Literature DB >> 25770400

Opportunity to increase life span in narrow QRS cardiac resynchronization therapy recipients by deactivating ventricular pacing: evidence from randomized controlled trials.

S M Afzal Sohaib1, Judith A Finegold1, Sukhjinder S Nijjer1, Ruhella Hossain1, Cecilia Linde2, Wayne C Levy3, Richard Sutton1, Prapa Kanagaratnam1, Darrel P Francis4, Zachary I Whinnett1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the time course of clinical events in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) trials.
BACKGROUND: Recent randomized controlled trial results suggest that in heart failure with narrow QRS, biventricular pacing (CRT) may increase mortality. The authors proposed implant complications as the cause, rather than a progressive adverse physiological effect.
METHODS: The study identified all trials comparing CRT with no CRT, which reported Kaplan-Meier curves in groups defined by QRS: narrow, non-left bundle branch block (LBBB) broad, and LBBB broad. For each trial, the change in life span every 3 months up to 3.5 years (the longest time for which data are available) was calculated and a power law was fitted, that is, ∝ time(n).
RESULTS: Four trials (MADIT-CRT [Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy], RAFT [Resynchronization-Defibrillation for Ambulatory Heart Failure Trial], REVERSE [REsynchronization reVErses Remodeling in Systolic left vEntricular dysfunction], and EchoCRT [Echocardiography Guided Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy]), totaling 4,717 patients, reported curves for mortality or heart failure-related hospitalization, or for mortality. In patients with LBBB broad QRS (within MADIT-CRT), life span gain increased in proportion to time(1.94). In contrast, in patients with non-LBBB broad QRS (within MADIT-CRT) and patients with narrow QRS (EchoCRT), life span was lost in proportion to time(1.92) and time,(1.96) respectively. Hospitalization-free survival showed similar patterns.
CONCLUSIONS: The nonlinear growth of life span gained when a CRT device is implanted in patients with LBBB broad QRS is unfortunately mirrored by a similarly progressive loss in life span in narrow QRS heart failure. This suggests the culprit is a progressive physiological effect of pacing rather than implant complications. If these data are not sufficient, a randomized controlled trial of deactivating CRT in patients with narrow QRS may now be needed, with a primary endpoint of increasing survival.
Copyright © 2015 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  QRS morphology; cardiac resynchronization therapy; heart failure; survival

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25770400     DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2014.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Heart Fail        ISSN: 2213-1779            Impact factor:   12.035


  7 in total

Review 1.  [Current impact of cardiac implantable electronic devices].

Authors:  J Kuschyk; B Rudic; M Borggrefe; I Akin
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.443

2.  Early prediction of cardiac resynchronization therapy response by non-invasive electrocardiogram markers.

Authors:  Nuria Ortigosa; Víctor Pérez-Roselló; Víctor Donoso; Joaquín Osca; Luis Martínez-Dolz; Carmen Fernández; Antonio Galbis
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 3.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients: tough road but clear future.

Authors:  Ziyu Wang; Yongquan Wu; Junmeng Zhang
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 4.214

4.  What is the most appropriate method for coronary sinus cannulation? The telescopic method or the electrophysiologic method?

Authors:  Hakan Gunes; Ekrem Aksu; Huseyin Nacar; Murat Kerkutluoglu; Handan Gunes; Sami Ozgul
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Renal denervation in patients with symptomatic chronic heart failure despite resynchronization therapy - a pilot study.

Authors:  Tomasz Drożdż; Marek Jastrzębski; Paweł Moskal; Aleksander Kusiak; Agnieszka Bednarek; Katarzyna Styczkiewicz; Piotr Jankowski; Danuta Czarnecka
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 1.426

6.  Prognostication of Poor Survival After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Authors:  Paulius Bašinskas; Neris Stoškutė; Austėja Gerulytė; Agnė Abramavičiūtė; Aras Puodžiukynas; Tomas Kazakevičius
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-01-04       Impact factor: 2.430

7.  Novel active fixation lead guided by electrical delay can improve response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure.

Authors:  Matteo Casale; Maurizio Mezzetti; Marianna Gigliotti De Fazio; Loredana Caccamo; Paolo Busacca; Giuseppe Dattilo
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2021-12-24
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.