Literature DB >> 25770942

Comparisons of two protocols for the early treatment of Class III dentoskeletal disharmony.

Letizia Perillo1, Maddalena Vitale1, Caterina Masucci2, Fabrizia D'Apuzzo1, Paola Cozza3, Lorenzo Franchi4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the short-term outcomes of splints, Class III elastics, and chincup (SEC III) and rapid maxillary expansion and facial mask (RME/FM) protocols.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 25 patients with Class III dentoskeletal disharmony (10 males, 15 females) treated with the SEC III protocol were evaluated at the beginning (T1, mean age 7.5±1.4 years) and at the end of treatment (T2, mean age 8.7±1.4 years). The SEC III group was compared to a matched sample of 32 Class III patients (16 males, 16 females) treated with the RME/FM protocol and to a matched control group (CG) consisting of 23 subjects (12 males, 11 females) with untreated Class III dentoskeletal disharmony. The statistical comparisons between the three groups were performed with analysis of variance with Tukey's post hoc tests.
RESULTS: With respect to the CG the SEC III and the RME/FM groups showed significantly favourable effects in terms of maxillary advancement (SNA +1.2 and +1.4 degrees, respectively), control of mandibular projection (SNB -1.3 and -1.4 degrees, respectively), and intermaxillary relationships (ANB +2.6 and +2.9 degrees, respectively; WITS +3.7 and +2.6mm, respectively). The RME/FM group showed a significantly greater increase in the intermaxillary divergency than the SEC III group (+1.8 degrees) and the CG (+2.0 degrees). LIMITATIONS: A limitation of this study is its short-term nature.
CONCLUSIONS: Both SEC III and RME/FM protocols are efficient treatments for Class III dentoskeletal disharmony. The SEC III protocol produces more favourable control in intermaxillary vertical relationships than the RME/FM therapy.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Orthodontic Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25770942     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjv010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  6 in total

1.  Occlusal plane rotation and orthodontic decompensation: influence on the outcome of surgical correction of class III malocclusion.

Authors:  Elif Dilara Seker; Ezgi Sunal Akturk; Hanife Nuray Yilmaz; Nazan Kucukkeles
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Cephalometric effects of Pushing Splints 3 compared with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy in Class III malocclusion children: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Angela Galeotti; Stefano Martina; Valeria Viarani; Lorenzo Franchi; Roberto Rongo; Vincenzo D'Antò; Paola Festa
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Photogrammetric Comparison of Facial Soft Tissue Profile before and after Protraction Facemask Therapy in Class III Children (6-11 Years Old).

Authors:  Vahid Moshkelgosha; Arghavan Raoof; Ahmadreza Sardarian; Parisa Salehi
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2017-03

4.  Treatment decision in adult patients with class III malocclusion: surgery versus orthodontics.

Authors:  Sara Eslami; Jorge Faber; Ali Fateh; Farnaz Sheikholaemmeh; Vincenzo Grassia; Abdolreza Jamilian
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 2.750

5.  Effectiveness of Tongue Crib Combination Treating Severe Skeletal Angle Class III Malocclusion in Mixed Dentition.

Authors:  Wenting Zhao; Yan Chen; Hee-Moon Kyung; Jin-Shuai Xu
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec

6.  Dentoskeletal effects of early class III treatment protocol based on timing of intervention in children.

Authors:  Ludovica Nucci; Caterina Costanzo; Marco Carfora; Fabrizia d'Apuzzo; Lorenzo Franchi; Letizia Perillo
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 2.750

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.