Literature DB >> 25769945

Suction power output and the inertial cost of rotating the neurocranium to generate suction in fish.

Sam Van Wassenbergh1, Steven W Day2, L Patricia Hernández3, Timothy E Higham4, Tyler Skorczewski5.   

Abstract

To expand the buccal cavity, many suction-feeding fishes rely on a considerable contribution from dorsal rotation of the dorsal part of the head including the brains, eyes, and several bones forming the braincase and skull roof (jointly referred to as the neurocranium). As the neurocranium takes up a large part of the total mass of the head, this rotation may incur a considerable inertial cost. If so, this would suggest a significant selective pressure on the kinematics and mass distribution of the neurocranium of suction feeders. Here, an inverse dynamic model is formulated to calculate the instantaneous power required to rotate the neurocranium, approximated by a quarter ellipsoid volume of homogeneous density, as well as to calculate the instantaneous suction power based on intra-oral pressure and head volume quantifications. We applied this model to largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) and found that the power required to rotate the neurocranium accounts for only about 4% of the power required to suck water into the mouth. Furthermore, recovery of kinetic energy from the rotating neurocranium converted into suction work may be possible during the phase of neurocranial deceleration. Thus, we suggest that only a negligible proportion of the power output of the feeding muscles is lost as inertial costs in the largemouth bass. Consequently, the feeding performance of piscivorous suction feeders with generalised morphology, comparable to our model species, is not limited by neurocranial motion during head expansion. This suggests that it is thus not likely to be a factor of importance in the evolution of cranial shape and size.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanics; Cranium; Inverse dynamics; Prey capture

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25769945     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2015.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  9 in total

1.  Swimming muscles power suction feeding in largemouth bass.

Authors:  Ariel L Camp; Thomas J Roberts; Elizabeth L Brainerd
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Speciation through the lens of biomechanics: locomotion, prey capture and reproductive isolation.

Authors:  Timothy E Higham; Sean M Rogers; R Brian Langerhans; Heather A Jamniczky; George V Lauder; William J Stewart; Christopher H Martin; David N Reznick
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Keels of boxfish carapaces strongly improve stabilization against roll.

Authors:  Merel J W Van Gorp; Jana Goyens; Michael E Alfaro; Sam Van Wassenbergh
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 4.293

4.  Axial morphology and 3D neurocranial kinematics in suction-feeding fishes.

Authors:  Yordano E Jimenez; Ariel L Camp; Jonathan D Grindall; Elizabeth L Brainerd
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 2.422

5.  Bifunctional Role of the Sternohyoideus Muscle During Suction Feeding in Striped Surfperch, Embiotoca lateralis.

Authors:  J J Lomax; T F Martinson; Y E Jimenez; E L Brainerd
Journal:  Integr Org Biol       Date:  2020-07-29

6.  Fishes can use axial muscles as anchors or motors for powerful suction feeding.

Authors:  Ariel L Camp; Aaron M Olsen; L Patricia Hernandez; Elizabeth L Brainerd
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Extreme Morphology, Functional Trade-offs, and Evolutionary Dynamics in a Clade of Open-Ocean Fishes (Perciformes: Bramidae).

Authors:  Michelle C Gilbert; Andrew J Conith; Catherine S Lerose; Joshua K Moyer; Steve H Huskey; R Craig Albertson
Journal:  Integr Org Biol       Date:  2021-02-16

8.  Increasing morphological disparity and decreasing optimality for jaw speed and strength during the radiation of jawed vertebrates.

Authors:  William J Deakin; Philip S L Anderson; Wendy den Boer; Thomas J Smith; Jennifer J Hill; Martin Rücklin; Philip C J Donoghue; Emily J Rayfield
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 14.136

9.  A new conceptual framework for the musculoskeletal biomechanics and physiology of ray-finned fishes.

Authors:  Ariel L Camp; Elizabeth L Brainerd
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 3.312

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.