BACKGROUND: Radical external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is a standard treatment for prostate cancer patients. Despite this, the rate of intraprostatic relapses after primary EBRT is still not negligible. There is no consensus on the most appropriate management of these patients after EBRT failure. For these patients, local salvage therapy such as radical prostatectomy, cryotherapy, and brachytherapy may be indicated. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this review were to analyze the eligibility criteria for careful selection of appropriate patients and to evaluate the oncological results and complications for each method. METHODS: A review of the literature was performed to identify studies of local salvage therapy for patients who had failed primary EBRT for localized prostate cancer. RESULTS: Most studies demonstrated that local salvage therapy after EBRT may provide long-term local control in appropriately selected patients, although toxicity is often significant. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that for localized prostate cancer recurrence after EBRT, the selection of a local treatment modality should be made on a patient-by-patient basis. An improvement in selection criteria and an integrated definition of biochemical failure for all salvage methods are required to determine which provides the best oncological outcome and least comorbidity.
BACKGROUND: Radical external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is a standard treatment for prostate cancerpatients. Despite this, the rate of intraprostatic relapses after primary EBRT is still not negligible. There is no consensus on the most appropriate management of these patients after EBRT failure. For these patients, local salvage therapy such as radical prostatectomy, cryotherapy, and brachytherapy may be indicated. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this review were to analyze the eligibility criteria for careful selection of appropriate patients and to evaluate the oncological results and complications for each method. METHODS: A review of the literature was performed to identify studies of local salvage therapy for patients who had failed primary EBRT for localized prostate cancer. RESULTS: Most studies demonstrated that local salvage therapy after EBRT may provide long-term local control in appropriately selected patients, although toxicity is often significant. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that for localized prostate cancer recurrence after EBRT, the selection of a local treatment modality should be made on a patient-by-patient basis. An improvement in selection criteria and an integrated definition of biochemical failure for all salvage methods are required to determine which provides the best oncological outcome and least comorbidity.
Authors: Brecht Devos; Walid Al Hajj Obeid; Colin Andrianne; Romain Diamand; Alexandre Peltier; Wouter Everaerts; Hein Van Poppel; Roland Van Velthoven; Steven Joniau Journal: World J Urol Date: 2019-01-21 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Gregory T Chesnut; Amy L Tin; Arjun Sivaraman; Toshikazu Takeda; Taehyoung Lee; Jonathan Fainberg; Nicole Benfante; Daniel D Sjoberg; Hebert Alberto Vargas; Samson W Fine; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham; Jonathan A Coleman; Karim A Touijer; Michael J Zelefsky; Behfar Ehdaie Journal: Urol Oncol Date: 2021-02-12 Impact factor: 2.954
Authors: Romuald Zdrojowy; Janusz Dembowski; Bartosz Małkiewicz; Krzysztof Tupikowski; Wojciech Krajewski Journal: Cent European J Urol Date: 2016-07-04