A new phenomenon of structural reorganization is discovered and characterized for a gold-carbon system by in-situ atomic-resolution imaging at temperatures up to 1300 K. Here, a graphene sheet serves in three ways, as a quasi transparent substrate for aberration-corrected high-resolution transmission electron microscopy, as an in-situ heater, and as carbon supplier. The sheet has been decorated with gold nanoislands beforehand. During electron irradiation at 80 kV and at elevated temperatures, the accumulation of gold atoms has been observed on defective graphene sites or edges as well as at the facets of gold nanocrystals. Both resulted in clustering, forming unusual crystalline structures. Their lattice parameters and surface termination differ significantly from standard gold nanocrystals. The experimental data, supported by electron energy loss spectroscopy and density-functional theory calculations, suggests that isolated gold and carbon atoms form - under conditions of heat and electron irradiation - a novel type of compound crystal, Au-C in zincblende structure. The novel material is metastable, but surprisingly robust, even under annealing condition.
A new phenomenon of structural reorganization is discovered and characterized for a gold-carbon system by in-situ atomic-resolution imaging at temperatures up to 1300 K. Here, a graphene sheet serves in three ways, as a quasi transparent substrate for aberration-corrected high-resolution transmission electron microscopy, as an in-situ heater, and as carbon supplier. The sheet has been decorated with gold nanoislands beforehand. During electron irradiation at 80 kV and at elevated temperatures, the accumulation of gold atoms has been observed on defective graphene sites or edges as well as at the facets of gold nanocrystals. Both resulted in clustering, forming unusual crystalline structures. Their lattice parameters and surface termination differ significantly from standard gold nanocrystals. The experimental data, supported by electron energy loss spectroscopy and density-functional theory calculations, suggests that isolated gold and carbon atoms form - under conditions of heat and electron irradiation - a novel type of compound crystal, Au-C in zincblende structure. The novel material is metastable, but surprisingly robust, even under annealing condition.
In 1900, Mathews & Watters reported about a very explosive gold acetylide
Au2C21. The substance has been treated
as a ‘true’ carbide and it was indeed the first time that the
existence of gold carbide has been reported ever. Today, more than hundred
years later, the study of various compounds containing gold carbon bonds is
covered by the field of organogold chemistry2. However, in
comparison to many other pure metal carbides, there is no experimental evidence
for a possible inorganic crystalline gold carbon compound and its structural
properties3. This is not surprising, because bulk gold has
almost no solubility for carbon under equilibrium conditions and the only
(above mentioned) gold carbide supposed to be crystalline turned out to be
extremely unstable4. Nowadays, there are several successful
approaches in synthesizing carbide clusters from late transition metals including
gold3. However, theses clusters are electrically charged and
consist of only a very small number of atoms. Furthermore, several concepts
have been developed in synthesizing, characterizing and understanding metastable
carbide crystals regarding transition metals like cobalt, palladium and nickel56 but still with the exception of gold.The structural analysis of new materials has undergone a tremendous improvement
in the capabilities to explore the atomic configuration by aberration-corrected
high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (AC-HRTEM), in particular
due to the successful correction of lens aberrations78. It
is now possible to obtain atomic-resolution images even for light-element
materials such as carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen, with a minimization of atom
knock-on damage by using reduced acceleration voltages910.
The understanding of carbon systems such as graphene or carbon nanotubes has
significantly benefitted from this development. In-situ experiments
enable the study of dynamic phenomena under direct observation of the atomic
structure11 within the range from room temperature (RT) up
to ca. 2000 K12. Therein, the potential of a free-standing
graphene membrane as transparent and heatable substrate has been already demonstrated.
Furthermore, this approach could be applied to investigate the transformation
of carbon adsorbates into graphene with atomic resolution13.In the present work, the approach of in-situ heating via electrical biasing
the graphene has been applied with focus on gold nanoislands and their interaction
with the graphene substrate driven by irradiation. Surprisingly, the bottom-up
formation of a novel, very robust gold-carbon compound has been observed,
as further evidenced by electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) and the help
of density-functional theory (DFT) calculations.
