Rajan Veeratterapillay1, Luke Teo2, Susan Asterling2, Damian Greene2. 1. Department of Urology, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, United Kingdom. Electronic address: veeratterapillayr@doctors.org.uk. 2. Department of Urology, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, United Kingdom.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To report contemporary treatment outcomes of penile squamous cell carcinoma at a UK supraregional center, including patterns of therapy, oncologic results, and long-term survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with squamous cell carcinoma treated during the period January 2000 to January 2011 were included. Records were reviewed to identify the mode of therapy (penile preserving or amputative surgery), pathology reports (reclassified according to the 2009 tumor-nodes-metastasis classification), recurrence patterns, and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Kaplan-Meier plots were used for survival analyses. RESULTS: Two hundred three patients were identified with a median follow-up of 61 months. At presentation, 165 patients (82%) were node negative, 31 (15%) were node positive, and 7 (3%) had metastatic disease. Management was penile preserving surgery (n = 99, 49%), partial penectomy (n = 49, 24%), radical penectomy (n = 48, 24%), and chemotherapy or radiotherapy for metastatic disease (n = 7, 3%). After organ-preserving surgery, the local recurrence rate was 18% (compared with 4% for amputative surgery), with 94% of recurrences occurring within 3 years. Histopathologic staging was as follows, with pTis (20%), pT1 (27%), pT2 (27%), pT3 (7%), and pT4 (1%). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a 5-year CSS of 85% and a 10-year CSS of 81%. Five-year CSS was noted to decrease with advancing stage with pN0 tumors (92%), N1 (73%), N2 (61%), N3 (33%), and M1 (0%; P <.0001). CONCLUSION: Supraregional penile cancer management has led to considerable clinical experience in our center over the past decade. Close follow-up is vital to pick up local recurrence after penile-preserving surgery. Overall oncologic outcomes are good with a 5-year CSS of 85%.
OBJECTIVE: To report contemporary treatment outcomes of penile squamous cell carcinoma at a UK supraregional center, including patterns of therapy, oncologic results, and long-term survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with squamous cell carcinoma treated during the period January 2000 to January 2011 were included. Records were reviewed to identify the mode of therapy (penile preserving or amputative surgery), pathology reports (reclassified according to the 2009 tumor-nodes-metastasis classification), recurrence patterns, and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Kaplan-Meier plots were used for survival analyses. RESULTS: Two hundred three patients were identified with a median follow-up of 61 months. At presentation, 165 patients (82%) were node negative, 31 (15%) were node positive, and 7 (3%) had metastatic disease. Management was penile preserving surgery (n = 99, 49%), partial penectomy (n = 49, 24%), radical penectomy (n = 48, 24%), and chemotherapy or radiotherapy for metastatic disease (n = 7, 3%). After organ-preserving surgery, the local recurrence rate was 18% (compared with 4% for amputative surgery), with 94% of recurrences occurring within 3 years. Histopathologic staging was as follows, with pTis (20%), pT1 (27%), pT2 (27%), pT3 (7%), and pT4 (1%). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a 5-year CSS of 85% and a 10-year CSS of 81%. Five-year CSS was noted to decrease with advancing stage with pN0 tumors (92%), N1 (73%), N2 (61%), N3 (33%), and M1 (0%; P <.0001). CONCLUSION: Supraregional penile cancer management has led to considerable clinical experience in our center over the past decade. Close follow-up is vital to pick up local recurrence after penile-preserving surgery. Overall oncologic outcomes are good with a 5-year CSS of 85%.
Authors: Vasileios I Sakalis; Riccardo Campi; Lenka Barreto; Herney Garcia Perdomo; Isabella Greco; Łukasz Zapala; Mithun Kailavasan; Tiago Antunes-Lopes; Jack David Marcus; Kenneth Manzie; John Osborne; Benjamin Ayres; Luc M F Moonen; Andrea Necchi; Juanita Crook; Pedro Oliveira; Lance C Pagliaro; Chris Protzel; Arie S Parnham; Maarten Albersen; Curtis A Pettaway; Philippe E Spiess; Scott T Tagawa; R Bryan Rumble; Oscar R Brouwer Journal: Eur Urol Open Sci Date: 2022-05-02
Authors: Ahmet Murat Aydin; Jad Chahoud; Jacob J Adashek; Mounsif Azizi; Anthony Magliocco; Jeffrey S Ross; Andrea Necchi; Philippe E Spiess Journal: Nat Rev Urol Date: 2020-08-18 Impact factor: 14.432
Authors: Andrey Soares; Icaro Thiago de Carvalho; Aluízio Gonçalves da Fonseca; Antonio Machado Alencar; Carlos Heli Bezerra Leite; Diogo Assed Bastos; João Paulo Holanda Soares; Katia Ramos Moreira Leite; Mário Ronalsa Brandão Filho; Ronald Wagner Pereira Coelho; Sandro Roberto de A Cavallero; Stênio de Cassio Zequi; José de Ribamar Rodrigues Calixto Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2020-10-26 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Demis N Lipe; Phillip B Mann; Rodrick Babakhanlou; Maria T Cruz Carreras; A Guido Hita; Monica K Wattana Journal: Emerg Med Int Date: 2021-07-27 Impact factor: 1.112