Literature DB >> 25767785

Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with "all-inside" technique: a technical note.

Corrado Bait1, Matteo Denti1, Emanuele Prospero1, Alessandro Quaglia1, Antonio Orgiani1, Piero Volpi1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries are an increasingly recognized cause of knee instability in the practice of orthopaedic surgery and sports medicine. Clinical interest in these injuries has been increasing over the last several decades as knowledge and understanding of the biomechanical consequences and surgical reconstruction options have progressed. These injuries can be extremely challenging for the treating physician as substantial controversy exists regarding the optimal management of this problem. There has also been increasing interest and recognition of the importance of secondary stabilizing structures, including the posterolateral and posteromedial corner injuries as well as the issues with malalignment that must also be addressed at the time of PCL surgery to optimize results. Thanks to the continuous research for a correct anatomical placement and new systems of fixation, we can now perform the tibial and femoral bone tunnel more easily and safely by retrograde out-in approach with a special "drill-pin".
CONCLUSION: this technique provides a graduated precise execution of the tunnels. New methods were also developed to determine the so-called "second-generation cortical suspensory fixations" that have the feature of being "Adjustable": shortens implant by pulling on strands to allow cinching graft passing and tensioning button to regulate their length after fixation and then to create tension in the new graft, once introduced into the joint.

Entities:  

Keywords:  alignment; implant position; knee arthroplasty; patient specific; unicompartmental

Year:  2015        PMID: 25767785      PMCID: PMC4327357     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J        ISSN: 2240-4554


  10 in total

1.  Reconstruction of isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries: a clinical comparison of the transtibial and tibial inlay techniques.

Authors:  Jong-Keun Seon; Eun-Kyoo Song
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 2.  Evaluation and treatment of posterior cruciate ligament injuries.

Authors:  C D Harner; J Höher
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Muscle, Ligaments and Tendons Journal. Basic principles and recommendations in clinical and field science research.

Authors:  Johnny Padulo; Francesco Oliva; Antonio Frizziero; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2014-02-24

4.  Clinical outcomes after isolated arthroscopic single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Jon K Sekiya; Robin V West; Bernard C Ong; James J Irrgang; Freddie H Fu; Christopher D Harner
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 5.  Positioning of the posterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  K Juergensen; J C Edwards; R P Jakob
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Long-term results.

Authors:  A B Lipscomb; A F Anderson; E D Norwig; W D Hovis; D L Brown
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadriceps tendon autograft: minimal 3 years follow-up.

Authors:  Chih-Hwa Chen; Wen-Jer Chen; Chun-Hsiung Shih; Shih-Wei Chou
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  The accuracy of the clinical examination in the setting of posterior cruciate ligament injuries.

Authors:  R A Rubinstein; K D Shelbourne; J R McCarroll; C D VanMeter; A C Rettig
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Comparison of tibial inlay versus transtibial techniques for isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: minimum 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  John D MacGillivray; Beth E Shubin Stein; Maxwell Park; Answorth A Allen; Thomas L Wickiewicz; Russell F Warren
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.772

10.  Functional outcome following PCL and complex knee ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  E B Goudie; E M Will; J F Keating
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 2.199

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Surgical time for graft preparation using different suture techniques.

Authors:  Lawrence Camarda; Sebastian Giambartino; Michele Lauria; Michele Saporito; Vito Triolo; Michele D'Arienzo
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2016-09-17

2.  Double-Bundle, All-Inside Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Technique Using 2 Separate Autologous Grafts.

Authors:  Roy A G Hoogeslag; Bart W Oudelaar; Rianne Huis In't Veld; Reinoud W Brouwer
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2016-09-26

3.  Single versus double bundle in posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Filippo Migliorini; Andrea Pintore; Filippo Spiezia; Francesco Oliva; Frank Hildebrand; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.