Kristin Mattocks1, Aimee Kroll-Desrosiers, Laurie Zephyrin, Jodie Katon, Julie Weitlauf, Lori Bastian, Sally Haskell, Cynthia Brandt. 1. *VA Central Western Massachusetts Healthcare System, Leeds †Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School ‡Clinical and Population Health Research Program, Worcester, MA §Reproductive Health for the Women Veteran's Health Strategic Healthcare Group, VA Central Office, Washington, DC ∥VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA ¶VA Office of Patient Services, Office of Women's Health, Washington, DC #University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA **VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto ††Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA ‡‡Department of Medicine, University of Connecticut, Mansfield §§VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT ∥∥Comprehensive Women's Health, VHA, Washington, DC ¶¶Yale University School of Medicine ##VA Connecticut ***Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: An increasing number of young women Veterans seek reproductive health care through the VA, yet little is known regarding the provision of infertility care for this population. The VA provides a range of infertility services for Veterans including artificial insemination, but does not provide in vitro fertilization. This study will be the first to characterize infertility care among OEF/OIF/OND women Veterans using VA care. METHODS: We analyzed data from the OEF/OIF/OND roster file from the Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC)-Contingency Tracking System Deployment file of military discharges from October 1, 2001-December 30, 2010, which includes 68,442 women Veterans between the ages of 18 and 45 who utilized VA health care after separating from military service. We examined the receipt of infertility diagnoses and care using ICD-9 and CPT codes. RESULTS: Less than 2% (n=1323) of OEF/OIF/OND women Veterans received an infertility diagnosis during the study period. Compared with women VA users without infertility diagnosis, those with infertility diagnosis were younger, obese, black, or Hispanic, have a service-connected disability rating, a positive screen for military sexual trauma, and a mental health diagnosis. Overall, 22% of women with an infertility diagnosis received an infertility assessment or treatment. Thirty-nine percent of women Veterans receiving infertility assessment or treatment received this care from non-VA providers. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, a small proportion of OEF/OIF/OND women Veterans received infertility diagnoses from the VA during the study period, and an even smaller proportion received infertility treatment. Nearly 40% of those who received infertility treatments received these treatments from non-VA providers, indicating that the VA may need to examine the training and resources needed to provide this care within the VA. Understanding women's use of VA infertility services is an important component of understanding VA's commitment to comprehensive medical care for women Veterans.
BACKGROUND: An increasing number of young women Veterans seek reproductive health care through the VA, yet little is known regarding the provision of infertility care for this population. The VA provides a range of infertility services for Veterans including artificial insemination, but does not provide in vitro fertilization. This study will be the first to characterize infertility care among OEF/OIF/OND women Veterans using VA care. METHODS: We analyzed data from the OEF/OIF/OND roster file from the Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC)-Contingency Tracking System Deployment file of military discharges from October 1, 2001-December 30, 2010, which includes 68,442 women Veterans between the ages of 18 and 45 who utilized VA health care after separating from military service. We examined the receipt of infertility diagnoses and care using ICD-9 and CPT codes. RESULTS: Less than 2% (n=1323) of OEF/OIF/OND women Veterans received an infertility diagnosis during the study period. Compared with women VA users without infertility diagnosis, those with infertility diagnosis were younger, obese, black, or Hispanic, have a service-connected disability rating, a positive screen for military sexual trauma, and a mental health diagnosis. Overall, 22% of women with an infertility diagnosis received an infertility assessment or treatment. Thirty-nine percent of women Veterans receiving infertility assessment or treatment received this care from non-VA providers. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, a small proportion of OEF/OIF/OND women Veterans received infertility diagnoses from the VA during the study period, and an even smaller proportion received infertility treatment. Nearly 40% of those who received infertility treatments received these treatments from non-VA providers, indicating that the VA may need to examine the training and resources needed to provide this care within the VA. Understanding women's use of VA infertility services is an important component of understanding VA's commitment to comprehensive medical care for women Veterans.
Authors: G C Gray; B D Coate; C M Anderson; H K Kang; S W Berg; F S Wignall; J D Knoke; E Barrett-Connor Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1996-11-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: S M Frayne; K M Skinner; L M Sullivan; T J Tripp; C S Hankin; N R Kressin; D R Miller Journal: J Womens Health Gend Based Med Date: 1999 Jul-Aug
Authors: Maria Rosario G Araneta; Karen M Schlangen; Larry D Edmonds; Daniel A Destiche; Ruth D Merz; Charlotte A Hobbs; Timothy J Flood; John A Harris; Diane Krishnamurti; Gregory C Gray Journal: Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol Date: 2003-04
Authors: Bevanne A Bean-Mayberry; Elizabeth M Yano; Cynthia D Caffrey; Lisa Altman; Donna L Washington Journal: Mil Med Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 1.437
Authors: Ginny L Ryan; Michelle A Mengeling; Brenda M Booth; James C Torner; Craig H Syrop; Anne G Sadler Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2014-05-27 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Joseph L Goulet; Shawn L Fultz; David Rimland; Adeel Butt; Cynthia Gibert; Maria Rodriguez-Barradas; Kendall Bryant; Amy C Justice Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2007-12-15 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Rachel P Goossen; Karen M Summers; Ginny L Ryan; Michelle A Mengeling; Brenda M Booth; James C Torner; Craig H Syrop; Anne G Sadler Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2018-11-27 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Michael Fenstermaker; Sujay Paknikar; Amarnath Rambhatla; Dana A Ohl; Ted A Skolarus; James M Dupree Journal: Curr Urol Rep Date: 2017-09-18 Impact factor: 3.092
Authors: Jodie G Katon; Laurie Zephyrin; Anne Meoli; Avanthi Hulugalle; Jeane Bosch; Lisa Callegari; Ileana V Galvan; Kristen E Gray; Kristin O Haeger; Claire Hoffmire; Silvina Levis; Erica W Ma; Jennifer E Mccabe; Yael I Nillni; Suzanne L Pineles; Shivani M Reddy; David A Savitz; Jonathan G Shaw; Elizabeth W Patton Journal: Semin Reprod Med Date: 2019-04-19 Impact factor: 1.303
Authors: Philip W Chui; Denise Esserman; Lori A Bastian; Jeptha P Curtis; Parul U Gandhi; Lindsey Rosman; Nihar Desai; Ronald G Hauser Journal: Med Care Date: 2020-12 Impact factor: 3.178
Authors: Claire A Hoffmire; Lisa A Brenner; Jodie Katon; Laurel A Gaeddert; Christin N Miller; Alexandra L Schneider; Lindsey L Monteith Journal: Womens Health Issues Date: 2022-03-08
Authors: Elisheva R Danan; Erin E Krebs; Kristine Ensrud; Eva Koeller; Roderick MacDonald; Tina Velasquez; Nancy Greer; Timothy J Wilt Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2017-09-14 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Morine Cebert-Gaitors; Peggy Ann Shannon-Baker; Susan G Silva; Renee E Hart; Samad Jahandideh; Rosa Gonzalez-Guarda; Eleanor L Stevenson Journal: F S Rep Date: 2022-02-22
Authors: Amanda J Adeleye; Tanya W Kristof; Aaditi G Naik; Sandra Madueke Laveaux; Jennifer Cone; Sarah Faris; Tanya L Zakrison Journal: F S Rep Date: 2021-12-01