Literature DB >> 25771371

Pharmacokinetic, Dosimetry and Toxicity Study of ¹⁷⁷Lu-EDTMP in Patients: Phase 0/I study.

Chandrasekhar Bal1, Geetanjali Arora, Praveen Kumar, Nishikant Damle, Tapas Das, Sudipta Chakraborty, Sharmila Banerjee, Meera Venkatesh, John J Zaknun, M R A Pillai.   

Abstract

177Lu-EDTMP has been proposed as a potent bone pain palliation agent owing to theoretical advantage of reduced bone marrow suppression resulting from the low β(-) energy and a suitably long half-life facilitating its wider distribution with less loss from radioactive decay. Herein, we report the pharmacokinetics, dosimetry and toxicity analysis of 177Lu-EDTMP in patients (phase-0/I study). In a phase-0 study, the biokinetics of skeletal and non-skeletal uptake of 177Lu-EDTMP was assessed in 6 patients with metastatic prostate cancer using tracer doses (172.7-206.9MBq). Data of whole skeletal uptake, blood and fractionated urine samples were obtained and dosimetric calculations were performed using the OLINDA/EXM 1.0 software. Prolonged bone retention was observed in all patients. Excretion was mainly via the renal route and blood clearance was rapid and biphasic. Mean estimated red marrow dose was 0.80±0.15mGy/MBq while mean total-body dose was 0.16±0.04mGy/MBq. A maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of 2000-3250MBqfor 177Lu-EDTMP was calculated. For the phase-I study, 21 patients with metastatic prostate cancer were given a therapeutic dose of 177Lu- EDTMP (692-5550MBq). Toxiciy (WHO), evaluated by assessment of hemoglobin levels, platelet and leukocyte counts over 12 weeks, was mainly limited to anemia or thrombocytopenia. Only transient toxicity was observed in 14/21 patients, of which 6 had baseline toxicity. Beyond the MTD, a significantly higher number of patients displayed grade 3-4 toxicity. Pain relief, assessed by VAS pain score, was observed in 86% patients with median relief duration of 7 weeks. The results demonstrate that 177Lu-EDTMP has excellent pharmacokinetic and dosimetric properties, besides being safe and effective. Along with estimating radiation dose values to certain critical organs, we have also proposed an MTD for 177Lu-EDTMP that correlated well with toxicity data. The encouraging dosimetry and toxicity data of 177Lu-EDTMP reported provide the basis for subsequent phases of the studies to establish complete effectiveness and safety of 177Lu-EDTMP as an attractive alternative to other radioactive bone pain palliation agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 25771371     DOI: 10.2174/1874471008666150313105000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Radiopharm        ISSN: 1874-4710


  5 in total

Review 1.  Phase 0/microdosing approaches: time for mainstream application in drug development?

Authors:  Tal Burt; Graeme Young; Wooin Lee; Hiroyuki Kusuhara; Oliver Langer; Malcolm Rowland; Yuichi Sugiyama
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 2.  A review of advances in the last decade on targeted cancer therapy using 177Lu: focusing on 177Lu produced by the direct neutron activation route.

Authors:  Rubel Chakravarty; Sudipta Chakraborty
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-12-15

3.  Comparative Therapeutic Efficacy of 153Sm-EDTMP and 177Lu-EDTMP for Bone Pain Palliation in Patients with Skeletal Metastases: Patients' Pain Score Analysis and Personalized Dosimetry.

Authors:  Sarika Sharma; Baljinder Singh; Ashwani Koul; Bhagwant Rai Mittal
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2017-05-01

4.  Biodistribution and post-therapy dosimetric analysis of [177Lu]Lu-DOTAZOL in patients with osteoblastic metastases: first results.

Authors:  Ambreen Khawar; Elisabeth Eppard; Frank Roesch; Hojjat Ahmadzadehfar; Stefan Kürpig; Michael Meisenheimer; Florian C Gaertner; Markus Essler; Ralph A Bundschuh
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 3.138

Review 5.  Strategic, feasibility, economic, and cultural aspects of phase 0 approaches: Is it time to change the drug development process in order to increase productivity?

Authors:  Tal Burt; Ad F Roffel; Oliver Langer; Kirsten Anderson; Joseph DiMasi
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 4.438

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.