Ronald A Lehman1, Daniel G Kang2, Scott C Wagner2, Haines Paik3, Mario J Cardoso4, Joshua D Bernstock5, Anton E Dmitriev5. 1. Department of Orthopaedics, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, 8901 Wisconsin Ave, Bldg 19, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA; Division of Orthopaedics, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, 4301 Jones Bridge Rd, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA. Electronic address: armyspine@yahoo.com. 2. Department of Orthopaedics, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, 8901 Wisconsin Ave, Bldg 19, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA; Division of Orthopaedics, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, 4301 Jones Bridge Rd, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA. 3. Department of Orthopaedics, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, 8901 Wisconsin Ave, Bldg 19, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA. 4. Department of Neurosurgery, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, 8901 Wisconsin Ave, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA. 5. Division of Orthopaedics, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, 4301 Jones Bridge Rd, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Transverse connectors (TCs) are often used to improve the rigidity of posterior spinal instrumentation as previous investigations have suggested that TCs enhance torsional rigidity in long-segment thoracic constructs. Posterior osteotomies, such as pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO), are used in severe thoracic deformities and provide a significant amount of correction; as a consequence, however, PSOs also induce three-column spinal instability. In theory, augmentation of longitudinal constructs with TC after a thoracic PSO may provide additional rigidity, but the concept has not been previously evaluated. PURPOSE: To evaluate the biomechanical contribution of TC to the rigidity of a long-segment pedicle screw-rod construct after a thoracic PSO. STUDY DESIGN: An in vitro fresh-frozen human cadaveric biomechanical analysis. METHODS: Seven human cadaveric thoracic spines were prepared and instrumented from T4-T10 with bilateral pedicle screws/rods and a PSO was performed at T7. Intact range of motion (ROM) testing was performed with nondestructive loading and analyzed by loading modality (axial rotation [AR], flexion/extension [FE], and lateral bending [LB]). Range of motion analysis was performed in the unaugmented construct, the construct augmented with one TC, and the construct augmented with two TCs. RESULTS: After PSO and an unaugmented longitudinal pedicle screw-rod construct, T4-T10 (overall construct) and T6-T8 (PSO site) ROMs were significantly reduced in all planes of motion compared with intact condition (AR: 11.8° vs. 31.7°; FE: 2.4° vs. 12.3°; 3.4° vs. 17.9°, respectively, p<.05). Augmentation of longitudinal construct with either one or two TCs did not significantly increase construct rigidity in FE or LB compared with the unaugmented construct (p>.05). In contrast, during AR, global ROM was significantly reduced by 43% and 48% at T6-T8 (1.7° and 1.2° vs. 2.38°, respectively) after addition of one and two TCs (p<.05), respectively. One TC did not significantly reduce torsional ROM from the intact state. CONCLUSIONS: Two TCs significantly improved torsional rigidity of the entire construct and at the PSO site, with no differences in rigidity for FE and LB or with the addition of only one TC. In the setting of a PSO and long-segment pedicle screw-rod construct, augmentation with at least two TCs should be considered to improve torsional rigidity. Published by Elsevier Inc.
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Transverse connectors (TCs) are often used to improve the rigidity of posterior spinal instrumentation as previous investigations have suggested that TCs enhance torsional rigidity in long-segment thoracic constructs. Posterior osteotomies, such as pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO), are used in severe thoracic deformities and provide a significant amount of correction; as a consequence, however, PSOs also induce three-column spinal instability. In theory, augmentation of longitudinal constructs with TC after a thoracic PSO may provide additional rigidity, but the concept has not been previously evaluated. PURPOSE: To evaluate the biomechanical contribution of TC to the rigidity of a long-segment pedicle screw-rod construct after a thoracic PSO. STUDY DESIGN: An in vitro fresh-frozen human cadaveric biomechanical analysis. METHODS: Seven human cadaveric thoracic spines were prepared and instrumented from T4-T10 with bilateral pedicle screws/rods and a PSO was performed at T7. Intact range of motion (ROM) testing was performed with nondestructive loading and analyzed by loading modality (axial rotation [AR], flexion/extension [FE], and lateral bending [LB]). Range of motion analysis was performed in the unaugmented construct, the construct augmented with one TC, and the construct augmented with two TCs. RESULTS: After PSO and an unaugmented longitudinal pedicle screw-rod construct, T4-T10 (overall construct) and T6-T8 (PSO site) ROMs were significantly reduced in all planes of motion compared with intact condition (AR: 11.8° vs. 31.7°; FE: 2.4° vs. 12.3°; 3.4° vs. 17.9°, respectively, p<.05). Augmentation of longitudinal construct with either one or two TCs did not significantly increase construct rigidity in FE or LB compared with the unaugmented construct (p>.05). In contrast, during AR, global ROM was significantly reduced by 43% and 48% at T6-T8 (1.7° and 1.2° vs. 2.38°, respectively) after addition of one and two TCs (p<.05), respectively. One TC did not significantly reduce torsional ROM from the intact state. CONCLUSIONS: Two TCs significantly improved torsional rigidity of the entire construct and at the PSO site, with no differences in rigidity for FE and LB or with the addition of only one TC. In the setting of a PSO and long-segment pedicle screw-rod construct, augmentation with at least two TCs should be considered to improve torsional rigidity. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Luigi La Barbera; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Christian Liebsch; Tomaso Villa; Andrea Luca; Fabio Galbusera; Marco Brayda-Bruno Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2019-08-14 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Benny T Dahl; Jonathan A Harris; Manasa Gudipally; Mark Moldavsky; Saif Khalil; Brandon S Bucklen Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2017-08-02 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Iulian Popa; Manuel Oprea; Diana Andrei; Peter Mercedesz; Mihai Mardare; Dan V Poenaru Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2016-02-24 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Luigi La Barbera; Marco Brayda-Bruno; Christian Liebsch; Tomaso Villa; Andrea Luca; Fabio Galbusera; Hans-Joachim Wilke Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2018-05-08 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Luigi La Barbera; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Maria Luisa Ruspi; Marco Palanca; Christian Liebsch; Andrea Luca; Marco Brayda-Bruno; Fabio Galbusera; Luca Cristofolini Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-02-11 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Marco D Burkhard; Frédéric Cornaz; José Miguel Spirig; Florian Wanivenhaus; Rafael Loucas; Marie-Rosa Fasser; Jonas Widmer; Mazda Farshad Journal: N Am Spine Soc J Date: 2021-11-17