Mirko Faber1, Susanne Schink2, Anne Mayer-Scholl3, Christoph Ziesch4, Ralph Schönfelder5, Heidi Wichmann-Schauer3, Klaus Stark1, Karsten Nöckler3. 1. Department for Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany. 2. Department for Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany Postgraduate Training for Applied Epidemiology (PAE), affiliated to the European Programme for Intervention Epidemiology Training (EPIET), ECDC, Sweden. 3. Department for Biological Safety, Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Berlin. 4. Public Health Department, Görlitz Administrative District. 5. Food Inspection and Veterinary Department, Görlitz Administrative District, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Food safety authorities discovered that wild boar meat products contaminated with Trichinella spiralis had entered the food chain in Germany in March 2013. Public health authorities issued guidelines for health professionals including post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) using mebendazole and advised the public to seek medical advice if exposed. Our objective was to identify factors associated with the development of trichinellosis and to evaluate post exposure prophylaxis. METHODS: Persons who reported to local public health departments as exposed were interviewed concerning exposure, symptoms, and medication. Serum samples were tested by an in-house Trichinella-specific enzyme-linked innunosorbent assay. Cases were defined as persons presenting with myalgia and/or periorbital edema and Trichinella-specific immunoglobulin M and immunoglobulin G antibodies after exposure to implicated products. RESULTS: Of 101 persons interviewed, 71 were exposed and serologically tested. Antibodies were detected in 21/71 (30%) and 14/71 (20%) met the case definition. Attack rates were positively correlated to the amount of implicated product consumed. Among n = 37 persons who received anthelmintics as PEP, 6 persons developed trichinellosis. These cases exclusively occurred among persons starting PEP 6 days or later post-exposure. Exposure to implicated products and delaying PEP were also significantly associated with developing trichinellosis (P < .01) in a multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Concerted efforts by food safety and public health authorities lead to timely outbreak control and facilitated the provision of early PEP. PEP appears to be effective in preventing trichinellosis when given early, preferably within 6 days. We therefore recommend initiating PEP without delay in similar settings and encourage public health professionals to fast-track this intervention.
BACKGROUND: Food safety authorities discovered that wild boar meat products contaminated with Trichinella spiralis had entered the food chain in Germany in March 2013. Public health authorities issued guidelines for health professionals including post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) using mebendazole and advised the public to seek medical advice if exposed. Our objective was to identify factors associated with the development of trichinellosis and to evaluate post exposure prophylaxis. METHODS:Persons who reported to local public health departments as exposed were interviewed concerning exposure, symptoms, and medication. Serum samples were tested by an in-house Trichinella-specific enzyme-linked innunosorbent assay. Cases were defined as persons presenting with myalgia and/or periorbital edema and Trichinella-specific immunoglobulin M and immunoglobulin G antibodies after exposure to implicated products. RESULTS: Of 101 persons interviewed, 71 were exposed and serologically tested. Antibodies were detected in 21/71 (30%) and 14/71 (20%) met the case definition. Attack rates were positively correlated to the amount of implicated product consumed. Among n = 37 persons who received anthelmintics as PEP, 6 persons developed trichinellosis. These cases exclusively occurred among persons starting PEP 6 days or later post-exposure. Exposure to implicated products and delaying PEP were also significantly associated with developing trichinellosis (P < .01) in a multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Concerted efforts by food safety and public health authorities lead to timely outbreak control and facilitated the provision of early PEP. PEP appears to be effective in preventing trichinellosis when given early, preferably within 6 days. We therefore recommend initiating PEP without delay in similar settings and encourage public health professionals to fast-track this intervention.
Authors: Antonio Ortega-Pacheco; Juan F J Torres-Acosta; Alejandro Alzina-López; Eduardo Gutiérrez-Blanco; Manuel E Bolio-González; Armando J Aguilar-Caballero; Roger I Rodríguez-Vivas; Edwin Gutiérrez-Ruiz; Karla Y Acosta-Viana; Eugenia Guzmán-Marín; Alberto Rosado-Aguilar; Matilde Jiménez-Coello Journal: J Trop Med Date: 2015-12-07
Authors: Peter Messiaen; Annemie Forier; Steven Vanderschueren; Caroline Theunissen; Jochen Nijs; Marjan Van Esbroeck; Emmanuel Bottieau; Koen De Schrijver; Inge C Gyssens; Reinoud Cartuyvels; Pierre Dorny; Jeroen van der Hilst; Daniel Blockmans Journal: Euro Surveill Date: 2016-09-15
Authors: Marcos de Almeida; Henry Bishop; Fernanda S Nascimento; Blaine Mathison; Richard S Bradbury; Alexandre da Silva Journal: Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz Date: 2018-10-29 Impact factor: 2.743