Literature DB >> 25771756

Outrigger rod technique for supplemental support of posterior spinal arthrodesis.

Mark A Palumbo1, Kalpit N Shah1, Craig P Eberson1, Robert A Hart2, Alan H Daniels3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Instrumentation failure is a recognized complication after complex spinal reconstruction and deformity correction. Rod fracture (RF) is the most frequent mode of hardware failure in long-segment spinal fusion surgery. This complication can negatively impact the clinical outcome by producing spinal pain, functional compromise, instability, and loss of deformity correction.
PURPOSE: To describe the outrigger rod surgical technique. STUDY
DESIGN: Review of literature, case review, and surgical technique description. PATIENT SAMPLE: Two clinical cases are presented. OUTCOME MEASURES: Rod fracture.
METHODS: Outrigger rod placement in posterior spinal arthrodesis is performed by supplementing primary spinal rods with outrigger rods attached with cranial and caudal side-by-side connectors providing a more robust construct.
RESULTS: This technique may be beneficial for preventing RF in patients undergoing surgery for three-column osteotomy for sagittal imbalance; pseudarthrosis surgery with previous hardware failure; transforaminal lumbar interbody cage placement at multiple levels in realignment procedures, long-segment spinal arthrodesis with impaired host fusion potential; long-segment instrumented fusions that span the cervicothoracic, thoracolumbar, or lumbosacral junction; and across spinal segments at high risk for RF (eg, after extensive resection of vertebral elements in the management of metastatic malignancy).
CONCLUSIONS: The risk of rod failure is substantial in the setting of long-segment spinal arthrodesis and corrective osteotomy. Efforts to increase the mechanical strength of posterior constructs may reduce the occurrence of this complication. The outrigger rod technique increases spinal construct stiffness and may improve the longevity of the construct. This technique should reduce the rate of device failure during maturation of posterior fusion mass and limit the need for supplemental anterior column support.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Instrumentation failure; Long-segment fusion; Ourigger rod; Revision surgery; Rod fracture (RF); Spinal deformity

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25771756     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  13 in total

1.  Supplementary delta-rod configurations provide superior stiffness and reduced rod stress compared to traditional multiple-rod configurations after pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a finite element study.

Authors:  Pedro Berjano; Ming Xu; Marco Damilano; Thomas Scholl; Claudio Lamartina; Michael Jekir; Fabio Galbusera
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-05-25       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Instrumentation failure following pedicle subtraction osteotomy: the role of rod material, diameter, and multi-rod constructs.

Authors:  Andrea Luca; Claudia Ottardi; Maurizio Sasso; Liliana Prosdocimo; Luigi La Barbera; Marco Brayda-Bruno; Fabio Galbusera; Tomaso Villa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Anterior instrumentation through posterior approach in neglected congenital kyphosis: a novel technique and case series.

Authors:  Belal Elnady; Ahmed Shawky Abdelgawaad; Mohamed El-Meshtawy
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Multiple-rod constructs in adult spinal deformity surgery for pelvic-fixated long instrumentations: an integral matched cohort analysis.

Authors:  Fernando Guevara-Villazón; Louis Boissiere; Kazunori Hayashi; Daniel Larrieu; Soufiane Ghailane; Jean-Marc Vital; Olivier Gille; Vincent Pointillart; Ibrahim Obeid; Anouar Bourghli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Posterior column reconstruction improves fusion rates at the level of osteotomy in three-column posterior-based osteotomies.

Authors:  Stephen J Lewis; Chandan Mohanty; Aaron M Gazendam; So Kato; Sam G Keshen; Noah D Lewis; Sofia P Magana; David Perlmutter; Jennifer Cape
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Minimally invasive multiple-rod constructs with robotics planning in adult spinal deformity surgery: a case series.

Authors:  Martin H Pham; Vrajesh J Shah; Luis Daniel Diaz-Aguilar; Joseph A Osorio; Ronald A Lehman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Etiology and Management of Spinal Deformity in Patients With Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Roy Ruttiman; Adam E M Eltorai; Alan H Daniels
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-03-30

8.  Designing patient-specific solutions using biomodelling and 3D-printing for revision lumbar spine surgery.

Authors:  Ganesha K Thayaparan; Mark G Owbridge; Robert G Thompson; Paul S D'Urso
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Dual S2 Alar-Iliac Screw Technique With a Multirod Construct Across the Lumbosacral Junction: Obtaining Adequate Stability at the Lumbosacral Junction in Spinal Deformity Surgery.

Authors:  Paul J Park; James D Lin; Melvin C Makhni; Meghan Cerpa; Ronald A Lehman; Lawrence G Lenke
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2019-11-04

10.  Biomechanical comparison between titanium and cobalt chromium rods used in a pedicle subtraction osteotomy model.

Authors:  Kalpit N Shah; Gregory Walker; Sarath C Koruprolu; Alan H Daniels
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2018-03-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.