Literature DB >> 25768027

Comparison of Postoperative Pain after Different Thoracic Surgery Approaches as Measured by Electrical Stimulation.

Norifumi Tsubokawa1, Hiroaki Harada1, Chie Takenaka1, Keizo Misumi1, Yoshinori Yamashita1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pain is commonly evaluated using the numerous rating scale (NRS), visual analogue scale, or pain scale; however, these assessments are easily affected by various subjective factors. We measured the degree of postoperative chest pain among different thoracic surgery approaches using NRS and electrical stimulation measurements.
METHODS: Seventy patients who underwent lobectomy or segmentectomy were enrolled. Concomitant with NRS, pain scores were quantitatively measured on postoperative day 2 using an electrical neurostimulator to compare the degree of pain among three different surgical approaches: pure video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS), hybrid VATS, and conventional thoracotomy. The risk factors associated with postoperative pain were also analyzed.
RESULTS: Thirty patients underwent lung resection with pure VATS, while 30 had hybrid VATS, and 10 had conventional thoracotomy. Among the three surgical approaches, analyzing the pain score indicated statistically significant differences (pure, 159.50 ± 26.22; hybrid, 269.36 ± 30.49; thoracotomy, 589.40 ± 141.11; p = 0.003); however, NRS did not obtain a statistically significant difference between the three approaches (pure, 4.26 ± 0.27; hybrid, 4.96 ± 0.30; thoracotomy, 5.50 ± 0.68; p = 0.105). A multivariate analysis showed that the surgical approach was an independent risk factor for postoperative pain as determined by the pain score (pure vs. hybrid, p = 0.076; pure vs. thoracotomy, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: For lung surgery, the differences in surgical approach were an independent risk factor for postoperative pain. In the early postoperative period, pure VATS was shown to be the least painful of the three surgical approaches. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25768027     DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1546427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0171-6425            Impact factor:   1.827


  8 in total

1.  Response to "VATS vs. thoracotomy regarding postoperative chronic pain".

Authors:  Emine Ozgur Bayman; Kalpaj R Parekh; John Keech; Timothy J Brennan
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Video assisted thoracic surgery vs. thoracotomy regarding postoperative chronic pain.

Authors:  Aris Koryllos; Erich Stoelben
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Why perform uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery?-multiple considerations.

Authors:  Antonio E Martin-Ucar; Laura Socci
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2016-06-21

Review 4.  VATS segmentectomy: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Seshiru Nakazawa; Kimihiro Shimizu; Akira Mogi; Hiroyuki Kuwano
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-12-18

5.  Robot-assisted thoracic surgery versus video-assisted thoracic surgery for lung lobectomy or segmentectomy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jianglei Ma; Xiaoyao Li; Shifu Zhao; Jiawei Wang; Wujia Zhang; Guangyuan Sun
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Continuous surgical multi-level extrapleural block for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a retrospective study assessing its efficacy as pain relief following lobectomy and wedge resection.

Authors:  Mark Larsson; Anders Öwall; Ulrik Sartipy; Anders Franco-Cereceda; Barbro Johansson; Jan G Jakobsson
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-11-12

7.  Bronchial Sleeve Resection with Complete Pulmonary Preservation: A Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Jiangnan Duan; Haomin Cai; Wei Huang; Lin Lin; Liang Wu; Jiang Fan
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 3.989

8.  Incidence and risk factors of unplanned emergency department visits following thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Merel H J Hazewinkel; Remco R Berendsen; Rik C J van Klink; Hans Dik; Jeroen Wink; Jerry Braun; Robert A F de Lind van Wijngaarden
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2021-08-21
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.