Literature DB >> 25772267

Adverse airway events in parturient compared with non-parturient patients. Is there a difference? Results from a quality management project.

Sebastian Heinrich1, Andrea Irouschek1, Johannes Prottengeier1, Andreas Ackermann1, Joachim Schmidt1.   

Abstract

AIM: The fear of airway problems often leads to prolonged attempts to obtain neuroaxial (spinal anesthesia or epidural anesthesia) anesthesia in obstetric anesthesia. The aim of this institutional quality management study was to revisit existing anesthesia care in the obstetric department, focusing on the frequency of delayed or failed neuroaxial anesthesia as well as the risk of airway problems in parturient and non-obstetric patients.
METHODS: The clinical records from 8 consecutive years (2005-2013) were analyzed retrospectively. Cases of cesarean delivery with general anesthesia were analyzed and compared with an age-matched group of female patients undergoing non-obstetric abdominal or gynecological surgery with rapid sequence induction. Poor laryngeal visualization (Cormack-Lehane grade III or IV) and failed intubation were recorded.
RESULTS: The records of 6393 cesarean deliveries including 851 with general anesthesia were analyzed. In 175 cases insufficient or delayed onset of regional anesthesia led to requirement for general anesthesia. The rate of poor laryngoscopic view in parturient women undergoing cesarean delivery was 14/851, and 4/814 in the reference group (P = 0.023). Failed intubation occurred in three patients undergoing cesarean delivery (0.4%) and in one non-obstetric patient (0.1%; P = 0.339).
CONCLUSION: The rate of failed intubations in patients undergoing cesarean delivery may be equivalent to non-obstetric patients. In time-challenging cesarean deliveries, delay of conversion from non-successful neuroaxial anesthesia to general anesthesia in order to avoid adverse airway events does not appear to be justified.
© 2015 The Authors. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research © 2015 Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adverse airway event; difficult airway; emergency cesarean delivery; obstetric anesthesia; poor laryngoscopic view

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25772267     DOI: 10.1111/jog.12677

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res        ISSN: 1341-8076            Impact factor:   1.730


  2 in total

1.  Laryngeal Mask Airway for Cesarean Delivery: A 5-Year Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Zhi-Yu Geng; Dong-Xin Wang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 2.628

2.  Canadian Airway Focus Group updated consensus-based recommendations for management of the difficult airway: part 1. Difficult airway management encountered in an unconscious patient.

Authors:  J Adam Law; Laura V Duggan; Mathieu Asselin; Paul Baker; Edward Crosby; Andrew Downey; Orlando R Hung; Philip M Jones; François Lemay; Rudiger Noppens; Matteo Parotto; Roanne Preston; Nick Sowers; Kathryn Sparrow; Timothy P Turkstra; David T Wong; George Kovacs
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 5.063

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.