Literature DB >> 25771213

The direct and indirect costs of uterine fibroid tumors: a systematic review of the literature between 2000 and 2013.

Ahmed M Soliman1, Hongbo Yang2, Ella Xiaoyan Du2, Sneha S Kelkar3, Craig Winkel4.   

Abstract

This systematic literature review was conducted to summarize the direct and indirect costs per patient that are associated with uterine fibroid tumors in international studies. A search with predefined search terms was conducted in MEDLINE and EMBASE for studies that were published from January 2000 to November 2013. The review included primary studies that were in English and that reported either direct costs (drug costs, procedure costs, and medical service costs) or indirect costs (such as productivity loss) among patients with uterine fibroid tumors. A total of 26 studies that were identified and included in the data extraction included 19 studies in the United States, 2 studies in the Netherlands, 1 study each in Germany, China, Italy, and Canada, and 1 study reported data that were collected from 3 countries: Germany, France, and England. The studies differed substantially in perspectives that were adopted for analysis, research designs, data elements that were collected, setting, populations, and outcome measurements. Among 3 studies that reported total direct costs during the year after uterine fibroid tumor diagnosis, 2 studies reported an average of $9473 and $9319 per patient, respectively; 2 studies reported the excess costs over controls to be $6076 and $5427, respectively. The indirect costs per patient ranged from $2399-15,549, and the excess indirect cost per patient over control groups ranged from $323-4824 in the year after the diagnosis. The total costs, sum of direct and indirect costs, ranged from $11,717-25,023 per patient per year, after diagnosis or surgery among patients with uterine fibroid tumors. Compared with control subjects, the additional annual cost ranged from $2200-15,952 per patient. The results of this systematic literature review highlight the substantial direct and indirect costs that are associated with uterine fibroid tumors to health care payers and society. The large number and the variety of studies identified also emphasize the growing awareness of the significant economic impact of uterine fibroid tumors. Current gaps that were identified through this review warrant further investigation to elucidate fully the economic burden of uterine fibroid tumors, including, but not limited to, burden from the patient's perspective and the entirety of indirect costs.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  direct cost; indirect cost; systematic literature review; uterine fibroid tumor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25771213     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.03.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  31 in total

1.  Uterine fibroid incidence and growth in an ultrasound-based, prospective study of young African Americans.

Authors:  Donna D Baird; Stacy A Patchel; Tina M Saldana; David M Umbach; Tracy Cooper; Ganesa Wegienka; Quaker E Harmon
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 2.  Current approaches to overcome the side effects of GnRH analogs in the treatment of patients with uterine fibroids.

Authors:  Mohamed Ali; Mohamed Raslan; Michał Ciebiera; Kornelia Zaręba; Ayman Al-Hendy
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Saf       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 4.250

3.  Racial/Ethnic Differences in Women's Experiences with Symptomatic Uterine Fibroids: a Qualitative Assessment.

Authors:  Katherine S Sengoba; Marissa S Ghant; Ijeoma Okeigwe; Gricelda Mendoza; Erica E Marsh
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2016-04-11

4.  A Prospective Ultrasound Study of Plasma Polychlorinated Biphenyl Concentrations and Incidence of Uterine Leiomyomata.

Authors:  Amelia K Wesselink; Birgit Claus Henn; Victoria Fruh; Olivia R Orta; Jennifer Weuve; Russ Hauser; Paige L Williams; Michael D McClean; Andreas Sjodin; Traci N Bethea; Theodore M Brasky; Donna D Baird; Lauren A Wise
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 4.822

5.  Health Care Costs and Treatment Patterns Associated with Uterine Fibroids and Heavy Menstrual Bleeding: A Claims Analysis.

Authors:  Alice Wang; Siting Wang; Charlotte D Owens; Jamie B Vora; Michael P Diamond
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 3.017

Review 6.  Role of Transforming Growth Factor β in Uterine Fibroid Biology.

Authors:  Michał Ciebiera; Marta Włodarczyk; Małgorzata Wrzosek; Błażej Męczekalski; Grażyna Nowicka; Krzysztof Łukaszuk; Magdalena Ciebiera; Aneta Słabuszewska-Jóźwiak; Grzegorz Jakiel
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Cost and Distribution of Hysterectomy and Uterine Artery Embolization in the United States: Regional/Rural/Urban Disparities.

Authors:  Marquisette Glass Lewis; Olúgbémiga T Ekúndayò
Journal:  Med Sci (Basel)       Date:  2017-05-16

Review 8.  Alternative Oral Agents in Prophylaxis and Therapy of Uterine Fibroids-An Up-to-Date Review.

Authors:  Michał Ciebiera; Krzysztof Łukaszuk; Błażej Męczekalski; Magdalena Ciebiera; Cezary Wojtyła; Aneta Słabuszewska-Jóźwiak; Grzegorz Jakiel
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 9.  Uterine fibroid management: from the present to the future.

Authors:  Jacques Donnez; Marie-Madeleine Dolmans
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 15.610

Review 10.  The Significance of Measuring Vitamin D Serum Levels in Women with Uterine Fibroids.

Authors:  Michał Ciebiera; Mohamed Ali; Lillian Prince; Stanisław Zgliczyński; Grzegorz Jakiel; Ayman Al-Hendy
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 3.060

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.