Jorge Canena1, Manuel Liberato2, Liliane Meireles3, Inês Marques3, Carlos Romão3, António Pereira Coutinho2, Beatriz Costa Neves3, Pedro Mota Veiga4. 1. Center of Gastroenterology, Cuf Infante Santo Hospital-Nova Medical School/Faculty of Medical Sciences, Lisbon, Portugal; Department of Gastroenterology, Pulido Valente Hospital do Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, Lisbon, Portugal; Department of Endoscopy, José Joaquim Fernandes Hospital da Unidade Local de Saúde do Baixo Alentejo, Beja, Portugal. 2. Center of Gastroenterology, Cuf Infante Santo Hospital-Nova Medical School/Faculty of Medical Sciences, Lisbon, Portugal. 3. Department of Gastroenterology, Pulido Valente Hospital do Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, Lisbon, Portugal. 4. Curva de Gauss-Research, Training and Consulting, Canas de Senhorim, Portugal.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic management of postcholecystectomy biliary leaks is widely accepted as the treatment of choice. However, refractory biliary leaks after a combination of biliary sphincterotomy and the placement of a large-bore (10F) plastic stent can occur, and the optimal rescue endotherapy for this situation is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical effectiveness of the use of a fully covered self-expandable metal stent (FCSEMS) with the placement of multiple plastic stents (MPS) for the treatment of postcholecystectomy refractory biliary leaks. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Two tertiary-care referral academic centers and one general district hospital. PATIENTS: Forty consecutive patients with refractory biliary leaks who underwent endoscopic management. INTERVENTIONS: Temporary placement of MPS (n = 20) or FCSEMSs (n = 20). MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Clinical outcomes of endotherapy as well as the technical success, adverse events, need for reinterventions, and prognostic factors for clinical success. RESULTS: Endotherapy was possible in all patients. After endotherapy, closure of the leak was accomplished in 13 patients (65%) who received MPS and in 20 patients (100%) who received FCSEMSs (P = .004). The Kaplan-Meier (log-rank) leak-free survival analysis showed a statistically significant difference between the 2 patient populations (χ(2) [1] = 8.30; P < .01) in favor of the FCSEMS group. Use of <3 plastic stents (P = .024), a plastic stent diameter <20F (P = .006), and a high-grade biliary leak (P = .015) were shown to be significant predictors of treatment failure with MPS. The 7 patients in whom placement of MPS failed were retreated with FCSEMSs, resulting in closure of the leaks in all cases. LIMITATIONS: Non-randomized design. CONCLUSION: In our series, the results of the temporary placement of FCSEMSs for postcholecystectomy refractory biliary leaks were superior to those from the use of MPS. A randomized study is needed to confirm our results before further recommendations.
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic management of postcholecystectomy biliary leaks is widely accepted as the treatment of choice. However, refractory biliary leaks after a combination of biliary sphincterotomy and the placement of a large-bore (10F) plastic stent can occur, and the optimal rescue endotherapy for this situation is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical effectiveness of the use of a fully covered self-expandable metal stent (FCSEMS) with the placement of multiple plastic stents (MPS) for the treatment of postcholecystectomy refractory biliary leaks. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Two tertiary-care referral academic centers and one general district hospital. PATIENTS: Forty consecutive patients with refractory biliary leaks who underwent endoscopic management. INTERVENTIONS: Temporary placement of MPS (n = 20) or FCSEMSs (n = 20). MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Clinical outcomes of endotherapy as well as the technical success, adverse events, need for reinterventions, and prognostic factors for clinical success. RESULTS: Endotherapy was possible in all patients. After endotherapy, closure of the leak was accomplished in 13 patients (65%) who received MPS and in 20 patients (100%) who received FCSEMSs (P = .004). The Kaplan-Meier (log-rank) leak-free survival analysis showed a statistically significant difference between the 2 patient populations (χ(2) [1] = 8.30; P < .01) in favor of the FCSEMS group. Use of <3 plastic stents (P = .024), a plastic stent diameter <20F (P = .006), and a high-grade biliary leak (P = .015) were shown to be significant predictors of treatment failure with MPS. The 7 patients in whom placement of MPS failed were retreated with FCSEMSs, resulting in closure of the leaks in all cases. LIMITATIONS: Non-randomized design. CONCLUSION: In our series, the results of the temporary placement of FCSEMSs for postcholecystectomy refractory biliary leaks were superior to those from the use of MPS. A randomized study is needed to confirm our results before further recommendations.
Authors: Nicola de'Angelis; Fausto Catena; Riccardo Memeo; Federico Coccolini; Aleix Martínez-Pérez; Oreste M Romeo; Belinda De Simone; Salomone Di Saverio; Raffaele Brustia; Rami Rhaiem; Tullio Piardi; Maria Conticchio; Francesco Marchegiani; Nassiba Beghdadi; Fikri M Abu-Zidan; Ruslan Alikhanov; Marc-Antoine Allard; Niccolò Allievi; Giuliana Amaddeo; Luca Ansaloni; Roland Andersson; Enrico Andolfi; Mohammad Azfar; Miklosh Bala; Amine Benkabbou; Offir Ben-Ishay; Giorgio Bianchi; Walter L Biffl; Francesco Brunetti; Maria Clotilde Carra; Daniel Casanova; Valerio Celentano; Marco Ceresoli; Osvaldo Chiara; Stefania Cimbanassi; Roberto Bini; Raul Coimbra; Gian Luigi de'Angelis; Francesco Decembrino; Andrea De Palma; Philip R de Reuver; Carlos Domingo; Christian Cotsoglou; Alessandro Ferrero; Gustavo P Fraga; Federica Gaiani; Federico Gheza; Angela Gurrado; Ewen Harrison; Angel Henriquez; Stefan Hofmeyr; Roberta Iadarola; Jeffry L Kashuk; Reza Kianmanesh; Andrew W Kirkpatrick; Yoram Kluger; Filippo Landi; Serena Langella; Real Lapointe; Bertrand Le Roy; Alain Luciani; Fernando Machado; Umberto Maggi; Ronald V Maier; Alain Chichom Mefire; Kazuhiro Hiramatsu; Carlos Ordoñez; Franca Patrizi; Manuel Planells; Andrew B Peitzman; Juan Pekolj; Fabiano Perdigao; Bruno M Pereira; Patrick Pessaux; Michele Pisano; Juan Carlos Puyana; Sandro Rizoli; Luca Portigliotti; Raffaele Romito; Boris Sakakushev; Behnam Sanei; Olivier Scatton; Mario Serradilla-Martin; Anne-Sophie Schneck; Mohammed Lamine Sissoko; Iradj Sobhani; Richard P Ten Broek; Mario Testini; Roberto Valinas; Giorgos Veloudis; Giulio Cesare Vitali; Dieter Weber; Luigi Zorcolo; Felice Giuliante; Paschalis Gavriilidis; David Fuks; Daniele Sommacale Journal: World J Emerg Surg Date: 2021-06-10 Impact factor: 5.469