| Literature DB >> 25765665 |
Simon Lebech Cichosz1, Mette Dencker Johansen2, Søren Tang Knudsen3, Troels Krarup Hansen3, Ole Hejlesen2.
Abstract
Diabetic retinopathy may be present at the time type 2 diabetes is diagnosed, and initial screening encompassing an eye examination performed by an ophthalmologist or optometrist is therefore recommended. However, proper screening for retinopathy may be challenging in many parts of the world. We hypothesized that simple, commonly available patient characteristics can be used to identify patients at high risk for having retinopathy. We investigated data from multiple years extracted from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey which holds information about blood glucose and eye examinations. Individuals with hitherto undiagnosed diabetes were classified according to the presence or absence of retinopathy. Linear classification was used to predict which patients had retinopathy at the time of diagnosis. A total of 266 individuals with undiagnosed diabetes were identified from the cohorts. Of these, 222 individuals had no sign of retinopathy, whereas 44 had mild or moderate non-proliferative retinopathy. Using information regarding HbA1c, BMI, waist circumference, age, systolic blood pressure, urinary albumin, and urinary creatinine, we were able to construct a model that predicts the presence of retinopathy with a positive predictive value of 22% and a negative predictive value of 99%. Only one true positive (1/44) with mild non-proliferative retinopathy was falsely classified. A classification model using readily available patient information and routine biochemical measures can be used to identify patients at high risk of having retinopathy at the time their diabetes is diagnosed. The model may be used to identify high-risk patients for retinopathy screening.Entities:
Keywords: Diabetic retinopathy; Prediction model; Risk factors; Screening
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25765665 DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2015.02.020
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diabetes Res Clin Pract ISSN: 0168-8227 Impact factor: 5.602