Results and Discussion
Sample preparation
For this work, free-standing graphene layers with electric contacts in
a TEM-compatible geometry have been prepared. This concept has been optimized
for combining Joule heating experimentation via applying an electrical current
to a graphene sheet with real-time atomic-level imaging. The configuration
of the electrically contacted sample cartridge and temperature estimates have
been described in detail previously12.In brief, a mechanically exfoliated graphene sheet is transferred onto
a Si/SiN membrane structure with open windows and gold contacts, such that
an electrically contacted and completely free-standing few-layer graphene
substrate in a TEM-compatible geometry is formed. Gold nanoislands have been
deposited ex-situ via thermal evaporation onto graphene. Their melting temperature
provided an estimate of the local temperature. Here, additionally in-situ
TEM has been performed applying AC-HRTEM combined with local electron energy
loss spectroscopy (EELS) (further details are described in the methodological
section below).
In-situ HRTEM and HRTEM image analysis
Even though, the original interest of this experiment was only the thermally
driven interplay between the gold nano particles and the graphene substrate,
it turned out, that the electron irradiation necessary for TEM imaging influences
the interaction between gold and carbon in a very unexpeted manner. Depending
on the local heating temperature, this aspect is very important for the reactions
that will be described below.The diffusion of gold adatoms on the nanoislands is already significant
at RT1415 and led to continuous shape changes of the particles
upon heating16. After exceeding a certain temperature limit,
the first almost spherically shaped particles form liquid drops and start
to evaporate121317. In accordance with theoretical predictions
and similar experiments, the related melting temperature strongly depends
on the particle size18 and in this work, is estimated to be
in the range of 800 K to 1300 K for particle diameters in the
range of 3 to 20 nm. The observations described in the following occurred
at temperatures closely below the melting point of the gold particles (i.e.
just before the particles melted upon increasing the heating current).The diffusion barrier for gold adatoms on graphene is known to be fairly
low- theoretically estimated to be 0.05 eV19 –
allowing the gold atoms to diffuse very easily along the surface1920.
Considering the average time used for a single frame exposure (0.5 to 1.0 s),
it is impossible to observe the movement of the adatoms directly by TEM. For
this reason, single gold atoms could be only visualized, when they got trapped
at grain boundaries, edge reconstructions or vacancies21. This
confirms recently published DFT calculations concerning in-plane adsorption
on vacancies and the surface diffusion of gold atoms adsorbed on graphene202223. However, in those studies there is no consideration of
electron irradiation-induced diffusion mechanisms as discussed by Urban &
Seeger24 and Banhard25. During a thermally driven
crystallization process of adsorbed amorphous carbon layers13,
plenty of gold atoms have been found, which were trapped and incorporated
into such lattice irregularities or grain boundaries (see Figure
1a).
Figure 1
AC-HRTEM images at 80 keV showing the atomic arrangements of
gold atoms explored from tiny clusters towards small crystallites (scale bars
are 2 nm).
(a) Isolated heavy gold atoms trapped in carbon contamination
on graphene, example indicated by an arrow. A larger gold particle is present
in the upper left corner. Insets (i, ii) show small clusters that form under
irradiation and heat within the carbon contamination layer on top of graphene.
(i) One very rare example found to be consistent with the interatomic distance
of traditional gold clusters. Here, it has been determined to be 2.6 Å.
(ii) One of the frequently observed clusters having a larger spacing of 3.35 Å.
(b) A repeated and abrupt switching of a mono-layer and bi-layer structure
in the same position. (c) A connected single- and double-layer region. The
circles illustrate the atoms of the first and the second layer, respectively.
