Literature DB >> 25765071

Quantum versus classical annealing of Ising spin glasses.

Bettina Heim1, Troels F Rønnow1, Sergei V Isakov2, Matthias Troyer3.   

Abstract

Quantum annealers use quantum fluctuations to escape local minima and find low-energy configurations of a physical system. Strong evidence for superiority of quantum annealing (QA) has come from comparing QA implemented through quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) simulations to classical annealing. Motivated by recent experiments, we revisit the question of when quantum speedup may be expected. Although a better scaling is seen for QA in two-dimensional Ising spin glasses, this advantage is due to time discretization artifacts and measurements that are not possible on a physical quantum annealer. Simulations in the physically relevant continuous time limit, on the other hand, do not show superiority. Our results imply that care must be taken when using QMC simulations to assess the potential for quantum speedup.
Copyright © 2015, American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Year:  2015        PMID: 25765071     DOI: 10.1126/science.aaa4170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  12 in total

1.  Travel time optimization on multi-AGV routing by reverse annealing.

Authors:  Renichiro Haba; Masayuki Ohzeki; Kazuyuki Tanaka
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-22       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Analytical solution for nonadiabatic quantum annealing to arbitrary Ising spin Hamiltonian.

Authors:  Bin Yan; Nikolai A Sinitsyn
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  Evaluating the job shop scheduling problem on a D-wave quantum annealer.

Authors:  Costantino Carugno; Maurizio Ferrari Dacrema; Paolo Cremonesi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Solving Set Cover with Pairs Problem using Quantum Annealing.

Authors:  Yudong Cao; Shuxian Jiang; Debbie Perouli; Sabre Kais
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Stabilizers as a design tool for new forms of the Lechner-Hauke-Zoller annealer.

Authors:  Andrea Rocchetto; Simon C Benjamin; Ying Li
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 14.136

6.  Bifurcation-based adiabatic quantum computation with a nonlinear oscillator network.

Authors:  Hayato Goto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Creation and Annihilation of Skyrmions in the Frustrated Magnets with Competing Exchange Interactions.

Authors:  Yong Hu; Xiaodan Chi; Xuesi Li; Yan Liu; An Du
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Zero-temperature quantum annealing bottlenecks in the spin-glass phase.

Authors:  Sergey Knysh
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Maximum-Entropy Inference with a Programmable Annealer.

Authors:  Nicholas Chancellor; Szilard Szoke; Walter Vinci; Gabriel Aeppli; Paul A Warburton
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Efficiency of quantum vs. classical annealing in nonconvex learning problems.

Authors:  Carlo Baldassi; Riccardo Zecchina
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.