Literature DB >> 25772684

Microbial sealants do not decrease surgical site infection for clean-contaminated colorectal procedures.

M Doorly1, J Choi, A Floyd, A Senagore.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSI) are costly complications that may cause significant morbidity and increase the cost of care, particularly in colorectal surgery. Microbial sealants (MS) are a new class of wound barriers aimed at decreasing SSI; however, there is only evidence of benefit in clean class 1 procedures. Based on its success in class 1 procedures, we hypothesized that a microbial sealant could reduce the rate of SSI by half for clean-contaminated colorectal procedures (class 2).
METHODS: This was a single institution, multihospital, prospective, randomized study approved by the institutional review board. The primary objective was to determine the rate of SSI when microbial sealant (InteguSeal© Kimberly-Clark) is used compared to control (no microbial sealant). Data collected included: open versus laparoscopy, age, body mass index (BMI), diabetes and morbidity [American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class], hospital readmission, reoperation and wound dehiscence. Enrolled subjects received the same preoperative mechanical bowel preparation with oral antibiotics, operative skin preparation (Chloraprep), Surgical Care Improvement Project guidelines implementation), and postoperative care glycemic control for diabetics.
RESULTS: A total of 100 subjects were recruited over 15 months (MS-50; no MS-50). The overall incidence of SSI was 12 %, 14 % (7/50) in the MS versus 10 % (5/50) in the no MS group (p = 0.545). SSI incidence with and without microbial sealant was not significantly different in either the open or the laparoscopic subgroup. Laparoscopy decreased absolute risk of SSI by 16 %. Secondary data (age, BMI, diabetes, ASA) and tertiary data (readmission, reoperation, wound dehiscence) were positively correlated with SSI.
CONCLUSIONS: Microbial sealant as employed in this study did not appear to offer any benefit in a class 2 (clean contaminated) operative procedure when perioperative care is standardized. The relative benefit of laparoscopy was also confirmed but unaffected by use of the microbial sealant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25772684     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-015-1286-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  28 in total

1.  Choice of intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis for colorectal surgery does matter.

Authors:  Rhiannon J Deierhoi; Lillian G Dawes; Catherine Vick; Kamal M F Itani; Mary T Hawn
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Efficacy of integuseal for surgical skin preparation in children and adolescents undergoing scoliosis correction.

Authors:  Eric Dromzee; Quentin Tribot-Laspière; Manon Bachy; Serge Zakine; Pierre Mary; Raphaël Vialle
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Antibiotic choice is independently associated with risk of surgical site infection after colectomy: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Samantha Hendren; Danielle Fritze; Mousumi Banerjee; James Kubus; Robert K Cleary; Michael J Englesbe; Darrell A Campbell
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  A randomized trial of a skin sealant to reduce the risk of incision contamination in cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Abelardo Silva von Eckardstein; Chong H Lim; Pascal M Dohmen; Paulo M Pêgo-Fernandes; William A Cooper; Susan G Oslund; E Lynne Kelley
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Risk factors for surgical site infections after colorectal resection in diabetic patients.

Authors:  Rishabh Sehgal; Arthur Berg; Rafael Figueroa; Lisa S Poritz; Kevin J McKenna; David B Stewart; Walter A Koltun
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  Bowel preparation for colectomy and risk of Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Greta L Krapohl; Laurel R S Phillips; Darrell A Campbell; Samantha Hendren; Mousumi Banerjee; Bonnie Metzger; Arden M Morris
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  A statewide assessment of surgical site infection following colectomy: the role of oral antibiotics.

Authors:  Michael J Englesbe; Linda Brooks; James Kubus; Martin Luchtefeld; James Lynch; Anthony Senagore; John C Eggenberger; Vic Velanovich; Darrell A Campbell
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Surgical infection and the aging population.

Authors:  D P Raymond; S J Pelletier; T D Crabtree; A M Schulman; T L Pruett; R G Sawyer
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 0.688

9.  Wound infection after elective colorectal resection.

Authors:  Robert L Smith; Jamie K Bohl; Shannon T McElearney; Charles M Friel; Margaret M Barclay; Robert G Sawyer; Eugene F Foley
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Reduction in surgical site infection in patients treated with microbial sealant prior to coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a case-control study.

Authors:  P M Dohmen; D Gabbieri; A Weymann; J Linneweber; W Konertz
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 3.926

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Cyanoacrylate microbial sealants for skin preparation prior to surgery.

Authors:  Callum Wood; Cheryl Phillips
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-05-18
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.