(d) A few-layer graphene sheet with edges folded into a 90° angle. This
side view enables occasionally also the side view on the Au-X structure (see
marked region where 3 folded Au-X layers are found on top of folded 3-layer
graphene.
In many cases the gold atoms incorporated into the adsorbed amorphous carbon
layers form little clusters with quadratic arrangements (insets of Figure
1a). Typically, the clusters exhibit a surprisingly large nearest-neighbor
atomic distance of 3.35 Å (see Figure 1a (ii)).
Considering their ultra small size and therefore induced deviation of the
lattice parameter, only one example could be identified that coincides with
the bulk value of gold (2.88 Å, see Figure 1a
(i))26. It has been assumed initially that the larger
spacing is due to the incorporation of other low atomic number species into
the 2-D gold lattice. Unfortunately, the prevailing imaging conditions do
not allow the visualization of light elements like carbon in-between the heavy
gold atoms (see discussion based on image simulations below).Several regular monolayers of Au-X with the 3.35 Å spacing
have been observed, but only up to a size of about 30 Au-atoms, whereas larger
Au-X clusters form multi-layer structures (Figure 1b, c).
In some cases, the transitions between single and double layers could be followed
directly in real time (Figure 1b). Figure
1c shows a different example, where only a part of the structure is
a single layer and the other part is a double or triple layer.A side-view of the structure could be obtained for a cluster that had formed
on the curved edge of a (partly broken) few-layer graphene substrate (Figure 1d). Broken edges of freestanding graphene and few-layer
graphene tend to curl up and show the typical van der Waals distance of 3.35 Å
between the layers2728. A distance of 2.35 Å
could be measured between the first and the second layer of the Au-X structure
as marked in Figure 1d. Assuming that the atoms in the
second layer are placed above the gaps of the first layer atoms (as shown
in the plan-view in Figure 1c), the same Au-Au spacing
of 3.35 Å has been obtained as between atoms inside a layer. Figure 2 shows a tiny single-layer example along with several
larger, multi-layer structures. Remarkably, the 3-D objects form precise cuboid
shapes, as evidenced by their constant thickness (same contrast throughout
the rectangle-shaped projection).
Figure 2
AC-HRTEM images at 80 keV of larger compound crystals formed
under ongoing heat treatment and irradiation.
(a) Overview image showing 1–2 nm sized cubes of
the Au-X structure, and one example of an Au-X mono-layer arrangement. The
Fourier transform (inset) provides an accurate estimate of the lattice spacings,
using graphene as calibration standard. (b) A thicker example of the new structure
growing directly at a gold particle, which may serve as a seed and gold feedstock.
A non-linear contrast scale was applied here to show thick and thin structures
in the same image. All scale bars are 2 nm.
Mostly, the cuboids can be found closely to the normal gold nanoparticles
whereas the largest ones have been found even directly attached to one of
those (Figure 2b), showing a preference for the (111)-facets
(see also sequences M1a, M1b and the snapshot in Figure 1
of the supporting information). Growing Au-X structures
do not just collect additional gold atoms, but seemingly ‘eat’
partly crystallized layers of carbon or tiny fullerenes in order to increase
their capacity of gold atoms at the same time (M1b and M2 in the supporting
information). Furthermore, the growth and disappearance of those tiny
objects at the boundaries of holes in the few-layer graphene substrate has
been observed atom by atom (sequence M2 and at end of sequence M3 in the supporting information). Interestingly, this novel kind of
material seems to be relatively stable under the electron beam, but nevertheless
it further reorganizes under its influence (M2). Single larger objects tend
to decompose and form several new smaller particles after increasing the electron
dose rate typically from 5·105 e/nm2s1
to 3·106 e/nm2s1.
Another interesting observation was the continuous crystallization process
into a small cube beginning from a fully amorphous droplet (M3 and in M1 at
the upper left facet).From the top- and side-view images, and the single- to multi-layer transitions,
the structure of the Au part of the lattice can be established unambiguously.
