Literature DB >> 25766852

Evaluation of a Telehealth Service for COPD and HF patients: Clinical outcome and patients' perceptions.

Bassel Odeh1, Reem Kayyali2, Shereen Nabhani-Gebara2, Nada Philip3, Patricia Robinson4, Catherine Russell Wallace5.   

Abstract

NHS Croydon Health Services and NHS Croydon Clinical Commissioning Group have been providing telehealth services for the past 36 months. The aim of this study was to measure the impact of telehealth when implemented as a service within a standard patient care pathway. To measure the clinical outcomes, the number of A&E visits and hospital admissions, recorded on the NHS Secondary Uses Service database, were compared before and after the implementation of the telehealth service. The number of all events despite its cause and the number of events related to the patients' diagnosed condition were collected. To elicit patients' perceptions about the telehealth service, a cross sectional survey of patients registered on the triage manager database was used to explore their perceptions, concerns and general satisfaction with the telehealth service via a 4 point likert scale questionnaire. The data of 48 patients were collected and telehealth reduced the number of both A&E and hospital admission due to all causes by 13% (P = 0.42) and 22% (P = 0.048), respectively. When only the events directly related to the patient's diagnosed condition were considered, a reduction by 36% (P = 0.03) and 28% (P = 0.02) was recorded for A&E visits and hospital admission respectively. 27 patients consented to participate in the survey. Overall, patients were very satisfied with telehealth services. Patients agreed that telehealth had improved their health, it was a convenient form of health care delivery for them and they were more involved in the decisions about their care or treatment. In addition, since being on telehealth, patients' confidence in managing their health increased from somewhat confident to confident. Telehealth, when provided as a service within a standard care pathway, seems to decrease hospital admissions and A&E visits. Good patient satisfaction suggests that the current service is accepted and it could be further expanded to include a larger number of patients.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25766852     DOI: 10.1177/1357633X15574807

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Telemed Telecare        ISSN: 1357-633X            Impact factor:   6.184


  6 in total

1.  Patients' and Healthcare Personnel's Experiences of Health Coaching with Online Self-Management in the Renewing Health Project.

Authors:  Inger Lindberg; Birgitta Lindberg; Siv Söderberg
Journal:  Int J Telemed Appl       Date:  2017-12-31

2.  Feasibility of a Comprehensive Home Monitoring Program for Sarcoidosis.

Authors:  Catharina C Moor; Yasmin Gür-Demirel; Marlies S Wijsenbeek
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2019-05-05

3.  Efficacy of telemedicine for the management of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pei Xuan Kuan; Weng Ken Chan; Denisa Khoo Fern Ying; Mohd Aizuddin Abdul Rahman; Kalaiarasu M Peariasamy; Nai Ming Lai; Nicholas L Mills; Atul Anand
Journal:  Lancet Digit Health       Date:  2022-09

4.  Comparison of patient perceptions of Telehealth-supported and specialist nursing interventions for early stage COPD: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Deborah A Fitzsimmons; Jill Thompson; Claire L Bentley; Gail A Mountain
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  An Open Platform for Seamless Sensor Support in Healthcare for the Internet of Things.

Authors:  Jorge Miranda; Jorge Cabral; Stefan Rahr Wagner; Christian Fischer Pedersen; Blaise Ravelo; Mukhtiar Memon; Morten Mathiesen
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Study protocol: effects, costs and distributional impact of digital primary care for infectious diseases-an observational, registry-based study in Sweden.

Authors:  Jens Wilkens; Hans Thulesius; Eva Arvidsson; Anna Lindgren; Bjorn Ekman
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.