) in pain intensity in children for the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R) and the Color Analog Scale (CAS) and to identify any differences in these estimates based on patient characteristics. METHODS: This was a prospective study of children aged 4 to 17 years with acute pain presenting to two urban pediatric emergency departments. Participants self-reported their pain intensity using the FPS-R and CAS and qualitatively described their changes in pain. Changes in pain score reported using the FPS-R and CAS that were associated with "a little less" and "much less" pain (MCSD and ICSD, respectively) were identified using a receiver operating characteristic-based method and expressed as raw change score and percent reductions. Estimates of MCSD and ICSD were determined for each category of initial pain intensity (mild, moderate, and severe) and patient characteristics (age, sex, and ethnicity). Post hoc exploratory analyses evaluated categories of race, primary language, and etiology of pain. RESULTS: A total of 314 children with acute pain were enrolled; mean (±SD) age was 9.8 (±3.8) years. The FPS-R raw change score and percent reduction MCSD estimates were 2/10 and 25%, with ICSD estimates of 3/10 and 60%. For the CAS, raw change score and percent reduction MCSD estimates were 1/10 and 15%, with ICSD estimates of 2.75/10 and 52%. For both scales, raw change score and percent reduction estimates of the MCSD remained unchanged in children with either moderate or severe pain. For both scales, estimates of ICSD were not stable across categories of initial pain intensity. There was no difference in MCSD or ICSD based on age, sex, ethnicity, race, primary language, or etiology of pain. CONCLUSIONS: The MCSD estimates can be expressed as raw change score and percent reductions for the FPS-R and CAS. These estimates appear stable for children with moderate to severe pain, irrespective of age, sex, and ethnicity. Estimates of ICSD were not stable across different categories of initial pain intensity, therefore limiting their potential generalizability.
OBJECTIVES: The objective was to determine the minimum and ideal clinically significant differences (MCSD, ICSD) in pain intensity in children for the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R) and the Color Analog Scale (CAS) and to identify any differences in these estimates based on patient characteristics. METHODS: This was a prospective study of children aged 4 to 17 years with acute pain presenting to two urban pediatric emergency departments. Participants self-reported their pain intensity using the FPS-R and CAS and qualitatively described their changes in pain. Changes in pain score reported using the FPS-R and CAS that were associated with "a little less" and "much less" pain (MCSD and ICSD, respectively) were identified using a receiver operating characteristic-based method and expressed as raw change score and percent reductions. Estimates of MCSD and ICSD were determined for each category of initial pain intensity (mild, moderate, and severe) and patient characteristics (age, sex, and ethnicity). Post hoc exploratory analyses evaluated categories of race, primary language, and etiology of pain. RESULTS: A total of 314 children with acute pain were enrolled; mean (±SD) age was 9.8 (±3.8) years. The FPS-R raw change score and percent reduction MCSD estimates were 2/10 and 25%, with ICSD estimates of 3/10 and 60%. For the CAS, raw change score and percent reduction MCSD estimates were 1/10 and 15%, with ICSD estimates of 2.75/10 and 52%. For both scales, raw change score and percent reduction estimates of the MCSD remained unchanged in children with either moderate or severe pain. For both scales, estimates of ICSD were not stable across categories of initial pain intensity. There was no difference in MCSD or ICSD based on age, sex, ethnicity, race, primary language, or etiology of pain. CONCLUSIONS: The MCSD estimates can be expressed as raw change score and percent reductions for the FPS-R and CAS. These estimates appear stable for children with moderate to severe pain, irrespective of age, sex, and ethnicity. Estimates of ICSD were not stable across different categories of initial pain intensity, therefore limiting their potential generalizability.
Authors: Alyssa M Schlenz; Catherine B McClellan; Teresa R M Mark; Alvin D McKelvy; Eve Puffer; Carla W Roberts; Sarah M Sweitzer; Jeffrey C Schatz Journal: J Pain Date: 2012-05-24 Impact factor: 5.820
Authors: Patricia A McGrath; Cheryl E Seifert; Kathy N Speechley; John C Booth; Larry Stitt; Margaret C Gibson Journal: Pain Date: 1996-03 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: H Breivik; P C Borchgrevink; S M Allen; L A Rosseland; L Romundstad; E K Breivik Hals; G Kvarstein; A Stubhaug Journal: Br J Anaesth Date: 2008-05-16 Impact factor: 9.166
Authors: Daniel S Tsze; Gerrit Hirschfeld; Carl L von Baeyer; Leonor E Suarez; Peter S Dayan Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2019-02-19 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Anna Heath; Maryna Yaskina; Gareth Hopkin; Terry P Klassen; Christopher McCabe; Martin Offringa; Petros Pechlivanoglou; Juan David Rios; Naveen Poonai; Samina Ali Journal: Trials Date: 2020-09-03 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: E Anne Lown; Anu Banerjee; Eric Vittinghoff; Christopher C Dvorak; Wendy Hartogensis; Alexis Melton; Christina Mangurian; Hiroe Hu; Deborah Shear; Robyn Adcock; Michael Morgan; Carla Golden; Frederick M Hecht Journal: Glob Adv Health Med Date: 2019-08-14
Authors: Joseph P Cravero; Rita Agarwal; Charles Berde; Patrick Birmingham; Charles J Coté; Jeffrey Galinkin; Lisa Isaac; Sabine Kost-Byerly; David Krodel; Lynne Maxwell; Terri Voepel-Lewis; Navil Sethna; Robert Wilder Journal: Paediatr Anaesth Date: 2019-06-11 Impact factor: 2.556
Authors: Tove Kamsvåg; Anncarin Svanberg; Karin Garming Legert; Johan Arvidson; Louise von Essen; Karin Mellgren; Jacek Toporski; Jacek Winiarski; Gustaf Ljungman Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2020-01-28 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Stacy L Reynolds; Jonathan R Studnek; Kathleen Bryant; Kelly VanderHave; Eric Grossman; Charity G Moore; James Young; Melanie Hogg; Michael S Runyon Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2016-09-08 Impact factor: 2.692