The gold atoms of these 3D nanocrystals exhibit a face-centered cubic (fcc)
lattice structure with a corresponding lattice parameter of √2·(3.35 ±
0.1) Å (a precise estimate was obtained from the Fourier transformation
(FFT) in Figure 2a taking the underlying graphene lattice
as a calibration reference). Bulk gold also has a fcc structure but with a
smaller lattice parameter of √2·2.88 Å.As already mentioned, the large nearest-neighbor atomic distance suggests
the formation of a chemical compound, where another element is embedded into
the voids between the Au atoms. To clarify the amount of visibility of a potentially
present second element, corresponding HRTEM image simulations has been performed
on flat layers exhibiting a fcc lattice based crystal structure, such as illustrated
by Figure 3. Indeed, the result shows that for light
elements such as carbon or even for silicon, it is hard to spot the second
contributing element under the prevailing imaging conditions (see Figure
S9 of the supporting information). As second element,
elements have been considered which are else present in the sample (silicon,
nitrogen, carbon), or reasonably present in the contamination (carbon, oxygen,
silicon and potassium, the latter was used in the sample transfer process)29. First of all, the EELS analysis has been described below in order
to clarify the presence or absence of these elements. Then the results of
DFT calculations have been described in order to find matching lattice spacing
and crystal structures. Three different crystal structures are compatible
to the observed fcc lattice for the incorporation of a second element: These
are the zincblende (ZnS), the rock-salt (NaCl) and the fluorite structure
(CaF2).
Figure 3
Possible crystal structures with an unknown element X in the octahedral
or in the tetrahedral voids of the gold fcc lattice.
Electron energy loss spectroscopy
In order to determine the second element, local EELS was carried out in
the TEM using a small beam diameter (5 nm). Multiple spectra with different
energy ranges were acquired to consider the energy windows of the absorption
edges of the above mentioned elements. Figure 4 shows
the EELS measurements acquired from a single Au-X cuboid on top of graphene
(see Figure S8 in the supporting information).
The presence of the elements carbon (Figure 4a) and
gold (Figure 4b) is indicated by the clear signals of
the carbon K absorption edge at 284 eV and the gold M5 edge
at 2206 eV. The EELS data show that silicon (Figure
4c), nitrogen, and oxygen (Figure 4d) as constituents
can be excluded as the local EELS signals do not show any corresponding absorption
edges. The small signal at around 540 eV originates most probably from
gold (N2,3 edge). Energetically, it would also fit to the oxygen
K edge. However, this signal is too weak (intensity of signal only 0.1% above
background) and therefore it would only correspond to a handful of atoms30. Although the detection of carbon appears to be trivial, because
the Au-X cuboid is directly located on top of the multilayer graphene substrate,
the exclusion of all other reasonable elements justifies the conclusion that
carbon must be the only constituent element in addition to gold.
Figure 4
Local EELS spectra acquired from Au-X on top of graphene.
(a) Original energy loss and extracted carbon K edge at 284 eV
(b) Original energy loss and extracted gold M5 edge at 2206 eV.
(c) EELS spectrum obtained within energy range from 80 to 280 eV showing
no signal of the Si-K edge at 99 eV. (d) EELS spectrum obtained within
energy range from 370 to 570 eV, the signal at around 540 eV
could originate from gold (N2,3 edge) or oxygen (K edge).
Furthermore, it has been found, that these ‘Au-X’ cuboids survived
the exposure to ambient conditions. This has been tested by subsequent annealing
of the entire sample on a hotplate at 200°C in ambient air. Their thermal
stability in the vacuum of the TEM column appears to be at least as high as
that of the gold nanoparticles or even higher: Although the evaporation of
the neighboring gold nanoparticles has been already started, the cuboid structures
start to decompose only upon further heating. When this happens, it occurs
directly, i.e. no liquid phase in-between has been observed (sequence M4 in supporting information). The ‘Au-X’ cuboids have
first been found accidently, i.e. without any purpose, in 3 independent experiments
of heating gold-decorated graphene. In two further experiments the in-situ
growth of the ‘Au-X’ material intentionally via Joule heating
up to 1000 K has been reproduced, followed by continuous electron irradiation.
