Nancy A Borstelmann1,2, Shoshana M Rosenberg1,3, Kathryn J Ruddy4, Rulla M Tamimi3,5, Shari Gelber1, Lidia Schapira3,6, Steven Come3,7, Virginia Borges8, Evan Morgan1, Ann H Partridge1,3. 1. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. 2. School of Social Work, Simmons College, Boston, MA, USA. 3. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 4. Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. 5. Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. 6. Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 7. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA. 8. University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Using a large prospective cohort of women age 40 or younger diagnosed with breast cancer, we examined the relationship between perceived partner support and anxiety. METHODS: Six hundred seventy-five young women with breast cancer Stages I-III, median age 36, completed a self-report baseline questionnaire. Perceived partner support was assessed using items extracted from the marital subscale of the Cancer Rehabilitation Evaluation System; generalized social support was assessed with the Medical Outcomes Study-Social Support Survey. Anxiety was measured using the anxiety subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Multivariable logistic regression analyses evaluated the association between partner support, other sociodemographic factors, and anxiety. RESULTS: Mean age at diagnosis was 35.4 years. Fourteen percent of the women were not partnered, and among those who were partnered or in a significant relationship, 20% were categorized as unsupported. In univariate and multivariable analysis adjusting for sociodemographic factors, women in an unsupported-partnered relationship had higher odds of anxiety symptoms compared with women in a supported-partnered relationship. Young age and being financially insecure were also both independently associated with anxiety. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that partner support may play a key role in a young woman's adjustment to a serious stressor such as breast cancer. In addition, younger age increases vulnerability to anxiety as does struggling with finances. Because supportive efforts of a partner have potential to protect against the impact of stress, interventions to enhance partner support and reduce anxiety might be beneficial to address challenges experienced as a couple in this setting.
OBJECTIVE: Using a large prospective cohort of women age 40 or younger diagnosed with breast cancer, we examined the relationship between perceived partner support and anxiety. METHODS: Six hundred seventy-five young women with breast cancer Stages I-III, median age 36, completed a self-report baseline questionnaire. Perceived partner support was assessed using items extracted from the marital subscale of the Cancer Rehabilitation Evaluation System; generalized social support was assessed with the Medical Outcomes Study-Social Support Survey. Anxiety was measured using the anxiety subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Multivariable logistic regression analyses evaluated the association between partner support, other sociodemographic factors, and anxiety. RESULTS: Mean age at diagnosis was 35.4 years. Fourteen percent of the women were not partnered, and among those who were partnered or in a significant relationship, 20% were categorized as unsupported. In univariate and multivariable analysis adjusting for sociodemographic factors, women in an unsupported-partnered relationship had higher odds of anxiety symptoms compared with women in a supported-partnered relationship. Young age and being financially insecure were also both independently associated with anxiety. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that partner support may play a key role in a young woman's adjustment to a serious stressor such as breast cancer. In addition, younger age increases vulnerability to anxiety as does struggling with finances. Because supportive efforts of a partner have potential to protect against the impact of stress, interventions to enhance partner support and reduce anxiety might be beneficial to address challenges experienced as a couple in this setting.
Authors: Adeyiza O Momoh; Wess A Cohen; Kelley M Kidwell; Jennifer B Hamill; Ji Qi; Andrea L Pusic; Edwin G Wilkins; Evan Matros Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Catherine Pesce; Jennifer Jaffe; Kristine Kuchta; Katharine Yao; Mark Sisco Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2020-10-08 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Margaret Krasne; Kathryn J Ruddy; Philip D Poorvu; Shari I Gelber; Rulla M Tamimi; Lidia Schapira; Jeffrey Peppercorn; Steven E Come; Virginia F Borges; Ann H Partridge; Shoshana M Rosenberg Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2022-08-20 Impact factor: 3.359
Authors: Samantha G Bromfield; Samaah Sullivan; Ryan Saelee; Lisa Elon; Bruno Lima; An Young; Irina Uphoff; Lian Li; Arshed Quyyumi; J Douglas Bremner; Viola Vaccarino; Tené T Lewis Journal: Ann Behav Med Date: 2020-10-01
Authors: John M Salsman; Suzanne C Danhauer; Justin B Moore; Edward H Ip; Laurie E McLouth; Chandylen L Nightingale; Christabel K Cheung; Kristin M Bingen; Reginald D Tucker-Seeley; Denisha Little-Greene; Dianna S Howard; Bryce B Reeve Journal: Cancer Date: 2021-04-13 Impact factor: 6.921
Authors: Bojoura Schouten; Elke Van Hoof; Patrick Vankrunkelsven; Ward Schrooten; Paul Bulens; Frank Buntinx; Jeroen Mebis; Dominique Vandijck; Irina Cleemput; Johan Hellings Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2016-03-11 Impact factor: 2.655