Literature DB >> 25769500

Health care use amongst online buyers of medications and vitamins.

Karishma Desai1, Betty Chewning2, David Mott3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With increased use of the internet, more people access medications and health supplements online. However little is known about factors associated with using online buying. Given the variable quality of online pharmacies, an important question is whether online consumers also have health care providers with whom they discuss internet information and decisions.
OBJECTIVES: To help address these gaps this study used the Andersen Model to explore (1) the characteristics of internet buyers of medicines and/vitamins, (2) the association between health care use and buying medicines and/vitamins online drawing on the Andersen health care utilization framework, and (3) factors predicting discussion of internet information with health providers.
METHODS: The National Cancer Institute's Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) 2007 was analyzed to study online medication buying among a national sample of internet users (N = 5074). The Andersen Model of health care utilization guided the study's variable selection and analyses. Buying online and talking about online information are the two main outcome variables. Separate multivariate logistic regression analyses identified factors associated with online buying and factors predicting discussions with providers about online information.
RESULTS: In 2007, 14.5% (n = 871) of internet users bought a medication or vitamin online. About 85% of online buyers had a regular provider, but only 39% talked to the provider about online information even though most (93.7%) visited the provider ≥1 times/year. Multivariate analyses found internet health product consumers were more likely to be over 50 years old, have insurance and discuss the internet with their provider than non-internet health product consumers. Moreover, discussion of internet information was more likely if consumers had a regular provider and perceived their communication to be at least fair or good in general.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a clear association of online buying with age, frequency of visits and discussing online information with a provider. Although most online buyers visited a provider in the prior year, only a minority discussed the internet with them. This suggests a missed opportunity for providers to help patients navigate internet buying, particularly if they are a patient's regular provider and the patient perceives their communication as good. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HINTS; Health services; Internet information; Internet medicines; Online pharmacies; Patient-provider communication

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25769500     DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2015.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm        ISSN: 1551-7411


  8 in total

1.  The Patient-Provider Relationship: Predictors of black/African American Cancer Patients' Perceived Quality of Care and Health Outcomes.

Authors:  Matthew Asare; Christina Fakhoury; Nealey Thompson; Eva Culakova; Amber S Kleckner; Georges Adunlin; Karen Reifenstein; Gabriel A Benavidez; Charles S Kamen
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2019-06-05

2.  3D-printed electrochemical pestle and mortar for identification of falsified pharmaceutical tablets.

Authors:  Ricoveer S Shergill; Anna Farlow; Fernando Perez; Bhavik A Patel
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2022-02-12       Impact factor: 5.833

3.  Exploring Consumer and Patient Knowledge, Behavior, and Attitude Toward Medicinal and Lifestyle Products Purchased From the Internet: A Web-Based Survey.

Authors:  Sulaf Assi; Mohamed Haffar; David Osselton; Jordan Thomas
Journal:  JMIR Public Health Surveill       Date:  2016-07-18

4.  Consumers Turning to the Internet Pharmacy Market: Cross-Sectional Study on the Frequency and Attitudes of Hungarian Patients Purchasing Medications Online.

Authors:  András Fittler; Róbert György Vida; Mátyás Káplár; Lajos Botz
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  Disclosure of complementary medicine use to medical providers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  H Foley; A Steel; H Cramer; J Wardle; J Adams
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Trends and Characteristics of the US Adult Population's Behavioral Patterns in Web-Based Prescription Filling: National Survey Study.

Authors:  Lin-Ya Yang; Jennifer G Lyons; Steven R Erickson; Chung-Hsuen Wu
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Online medication purchasing during the Covid-19 pandemic: potential risks to patient safety and the urgent need to develop more rigorous controls for purchasing online medications, a pilot study from the United Arab Emirates.

Authors:  Ammar Abdulrahman Jairoun; Sabaa Saleh Al-Hemyari; Naseem Mohammed Abdulla; Faris El-Dahiyat; Maimona Jairoun; Saleh Karamah Al-Tamimi; Zaheer-Ud-Din Babar
Journal:  J Pharm Policy Pract       Date:  2021-04-30

8.  Social and Demographic Patterns of Health-Related Internet Use Among Adults in the United States: A Secondary Data Analysis of the Health Information National Trends Survey.

Authors:  Rose Calixte; Argelis Rivera; Olutobi Oridota; William Beauchamp; Marlene Camacho-Rivera
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-19       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.