T M Kearney1, C Donnelly1, J M Kelly1, E P O'Callaghan1, C R Fox1, A T Gavin2. 1. Northern Ireland Cancer Registry, Queens University Belfast, Mulhouse Building, Grosvenor Road, BT12 6DP, UK. 2. Northern Ireland Cancer Registry, Queens University Belfast, Mulhouse Building, Grosvenor Road, BT12 6DP, UK. Electronic address: a.gavin@qub.ac.uk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that inaccuracies in cancer registries are distorting UK survival statistics. This study compared the Northern Ireland Cancer Registry (NICR) database of living patients, with independent data held by Northern Ireland's General Practitioners (GPs) to compare and validate the recorded diagnoses and dates held by the registry. METHODS: All 387 GP practice managers were invited to participate. 100 practices (25.84%) responded. Comparisons were made for 17,102 patients, equivalent to 29.08% of the living patients (58,798) extracted from the NICR between 1993 and 2010. RESULTS: There were no significant differences (p>0.05) between the responding and nonresponding GP patient profiles for age, marital status or deprivation score. However, the responding GPs included more female patients (p=0.02). NICR data accuracy was high, 0.08% of GP cancer patients (n=15) were not included in registry records and 0.02% (n=2) had a diagnosis date which varied more than 2 weeks from GP records (3 weeks and 5 months). The NICR had recorded two different tumour types and three different tumour statuses (benign vs. malignant) to the GPs. CONCLUSION: This comparison demonstrates a high level of accuracy within the NICR and that the survival statistics based on this data can be relied upon.
BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that inaccuracies in cancer registries are distorting UK survival statistics. This study compared the Northern Ireland Cancer Registry (NICR) database of living patients, with independent data held by Northern Ireland's General Practitioners (GPs) to compare and validate the recorded diagnoses and dates held by the registry. METHODS: All 387 GP practice managers were invited to participate. 100 practices (25.84%) responded. Comparisons were made for 17,102 patients, equivalent to 29.08% of the living patients (58,798) extracted from the NICR between 1993 and 2010. RESULTS: There were no significant differences (p>0.05) between the responding and nonresponding GP patient profiles for age, marital status or deprivation score. However, the responding GPs included more female patients (p=0.02). NICR data accuracy was high, 0.08% of GP cancerpatients (n=15) were not included in registry records and 0.02% (n=2) had a diagnosis date which varied more than 2 weeks from GP records (3 weeks and 5 months). The NICR had recorded two different tumour types and three different tumour statuses (benign vs. malignant) to the GPs. CONCLUSION: This comparison demonstrates a high level of accuracy within the NICR and that the survival statistics based on this data can be relied upon.
Authors: Margreet van Putten; Brian T Johnston; Liam J Murray; Anna T Gavin; Damian T McManus; Shivaram Bhat; Richard C Turkington; Helen G Coleman Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2017-10-11 Impact factor: 4.623
Authors: Mark Lawler; Anna Gavin; Manuel Salto-Tellez; Richard D Kennedy; Sandra Van Schaeybroeck; Richard H Wilson; Denis Paul Harkin; Margaret Grayson; Ruth E Boyd; Peter W Hamilton; Darragh G McArt; Jacqueline James; Tracy Robson; Robert D Ladner; Kevin M Prise; Joe M O'Sullivan; Timothy Harrison; Liam Murray; Patrick G Johnston; David J Waugh Journal: Cancer Date: 2015-12-22 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Conan Donnelly; Nigel Hart; Alan David McCrorie; Michael Donnelly; Lesley Anderson; Lisa Ranaghan; Anna Gavin Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-06-19 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Anya Burton; Daniela Tataru; Robert J Driver; Thomas G Bird; Dyfed Huws; David Wallace; Timothy J S Cross; Ian A Rowe; Graeme Alexander; Aileen Marshall Journal: JHEP Rep Date: 2021-01-19
Authors: Ashleigh C Hamilton; David W Donnelly; Maurice B Loughrey; Richard C Turkington; Colin Fox; Deirdre Fitzpatrick; Ciaran E O'Neill; Anna T Gavin; Helen G Coleman Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2021-07-01 Impact factor: 9.075
Authors: Samuel William David Merriel; Emma L Turner; Eleanor Walsh; Grace J Young; Chris Metcalfe; Luke Hounsome; Isobel Tudge; Jenny Donovan; Freddie Hamdy; David Neal; Richard M Martin Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-11-14 Impact factor: 2.692