Density functional theory calculations
In order to confirm the EELS interpretation DFT calculations have been
performed. Table 1 shows the predicted lattice parameters
for each of the three structures (zincblende, rocksalt and fluorite) and four
candidate second elements. Clearly, only the small elements from the second
row of the periodic table (C, N, O) provide a reasonable lattice match, while
e.g. any theoretically considered silicon compound would result in a much
larger lattice parameter than observed in the experiment. This also fits to
the above mentioned EELS spectra showing silicon not to be locally present.
Indeed, the smallest lattice parameter deviation Δ is achieved
for the NaCl structures of AuC, AuN and AuO. However, DFT calculations combined
with the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) tend to yield larger values
compared to those observed in the experiments3132, i.e. the
calculated DFT-GGA value for gold is about 2.4% larger than the experimentally
estimated one. If this difference has been treated as a systematic error,
best agreement is obtained for the ZnS structure of AuC.
Table 1
Calculated lattice parameter a
and the deviation Δ of the lattice parameter with respect to the
observed value for various gold compounds and crystal structures. For the
gold carbide structures, in addition the cohesive energy with respect to bulk
gold and graphite is given
Structure
Compound
a (Å)
Δ (%)
Ecoh (eV/atom)
ZnS
AuC
4.93
4.1
1.88
AuN
4.98
5.1
2.17
AuO
5.11
7.9
2.71
AuSi
5.58
17.8
-
NaCl
AuC
4.67
−1.4
2.09
AuN
5.67
−1.4
2.13
AuO
4.76
0.5
2.58
AuSi
5.25
10.8
-
CaF2
AuC2
5.19
9.5
2.73
AuN2
5.14
8.5
2.74
AuO2
5.18
9.3
3.39
AuSi2
5.90
24.5
-
For all structures, also the cohesive energies have been determined, i.e.
the compound formation energies with respect to the most stable elemental
structure. All calculated cohesive energies are positive. This means that
the considered compounds are not thermodynamically stable. For gold carbide,
the corresponding energies with respect to bulk gold and graphite in Table 1 indicate that it is most stable in the ZnS structure.
The endothermic character of its formation explains why there are so few reports
on gold carbide. As already mentioned, it was identified a long time ago,
and turned out to be explosive under rapid heating and ignites at temperatures
above 180°C1. Its structure has not been determined yet.
Note, however, that here it is assumed that AuC is not formed from graphite
but rather from the hydrocarbon deposits or defects on graphene. Under electron
irradiation, both could be considered as permanent source of atomic carbon.As a further experimental fact, flat crystals and cuboids have been observed
with a size not larger than 20 nm and an explicit (100) surface termination.
For this reason also the surface energies of thin AuC films with ZnS and NaCl
structure have been compared. That calculation is based on a 4 × 4 supercell.
For all calculated surface orientations, no significant surface relaxation
has been found. In case of the ZnS structure, it has been obtained in agreement
with the experiment that the formation of a (100) surface termination should
be clearly favored versus the (110) and (111) surfaces (see Figure
1 in the supporting information). Furthermore, the calculation shows
that surfaces terminated with gold should be energetically preferred. In contrast
to the agreement for ZnS, the (100) surface in the NaCl structure has been
obtained to be the energetically most unfavorable one. The calculated electronic
structure of a small AuC cluster adsorbed on graphene is only slightly modified
compared to the one of the isolated AuC cluster, as shown in the supporting
information. This indicates that AuC is weakly interacting with the
graphene substrate and retains its properties upon adsorption on graphene.
It has been found that AuC is metallic, similar as the stable compound tungstencarbide, WC, whose electronic properties has been determined as a reference.
