Literature DB >> 25770194

Refining the phenotype of Unverricht-Lundborg disease (EPM1): a population-wide Finnish study.

Jelena Hyppönen1, Marja Äikiä2, Tarja Joensuu2, Petro Julkunen2, Nils Danner2, Päivi Koskenkorva2, Ritva Vanninen2, Anna-Elina Lehesjoki2, Esa Mervaala2, Reetta Kälviäinen2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This Finnish nationwide study aimed to refine the clinical phenotype variability and to identify factors that could explain the extensive variability in the clinical severity of the symptoms observed among patients with Unverricht-Lundborg disease (progressive myoclonus epilepsy type 1 [EPM1]) homozygous for the dodecamer expansion mutation in the cystatin B (CSTB) gene.
METHODS: The study population consisted of 66 (33 men and 33 women) patients with genetically confirmed EPM1 homozygous for the CSTB expansion mutation for whom the sizes of the expanded alleles were determined. The clinical evaluation included videorecorded Unified Myoclonus Rating Scale and retrospectively collected medical history. The navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation test was used to determine motor threshold (MT) and silent period (SP) of the motor cortex.
RESULTS: An earlier age at onset for EPM1 and longer disease duration were associated with more severe action myoclonus, lower performance IQ, increased MT, and prolonged SP. The number of dodecamer repeats in CSTB alleles varied between 38 and 77. On average, the size of the longer expanded alleles of patients was independently associated with MT, but exerted only a modulating effect on age at onset, myoclonus severity, and SP.
CONCLUSIONS: As a group, earlier disease onset and longer duration are associated with more severe phenotype. Even though the vast majority of patients with EPM1 have a uniform genetic mutation, the actual size of the longer CSTB expansion mutation allele is likely to have a modulating effect on the age at disease onset, myoclonus severity, and cortical neurophysiology.
© 2015 American Academy of Neurology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25770194     DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001466

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN: 0028-3878            Impact factor:   9.910


  7 in total

1.  Has Progress Been Made in Progressive Myoclonic Epilepsy (EPM1)?

Authors:  M Scott Perry
Journal:  Epilepsy Curr       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 7.500

Review 2.  On the wrong DNA track: Molecular mechanisms of repeat-mediated genome instability.

Authors:  Alexandra N Khristich; Sergei M Mirkin
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 3.  Drug Treatment of Progressive Myoclonic Epilepsy.

Authors:  Gregory L Holmes
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 4.  Update on Pharmacological Treatment of Progressive Myoclonus Epilepsies.

Authors:  Edoardo Ferlazzo; Dorothee Kasteleijn-Nolst Trenite; Gerrit-Jan de Haan; Felix Felix Nitschke; Saija Ahonen; Sara Gasparini; Berge A Minassian
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 3.116

5.  First Molecular Diagnosis of a Patient with Unverricht-Lundborg Disease in Korea.

Authors:  Ki Hoon Kim; Ju Sun Song; Chan Wook Park; Chang Seok Ki; Kyoung Heo
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.759

Review 6.  Cognitive Dysfunction in Repeat Expansion Diseases: A Review.

Authors:  Sizhe Zhang; Lu Shen; Bin Jiao
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 5.750

Review 7.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation as a tool to understand genetic conditions associated with epilepsy.

Authors:  Katri Silvennoinen; Simona Balestrini; John C Rothwell; Sanjay M Sisodiya
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 6.740

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.