Literature DB >> 25770984

Incidence, outcomes, and effect on quality of life of cranial nerve injury in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial.

Robert J Hye1, Ariane Mackey2, Michael D Hill3, Jenifer H Voeks4, David J Cohen5, Kaijun Wang5, MeeLee Tom6, Thomas G Brott7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Cranial nerve injury (CNI) is the most common neurologic complication of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and can cause significant chronic disability. Data from prior randomized trials are limited and provide no health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes specific to CNI. Incidence of CNIs and their outcomes for patients in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy vs Stenting Trial (CREST) were examined to identify factors predictive of CNI and their impact on HRQOL.
METHODS: Incidence of CNIs, baseline and procedural characteristics, outcomes, and HRQOL scores were evaluated in the 1151 patients randomized to CEA and undergoing surgery ≤30 days. Patients with CNI were identified and classified using case report forms, adverse event data, and clinical notes. Baseline and procedural characteristics were compared using descriptive statistics. Clinical outcomes at 1 and 12 months were analyzed. All data were adjudicated by two neurologists and a vascular surgeon. HRQOL was evaluated using the Medical Outcomes Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey to assess general health and Likert scales for disease-specific outcomes at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 12 months after CEA. The effect of CNI on SF-36 subscales was evaluated using random effects growth curve models, and Likert scale data were compared by ordinal logistic regression.
RESULTS: CNI was identified in 53 patients (4.6%). Cranial nerves injured were VII (30.2%), XII (24.5%), and IX/X (41.5%), and 3.8% had Horner syndrome. CNI occurred in 52 of 1040 patients (5.0%) receiving general anesthesia and in one of 111 patients (0.9%) operated on under local anesthesia (P = .05). No other predictive baseline or procedural factors were identified. Deficits resolved in 18 patients (34%) at 1 month and in 42 of 52 patients (80.8%) by 1 year. One patient died before the 1-year follow-up visit. The HRQOL evaluation showed no statistical difference between groups with and without CNI at any interval. By Likert scale analysis, the group with CNI showed a significant difference in the difficulty eating/swallowing parameter at 2 and 4 weeks (P < .001) but not at 1 year.
CONCLUSIONS: In CREST, CNI occurred in 4.6% of patients undergoing CEA, with 34% resolution at 30 days and 80.8% at 1 year. The incidence of CNI was significantly higher in patients undergoing general anesthesia. CNI had a small and transient effect on HRQOL, negatively affecting only difficulty eating/swallowing at 2 and 4 weeks but not at 1 year. On the basis of these findings, we conclude that CNI is not a trivial consequence of CEA but rarely results in significant long-term disability.
Copyright © 2015 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25770984      PMCID: PMC4455543          DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.12.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  31 in total

1.  Validity and reliability of the SF-36 Health Survey Questionnaire in patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  I Failde; I Ramos
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Quality of life and cognitive performance after carotid endarterectomy during long-term follow-up.

Authors:  A Sirkka; J P Salenius; R Portin; T Nummenmaa
Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 3.209

3.  Quality of life of 50 carotid endarterectomy survivors: a long-term follow-up study.

Authors:  L Trudel; J Fabia; J P Bouchard
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 3.966

4.  Injury of the peripheral cranial nerves during carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  B Theodotou; M S Mahaley
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1985 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  Cranial and cervical nerve damage associated with carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  T C Dehn; G W Taylor
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Use of the SF36 general health status survey to document health-related quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease: effect of disease and response to coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Authors:  Gary M Kiebzak; Lee M Pierson; Meredith Campbell; Joseph W Cook
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.210

7.  A prospective study of the incidence of injury to the cranial nerves during carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  N R Hertzer; B J Feldman; E G Beven; H M Tucker
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1980-12

8.  Risk of persistent cranial nerve injury after carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Edwin J Cunningham; Rick Bond; Marc R Mayberg; Charles P Warlow; Peter M Rothwell
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Does carotid endarterectomy lead to a decline in cognitive function or health related quality of life?

Authors:  Andrew J Lloyd; Paul D Hayes; Nicholas J M London; Peter R F Bell; A Ross Naylor
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.475

10.  Motor speech deficit following carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  W E Evans; D S Mendelowitz; C Liapis; V Wolfe; C L Florence
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  7 in total

1.  Surgery for posterior fossa meningioma: elevated postoperative cranial nerve morbidity discards aggressive tumor resection policy.

Authors:  Matthias Schneider; Patrick Schuss; Ági Güresir; Valeri Borger; Hartmut Vatter; Erdem Güresir
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  High Mib-1-score correlates with new cranial nerve deficits after surgery for frontal skull base meningioma.

Authors:  Matthias Schneider; Valeri Borger; Ági Güresir; Albert Becker; Hartmut Vatter; Patrick Schuss; Erdem Güresir
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 3.  Trials and Frontiers in Carotid Endarterectomy and Stenting.

Authors:  Douglas W Jones; Thomas G Brott; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Treatment of carotid stenosis in asymptomatic, nonoctogenarian, standard risk patients with stenting versus endarterectomy trials.

Authors:  Jon S Matsumura; Bret M Hanlon; Kenneth Rosenfield; Jenifer H Voeks; George Howard; Gary S Roubin; Thomas G Brott
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 4.860

5.  Factors influencing quality of life in patients followed in the neurosonology laboratory for carotid stenosis.

Authors:  Táňa Fadrná; Zdeňka Mikšová; Roman Herzig; Kateřina Langová; Libor Ličman; David Školoudík
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 3.186

Review 6.  Quality of life after carotid endarterectomy: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Mariusz Chabowski; Anna Grzebien; Agnieszka Ziomek; Karolina Dorobisz; Michał Leśniak; Dariusz Janczak
Journal:  Acta Neurol Belg       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 2.396

7.  Cervical plexus block.

Authors:  Jin-Soo Kim; Justin Sangwook Ko; Seunguk Bang; Hyungtae Kim; Sook Young Lee
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2018-07-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.