For the bulk modulus of AuC, which has been derived from the DFT-data, a value
of 141 GPa has been obtained which is smaller than the bulk modulus
of bulk gold, 180 GP33. In contrast, the calculated
bulk modulus of WC of 338 GPa is slightly larger than the one of tungsten
bulk metal, 310 GPa.From the calculation, there is a reasonable agreement of the lattice structure
for the AuC, AuN and AuO compound in NaCl structure, and for an AuC compound
in ZnS structure. The surface termination agrees with the experiment only
for AuC in a ZnS structure. Hence, the conclusion for AuC is supported by
the EELS analysis as well as the DFT calculation. Indeed, there are several
additional points that indicate the presence of an AuC compound, rather than
AuN or AuO: First, the intermixing of gold into the carbon matrix has been
observed on the single-atom level in the heating experiment (Figure
1), so that it is reasonable to assume the same elements also in the
few-atom gold clusters. Second, gold oxide and gold nitride have been reported
previously in the literature3435363738 to exhibit different
stoichiometry and crystal structures. Third, it has been found that the cuboids
decompose at temperatures higher than 1000 K. This is in strong contrast
to the decomposition temperature known for gold oxide and gold nitride3738.
Conclusion
In summary, atomically resolved in-situ TEM studies of the heat-
and irradiation-induced formation of novel gold structures on graphene have
been presented. Periodic arrangements of individual gold atoms have been found
in form of rectangularly shaped atomic monolayers and bilayers as well as
entire cuboids of many atomic layers. Both, DFT calculations and EELS analysis
provide clear evidence for the formation of a crystalline compound of gold
and carbon in a zincblende structure. These AuC nanocrystals are stable under
electron irradiation, under ambient conditions, and up to temperatures of
ca. 1000 K in vacuum. On the theoretical side, they are predicted to
be metallic and exhibit a bulk modulus of 141 GPa. Other properties
of this exciting new material remain to be explored.
Methods
In-situ TEM
The experiments have been performed applying aberration corrected AC-HRTEM
on a TITAN 80–300 FEI microscope at an accelerating voltage of 80 kV.
It has been operated with a small positive value of the spherical aberration C
= 10 μm and underfocus conditions that resulted in black atom contrast.
The field assisted Schottky electron emitter was operated with reduced extraction
voltage of 2000 V to increase the information limit39.
The TEM was equipped with a Gatan Quantum GIF 965 energy filter for local
electron energy loss spectroscopy. The sample was loaded via a cartridge into
a Fischione 2510 biasing holder. An electrical heating current was controlled
via a Keithley multimeter and passed through the graphene sample by applying
a bias voltage between the electrodes, with a current-density in the range
of 2·107 Acm−2 at an applied
bias of 2 V.
DFT calculations
The DFT calculations have been performed within the generalized gradient
approximation (GGA) for the exchange-correlation functional40
using the Vienna ab-initio simulation package (VASP)4142.
In order to account for electron-ion interactions, the projector augmented
wave method (PAW)4344 has been used. The electronic one-particle
wave functions were expanded in a plane wave basis set up to an energy cut-off
of 400 eV. The bulk modulus has been derived by fitting the calculated
dependence of the bulk energy as a function of volume to the Birch-Murnaghan
isothermal equation of state45.
Authors: U Kaiser; J Biskupek; J C Meyer; J Leschner; L Lechner; H Rose; M Stöger-Pollach; A N Khlobystov; P Hartel; H Müller; M Haider; S Eyhusen; G Benner Journal: Ultramicroscopy Date: 2011-04-01 Impact factor: 2.689
Authors: Ovidiu Cretu; Arkady V Krasheninnikov; Julio A Rodríguez-Manzo; Litao Sun; Risto M Nieminen; Florian Banhart Journal: Phys Rev Lett Date: 2010-11-05 Impact factor: 9.161