Literature DB >> 25769683

Success criteria for electronic medical record implementations in low-resource settings: a systematic review.

Fleur Fritz1, Binyam Tilahun2, Martin Dugas2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Electronic medical record (EMR) systems have the potential of supporting clinical work by providing the right information at the right time to the right people and thus make efficient use of resources. This is especially important in low-resource settings where reliable data are also needed to support public health and local supporting organizations. In this systematic literature review, our objectives are to identify and collect literature about success criteria of EMR implementations in low-resource settings and to summarize them into recommendations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our search strategy relied on PubMed queries and manual bibliography reviews. Studies were included if EMR implementations in low-resource settings were described. The extracted success criteria and measurements were summarized into 7 categories: ethical, financial, functionality, organizational, political, technical, and training.
RESULTS: We collected 381 success criteria with 229 measurements from 47 articles out of 223 articles. Most papers were evaluations or lessons learned from African countries, published from 1999 to 2013. Almost half of the EMR systems served a specific disease area like human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The majority of criteria that were reported dealt with the functionality, followed by organizational issues, and technical infrastructures. Sufficient training and skilled personnel were mentioned in roughly 10%. Political, ethical, and financial considerations did not play a predominant role. More evaluations based on reliable frameworks are needed.
CONCLUSIONS: Highly reliable data handling methods, human resources and effective project management, as well as technical architecture and infrastructure are all key factors for successful EMR implementation.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electronic medical record; hospital information system; implementation; low-resource setting; success criteria

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25769683     DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocu038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  36 in total

1.  Scaling-up health information systems to improve HIV treatment: An assessment of initial patient monitoring systems in Mozambique.

Authors:  Mindy Hochgesang; Sophia Zamudio-Haas; Lissa Moran; Leopoldo Nhampossa; Laura Packel; Hannah Leslie; Janise Richards; Starley B Shade
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 4.046

2.  Development and Usability of a Smartphone Application for Tracking Oncology Patients in Gaborone, Botswana.

Authors:  Surbhi Grover; Sidrah Shah; Rohini Bhatia; Sandra Urusaro; Barati Monare; Tlotlo Ralefala; Alexander Seiphetlheng; Sherman Preet Singh; Givy Dhaliwal
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 2.176

3.  Digital ≠ paperless: novel interfaces needed to address global health challenges.

Authors:  Pratap Kumar; Stephen M Sammut; Jason J Madan; Sherri Bucher; Meghan Bruce Kumar
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2021-04

4.  Sustainability of health information systems: a three-country qualitative study in southern Africa.

Authors:  Corrina Moucheraud; Amee Schwitters; Chantelle Boudreaux; Denise Giles; Peter H Kilmarx; Ntolo Ntolo; Zwashe Bangani; Michael E St Louis; Thomas J Bossert
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 5.  Open-Source Electronic Health Record Systems for Low-Resource Settings: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Assel Syzdykova; André Malta; Maria Zolfo; Ermias Diro; José Luis Oliveira
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2017-11-13

6.  I've got 99 problems but a phone ain't one: Electronic and mobile health in low and middle income countries.

Authors:  Pratap Kumar; Chris Paton; Doris Kirigia
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 3.791

7.  Modeling antecedents of electronic medical record system implementation success in low-resource setting hospitals.

Authors:  Binyam Tilahun; Fleur Fritz
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 8.  Benefits and challenges of EMR implementations in low resource settings: a state-of-the-art review.

Authors:  Badeia Jawhari; Dave Ludwick; Louanne Keenan; David Zakus; Robert Hayward
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 2.796

9.  Imputing HIV treatment start dates from routine laboratory data in South Africa: a validation study.

Authors:  Mhairi Maskew; Jacob Bor; Cheryl Hendrickson; William MacLeod; Till Bärnighausen; Deenan Pillay; Ian Sanne; Sergio Carmona; Wendy Stevens; Matthew P Fox
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 2.908

10.  Rubber stamp templates for improving clinical documentation: A paper-based, m-Health approach for quality improvement in low-resource settings.

Authors:  Bernadette Kleczka; Anita Musiega; Grace Rabut; Phoebe Wekesa; Paul Mwaniki; Michael Marx; Pratap Kumar
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 4.046

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.