Literature DB >> 25771102

Utility of postoperative CEA for surveillance of recurrence after resection of primary colorectal cancer.

Imran Bhatti1, Meera Patel2, Ashley R Dennison2, Michael W Thomas2, Giuseppe Garcea2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the usefulness of postoperative CEA levels in the surveillance of colorectal cancer patients.
METHODS: Over a 56 month period a total of 569 patients with measured CEA levels underwent curative resection for colorectal cancer. The median follow up was 40 months, during which period recurrence occurred in 149. Serum CEA levels were measured at 6 monthly intervals starting from 3 months post resection. ROC was used to calculate the optimum cut-off of CEA (5 ng/ml).
RESULTS: Postoperative elevation of CEA levels were more frequent in patients with an aggressive primary colorectal cancer (grade, T stage and nodal disease; p < 0.05). In patients found to have colorectal recurrence, a significantly higher proportion of patients were resectable in the group with a non-elevated CEA (diagnosed by CT with PET imaging p < 0.05). The median interval between CEA elevation and diagnosis of recurrence (diagnostic interval) was 4 weeks. CEA elevation led to a change in the routine surveillance program by bringing imaging forward by 2 months. CEA levels were a significant predictor of survival following resection of colorectal primary (CEA ≤5-38 months, CEA >5-27 months; p < 0.05). CEA (p < 0.05) retained its significance on multivariate analysis along with the T stage (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: CEA is a predictor of recurrence, resectability and survival following resection of colorectal cancer. Furthermore, an elevated CEA has a short diagnostic interval (4 weeks) for detecting recurrent disease and therefore should mandate adjustment of the routine surveillance program with the next planned imaging being brought forward (2 months).
Copyright © 2015 Surgical Associates Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CEA; Colorectal cancer; Surveillance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25771102     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Surg        ISSN: 1743-9159            Impact factor:   6.071


  19 in total

1.  Effect of Vein-First vs Artery-First Surgical Technique on Circulating Tumor Cells and Survival in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial and Registry-Based Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Authors:  Shiyou Wei; Chenglin Guo; Jintao He; Qunyou Tan; Jiandong Mei; Zhenyu Yang; Chengwu Liu; Qiang Pu; Lin Ma; Yong Yuan; Feng Lin; Yunke Zhu; Hu Liao; Wenping Wang; Zheng Liu; Qiang Li; Bin Jiang; Chuan Li; Liang Xia; Kejia Zhao; Fanyi Gan; Jiahan Cheng; Zhu Wu; Yun Wang; Yidan Lin; Yingli Kou; Guowei Che; Longqi Chen; Jing Li; Lunxu Liu
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 14.766

2.  Postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level has a prognostic value for distant metastasis and survival in rectal cancer patients who receive preoperative chemoradiotherapy and curative surgery: a retrospective multi-institutional analysis.

Authors:  Songmi Jeong; Taek Keun Nam; Jae Uk Jeong; Sung Hwan Kim; Kyubo Kim; Hong Seok Jang; Bae Kwon Jeong; Jong Hoon Lee
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 5.150

3.  iTRAQ-based quantitative analysis of cancer-derived secretory proteome reveals TPM2 as a potential diagnostic biomarker of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Yiming Ma; Ting Xiao; Quan Xu; Xinxin Shao; Hongying Wang
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 4.  Prognostic Factors Involved in the Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Process in Colorectal Cancer Have a Preponderant Role in Oxidative Stress: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Eva Parisi; Anabel Sorolla; Robert Montal; Rita González-Resina; Anna Novell; Antonieta Salud; Maria Alba Sorolla
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Highly accurate colorectal cancer prediction model based on Raman spectroscopy using patient serum.

Authors:  Hiroaki Ito; Naoyuki Uragami; Tomokazu Miyazaki; William Yang; Kenji Issha; Kai Matsuo; Satoshi Kimura; Yuji Arai; Hiromasa Tokunaga; Saiko Okada; Machiko Kawamura; Noboru Yokoyama; Miki Kushima; Haruhiro Inoue; Takashi Fukagai; Yumi Kamijo
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2020-11-15

6.  A SPR biosensor based on signal amplification using antibody-QD conjugates for quantitative determination of multiple tumor markers.

Authors:  Huan Wang; Xiaomei Wang; Jue Wang; Weiling Fu; Chunyan Yao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Vein-first vs artery-first surgical technique for lobectomy of non-small cell lung cancer: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lei Gao; Zhimin Shen; Hui Xu; Fei Luo; Peipei Zhang; Tianci Chai; Sui Chen; Mingqiang Kang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  Identifying the Best Marker Combination in CEA, CA125, CY211, NSE, and SCC for Lung Cancer Screening by Combining ROC Curve and Logistic Regression Analyses: Is It Feasible?

Authors:  Qixian Yang; Ping Zhang; Rongqiang Wu; Kefeng Lu; Hongxing Zhou
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 3.434

9.  The prognostic value of the postoperative serum CEA levels/preoperative serum CEA levels ratio in colorectal cancer patients with high preoperative serum CEA levels.

Authors:  Hai-Lun Xie; Yi-Zhen Gong; Jia-An Kuang; Feng Gao; Shuang-Yi Tang; Jia-Liang Gan
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 3.989

10.  Artery-first vs vein-first surgical technique for segmentectomy of non-small cell lung cancer: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhangwei Tong; Jiekun Qian; Xiaojie Yang; Lin Jiangbo
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.