| Literature DB >> 25771905 |
Eva-Maria Gamper1, Lisa M Wintner, Margarida Rodrigues, Sabine Buxbaum, Bernhard Nilica, Susanne Singer, Johannes M Giesinger, Bernhard Holzner, Irene Virgolini.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) research has so far received little attention and available results are conflicting. We studied the HRQOL of radioiodine-naive DTC patients in comparison with the general population (GP), investigated the course of HRQOL up to 30 months after radioiodine remnant ablation (RAA) and sought to identify patient characteristics associated with HRQOL.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25771905 PMCID: PMC4480943 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-015-3022-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging ISSN: 1619-7070 Impact factor: 9.236
Fig. 1Flow diagram of the patient selection process
Patient characteristics
| Characteristic | Aim 1: cross-sectional comparison | Aim 2: longitudinal analyses of HRQOL | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RAIT-naive patients ( | Included patients ( | Excluded patientsa ( |
| |
| Age (years), mean ± SD | 48.3 ± 15.0 | 48.6 ± 15.9 | 47.8 ± 13.0 | 0.563 |
| Sex: female, | 204 (71.6) | 166 (68.9) | 63 (68.4) | 0.559 |
| Histology, | ||||
| Papillary | 230 (80.7) | 184 (76.3) | 83 (91.2) | 0.002 |
| Follicular | 55 (19.3) | 57 (23.7) | 9 (9.8) | |
| Tumour stage, | ||||
| I + II | 217 (76.1) | 181 (75.1) | 72 (78.3) | 0.548 |
| III + IVa | 60 (21.1) | 53 (22.0) | 18 (19.6) | |
| Missing | 8 (2.8) | 7 (2.9) | 2 (2.2) | |
| Assessment method, | ||||
| Paper and pencil | 139 (48.8) | |||
| Computer-based | 146 (51.2) | |||
aThe reasons for inclusion/exclusion are shown in the Statistical analysis section and the flow diagram in Fig. 1
b p value is from the t-test or χ 2 − test for group comparisons
Details of 705 assessments performed in the 241 patients included in the longitudinal analysis
| Assessments | Value |
|---|---|
| Time since diagnosis (months), mean ± SD | 13.3 ± 11.6 |
| Number of RAIT cycles, median (IQR)a | 1.0 (1.0) |
| Number of assessments at each time-point, | |
| Baseline | 198 |
| 6 months | 195 |
| 12 months | 104 |
| 18 months | 94 |
| 24 months | 53 |
| 30 months | 61 |
| Admission reason, | |
| Therapy | 261 (37.0) |
| Follow-up | 444 (63.0) |
| Method of TSH stimulation, | |
| Exogenous | 46 (6.5)b |
| Endogenous | 657 (93.2) |
| Missing | 2 (0.3) |
| Assessment method, | |
| Paper and pencil | 424 (60.1) |
| Computer-based | 281 (39.9) |
aTherapeutic doses 3.7 and 7.4 GBq
b41 patients with 46 assessments
Fig. 2Interaction between patient samples (GP vs. DTC patients) and sex and age for appetite loss
Sex-adjusted and age-adjusted marginal means for patients and the GP with 95 % confidence intervals and parameters for interaction effects
| Domain | Marginal means (95 % CI) | Interactions effects | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patients | General population | Mean differencea |
| Sample × sexb |
| Sample × agec |
| |
| Physical functioningd | 82 (81 – 84) | 90 (88 – 92) |
| <0.001 | ||||
| Role functioning | 62 (59 – 66) | 87 (83 – 90) |
| <0.001 | −11 | 0.033 | ||
| Social functioning | 73 (70 – 77) | 84 (81 – 87) |
| 0.001 | −11 | 0.026 | 0.33 | 0.026 |
| Emotional functioninge | 63 (60 – 66) | 72 (69 – 75) |
| <0.001 | ||||
| Cognitive functioninge,d | 80 (77 – 83) | 83 (80 – 86) | 3 | 0.138 | −10 | 0.017 | ||
| Global QOLd | 61 (58 – 64) | 76 (74 – 79) |
| <0.001 | ||||
| Fatiguee | 45 (2 – 47) | 22 (19 – 25) |
| <0.001 | ||||
| Nausea/vomiting | 7 (5 – 9) | 4 (3 – 6) | 3 | 0.013 | ||||
| Paind | 22 (18 – 25) | 20 (17 – 23) | 2 | 0.014 | −0.33 | 0.017 | ||
| Dyspnoead | 22 (20 – 25) | 9 (7 – 12) |
| <0.001 | ||||
| Sleep disturbanced | 39 (36 – 43) | 24 (21 – 27) |
| <0.001 | ||||
| Appetite losse | 16 (13 – 19) | 6 (4 – 9) |
| <0.001 | 8.7 | 0.040 | −0.28 | 0.033 |
| Constipatione | 15 (12 – 18) | 8 (5 – 11) |
| 0.001 | ||||
| Diarrhoeae | 8 (5 – 10) | 9 (7 – 11) | 1 | 0.532 | ||||
| Financial impactd | 12 (9 – 15) | 10 (7 – 12) | 2 | 0.335 | ||||
aClinically meaningful differences in bold type
bReference group: male
Reference group: patient
dMain effect of age worse scores with increasing age (p ≤ 0.030):
eSignificant main effect of sex worse scores in women (p ≤ 0.007):
Fig. 3Scales with significant changes over time (adjusted for effects of age, sex and method of TSH stimulation)
Fig. 4Scales with a significant impact of method of TSH stimulation
Marginal means for clinical subgroups with significant score differences
| Domain | Marginal means (95 % CI) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Method of TSH stimulation | Stage | |||
| Endogenous | Exogenous | Localized | Distant | |
| Physical functioninga,b | 82 (78 – 85) | 88 (83 – 92) | 88 (82 – 92) | 81 (79 – 85) |
| Role functioningc | 70 (66 – 73) | 80 (71 – 88) | ||
| Social functioninga | 78 (75 – 81) | 86 (79 – 93) | ||
| Emotional functioninga,c | ||||
| Cognitive functioningd | 74 (71 – 77) | 83 (76 – 90) | ||
| Global QOL | 62 (60 – 65) | 72 (65 – 78) | ||
| Fatiguea,c | 42 (20 – 35) | 28 (39 – 46) | ||
| Nausea/vomiting | ||||
| Painc | ||||
| Dyspnoea | ||||
| Sleep disturbancea,b,c | 36 (32 – 40) | 26 (17 – 35) | ||
| Appetite loss | 17 (14 – 19) | 6 (0 – 14) | ||
| Constipationa | ||||
| Diarrhoea | ||||
| Financial impact | ||||
aAdjusted for impact of sex: worse scores in women (p ≤ 0.021)
bAdjusted for impact of age: worse scores with increasing age (p ≤ 0.025)
cAdjusted for time since diagnosis (p ≤ 0.01)
dAdjusted for assessment method and its interaction with age (p = 0.001)