David Angrave1, Andy Charlwood2, Mark Wooden3. 1. The York Management School, University of York, York, UK. 2. School of Business and Economics, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK. 3. Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It is widely believed that persons employed in jobs demanding long working hours are at greater risk of physical inactivity than other workers, primarily because they have less leisure time available to undertake physical activity. The aim of this study was to test this hypothesis using prospective data obtained from a nationally representative sample of employed persons. METHODS: Longitudinal data from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia Survey (93,367 observations from 17,893 individuals) were used to estimate conditional fixed effects logistic regression models of the likelihood of moderate or vigorous physical exercise for at least 30 min, at least four times a week. RESULTS: No significant associations between long working hours and the incidence of healthy levels of physical activity were uncovered once other exogenous influences on activity levels were controlled for. The odds of men or women who usually work 60 or more hours per week exercising at healthy levels were 6% and 11% less, respectively, than those of comparable persons working a more standard 35-40 h/week; however, neither estimate was significantly different from 0 at 95% CI. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that there is no trade-off between long working hours and physical activity in Australia. It is argued that these findings are broadly consistent with previous research studies from Anglo-Saxon countries (where long working hours are pervasive) that employed large nationally representative samples. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
BACKGROUND: It is widely believed that persons employed in jobs demanding long working hours are at greater risk of physical inactivity than other workers, primarily because they have less leisure time available to undertake physical activity. The aim of this study was to test this hypothesis using prospective data obtained from a nationally representative sample of employed persons. METHODS: Longitudinal data from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia Survey (93,367 observations from 17,893 individuals) were used to estimate conditional fixed effects logistic regression models of the likelihood of moderate or vigorous physical exercise for at least 30 min, at least four times a week. RESULTS: No significant associations between long working hours and the incidence of healthy levels of physical activity were uncovered once other exogenous influences on activity levels were controlled for. The odds of men or women who usually work 60 or more hours per week exercising at healthy levels were 6% and 11% less, respectively, than those of comparable persons working a more standard 35-40 h/week; however, neither estimate was significantly different from 0 at 95% CI. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that there is no trade-off between long working hours and physical activity in Australia. It is argued that these findings are broadly consistent with previous research studies from Anglo-Saxon countries (where long working hours are pervasive) that employed large nationally representative samples. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Authors: Jaana T Kari; Jaakko Pehkonen; Mirja Hirvensalo; Xiaolin Yang; Nina Hutri-Kähönen; Olli T Raitakari; Tuija H Tammelin Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-08-28 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Katriina Heikkila; Solja T Nyberg; Ida E H Madsen; Ernest de Vroome; Lars Alfredsson; Jacob J Bjorner; Marianne Borritz; Hermann Burr; Raimund Erbel; Jane E Ferrie; Eleonor I Fransson; Goedele A Geuskens; Wendela E Hooftman; Irene L Houtman; Karl-Heinz Jöckel; Anders Knutsson; Markku Koskenvuo; Thorsten Lunau; Martin L Nielsen; Maria Nordin; Tuula Oksanen; Jan H Pejtersen; Jaana Pentti; Martin J Shipley; Andrew Steptoe; Sakari B Suominen; Töres Theorell; Jussi Vahtera; Peter J M Westerholm; Hugo Westerlund; Nico Dragano; Reiner Rugulies; Ichiro Kawachi; G David Batty; Archana Singh-Manoux; Marianna Virtanen; Mika Kivimäki Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2016-02-18 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Jaana I Halonen; Anna Pulakka; Jussi Vahtera; Jaana Pentti; Hanna Laström; Sari Stenholm; Linda Magnusson Hanson Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2019-12-13 Impact factor: 4.402