Literature DB >> 25771281

Using clinical registries to improve the quality of neurosurgical care.

Anthony L Asher1, Scott L Parker2, John D Rolston3, Nathan R Selden4, Matthew J McGirt5.   

Abstract

Despite rising and unsustainable US health care costs, many stakeholders feel that the quality of medical services is limited and inconsistent. Value-based reforms are touted as the key to achieving health care system sustainability. Health care value is defined as quality delivered divided by cost incurred. Unfortunately, quality in health care is difficult to accurately define and methods to reliably assess and report health care quality are often lacking. Clinical registries have emerged as important mechanisms to define, measure, and promote health care quality. The purpose of this article is to describe the role of registries in neurosurgical quality improvement.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Database; Patient outcomes; Quality improvement; Registry

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25771281     DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2014.11.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Clin N Am        ISSN: 1042-3680            Impact factor:   2.509


  2 in total

1.  Major and minor complications in extraoperative electrocorticography: A review of a national database.

Authors:  John D Rolston; Dario J Englot; Susannah Cornes; Edward F Chang
Journal:  Epilepsy Res       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 3.045

2.  Surgical intervention for hydrocephalus in infancy; etiology, age and treatment data in a Dutch cohort.

Authors:  J C Holwerda; E J van Lindert; D R Buis; E W Hoving
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 1.475

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.